Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제63권1호
  • /
  • Pages.115-124
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seismic response of soil-structure interaction using the support vector regression

  • 투고 : 2016.11.23
  • 심사 : 2017.04.29
  • 발행 : 2017.07.10
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In this paper, a different technique to predict the effects of soil-structure interaction (SSI) on seismic response of building systems is investigated. The technique use a machine learning algorithm called Support Vector Regression (SVR) with technical and analytical results as input features. Normally, the effects of SSI on seismic response of existing building systems can be identified by different types of large data sets. Therefore, predicting and estimating the seismic response of building is a difficult task. It is possible to approximate a real valued function of the seismic response and make accurate investing choices regarding the design of building system and reduce the risk involved, by giving the right experimental and/or numerical data to a machine learning regression, such as SVR. The seismic response of both single-degree-of-freedom system and six-storey RC frame which can be represent of a broad range of existing structures, is estimated using proposed SVR model, while allowing flexibility of the soil-foundation system and SSI effects. The seismic response of both single-degree-of-freedom system and six-storey RC frame which can be represent of a broad range of existing structures, is estimated using proposed SVR model, while allowing flexibility of the soil-foundation system and SSI effects. The results show that the performance of the technique can be predicted by reducing the number of real data input features. Further, performance enhancement was achieved by optimizing the RBF kernel and SVR parameters through grid search.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abbasi Farfani, H., Behnamfar, F. and Fathollahi, A. (2015), "Dynamic analysis of soil-structure interaction using the neural networks and the support vector machines", Exp. Syst. Appl., 42(1), 8971-8981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.07.053
  2. Arefi, M.J. (2008), "Effects of soil-structure interaction on the seismic response of existing R.C. frame buildings", Masters, University of Pavia, Pavia.
  3. ATC 3-06, (1982), "Tentative Provisions for the Development of Seismic Regulations for Buildings", Washington, DC, USA.
  4. Aydemir, M.E. and Aydemir, C. (2016), "Overstrength factors for SDOF and MDOF systems with soil structure interaction", Earthq. Struct., 10(6), 1273-1289. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1273
  5. Carr, A.J. (2008), "Nonlinear inelastic program Ruaumoko", New Zealand.
  6. Chambers, J.D. (1998), "A distributed spring soil model for dynamic soil-structure interaction analysis", University of Canterbury, Christchurch.
  7. Chore, H.S., Ingle, R.K. and Sawant, V.A. (2014), "Nonlinear soil structure interaction of space frame-pile foundation-soil system", Struct. Eng. Mech., 49(1), 95-110. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2014.49.1.095
  8. Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A. and Folz, B. (2002), "Seismic response of self-centering hysteretic SDOF systems", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31(1), 1131-1150. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.152
  9. Cortes C. and Vapnik V. (1995), "Support-vector network", Machine Learn., 20(1), 273-297.
  10. FEMA (1997), "NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings", FEMA 273; FEMA 274; FEMA (Series), Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  11. Galli, M. (2005), "Evaluation of the seismic response of existing R.C. frame buildings with masonry infills", Masters, University of Pavia, Pavia.
  12. Girma, H. (2009), A Tutorial on Support Vector Machine, Center of Experimental Mechanics. University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
  13. Jaya, K.P. and Prasad, M.A. (2002), "Embedded foundation in layered soil under dynamic excitations", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 22(6), 485-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0267-7261(02)00032-5
  14. Mallinson, H. and Gammerman, A. (2003), "Imputation using support vector machines", Department of Computer Science. Royal Holloway, University of London. Egham, UK.
  15. Mihailo, D.T., Maria, I.T. and Tzong-Ying, H. (2001), "Full-scale experimental studies of soil-structure interaction", the 2nd USJapan workshop on soil-structure interaction, Tsukuba City, Japan, March.
  16. Nguyen, Q.V., Fatahi, B. and Hokmabadi, A.S. (2016), "The effects of foundation size on the seismic performance of buildings considering the soil-foundation-structure interaction" Struct. Eng. Mech., 58(6), 1045-1075. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.58.6.1045
  17. Pampanin, S., Christopoulos, C. and Chen, T. (2006), "Development and validation of a metallic haunch seismic retrofit solution for existing under-designed RC frame buildings", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 35(1), 1739-1766. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.600
  18. Palanci, M., Kalkan, A. and Senel, S.M. (2016), "Investigation of shear effects on the capacity and demand estimation of RC buildings", Struct. Eng. Mech., 60(6), 1021-1038. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2016.60.6.1021
  19. Ribeiro, D.B. and de Paivab, J.B. (2015), "An alternative BE-FE formulation for a raft resting on a finite soil layer", Eng. Anal. Boundary Element., 50(1), 352-359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2014.09.016
  20. Rodrigues, M.E. and Montes, R. (2000), "Seismic response and damage analysis of buildings supported on the flexible soil", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 29(5), 647-665. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5<647::AID-EQE929>3.0.CO;2-A
  21. Sarkani, S., Lutes, L.D., Jin, S. and Chan, C. (1999), "Stochastic analysis of seismic structural response with soil-structure interaction", Struct. Eng. Mech., 8(1), 53-72. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.1999.8.1.053
  22. Shen, C., Wang, D., Liu, Y., Kong, F. and Tse, P.W. (2014) "Recognition of rolling bearing fault patterns and sizes based on two-layer support vector regression machines", Smart Struct. Syst., 13(3), 453-471. https://doi.org/10.12989/sss.2014.13.3.453
  23. Tabatabaiefar, H.R., Behzad Fatahi, Ghabraie, K. and Zhou W.H. (2015), "Evaluation of numerical procedures to determine seismic response of structures under influence of soil-structure interaction", Struct. Eng. Mech., 56(1), 27-47. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.1.027
  24. Vapnik, V.N. (1998), Statistical Learning Theory, John Wiley, New York, USA.
  25. Wolf, J.P. (1994), Foundation Vibration Analysis using Simple Physical Models, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA.
  26. Yerli, H.R., Temel, B. and Kiral, E. (1998), "Transient infinite elements for 2-dimensional soil-structure interaction analysis", J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., ASCE, 124(10), 976-988. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1998)124:10(976)