Structural Engineering and Mechanics

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Energy-based design base shear for RC frames considering global failure mechanism and reduced hysteretic behavior

  • Merter, Onur (Department of Civil Engineering, Dokuz Eylul University) ;
  • Ucar, Taner (Department of Architecture, Dokuz Eylul University)
  • Received : 2016.06.24
  • Accepted : 2017.05.13
  • Published : 2017.07.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

A nonlinear static procedure considering work-energy principle and global failure mechanism to estimate base shears of reinforced concrete (RC) frame-type structures is presented. The relative energy equation comprising of elastic vibrational energy, plastic strain energy and seismic input energy is obtained. The input energy is modified with a factor depending on damping ratio and ductility, and the energy that contributes to damage is obtained. The plastic energy is decreased with a factor to consider the reduced hysteretic behavior of RC members. Given the pre-selected failure mechanism, the modified energy balance equality is written using various approximations for modification factors of input energy and plastic energy in scientific literature. External work done by the design lateral forces distributed to story levels in accordance with Turkish Seismic Design Code is calculated considering the target plastic drift. Equating the plastic energy obtained from energy balance to external work done by the equivalent inertia forces considering, a total of 16 energy-based base shears for each frame are derived considering different combinations of modification factors. Ductility related parameters of modification factors are determined from pushover analysis. Relative input energy of multi degree of freedom (MDOF) system is approximated by using the modal-energy-decomposition approach. Energy-based design base shears are compared with those obtained from nonlinear time history (NLTH) analysis using recorded accelerograms. It is found that some of the energy-based base shears are in reasonable agreement with the mean base shear obtained from NLTH analysis.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbas, B. and Shen, J. (2003), "Earthquake resistant design and energy concepts", Tech. J. Turkish Chamber Civ. Engineers, 14(2), 2877-2901.
  2. Akiyama, H. (1985), Earthquake-Resistant Limit-State Design for Buildings, The University of Tokyo Press, Japan.
  3. Bai, J. and Ou, J. (2012), "Plastic limit-state design of frame structures based on the strong-column weak-beam failure mechanism", Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September.
  4. Bayat, M.R., Goel, S.C. and Chao, S.H. (2008), "Further refinement of performance-based plastic design of structures for earthquake resistance", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  5. Benavent-Climent, A., Pujades, L.G. and Lopez-Almansa, F. (2002), "Design energy input spectra for moderate seismicity regions", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 31(5), 1151-1172. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.153
  6. Benavent-Climent, A., Lopez-Almansa, F. and Bravo-Gonzales, D.A. (2010), "Design energy input spectra for moderate-to-high seismicity regions based on Colombian earthquakes", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 30(11), 1129-1148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2010.04.022
  7. Blandon, C.A. (2004), "Equivalent viscous damping equations for direct displacement based design", M.Sc. Dissertation, Rose School, Pavia, Italy.
  8. Calvi, G.M., Priestley, M.J.N. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2008), "Displacement-based seismic design of structures", 3rd National Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology, Athens, Greece, November.
  9. Chao, S.H. and Goel, S.C. (2005), "Performance-based seismic design of ebf using target drift and yield mechanism as performance criteria", Research Report MI 48109-2125; The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
  10. Chopra, A.K. (1995), Dynamics of Structures, Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
  11. Chou, C.C. and Uang, C.M. (2003), "A procedure for evaluating seismic energy demand of framed structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 32(2), 229-244. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.221
  12. Dogru, S., Aksar, B., Akbas, B., Shen, J. and Doran, B. (2015), "Seismic energy response of two-story X-braced frames", 3rd Turkish Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Izmir, Turkey, October.
  13. Dwairi, H.M. (2004), "Equivalent damping in support of direct displacement-based design with applications to multi-span bridges", Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
  14. Dwairi, H.M., Kowalsky, M.J. and Nau, J.M. (2007), "Equivalent damping in support of direct displacement-based design", J. Earthq. Eng., 11(4), 512-530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601033884
  15. Ezz, A.A.E. (2008), "Deformation and strength based assessment of seismic failure mechanisms for existing RC frame buildings", M.Sc. Dissertation, European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, Rose School, Pavia, Italy.
  16. Fajfar, P. and Vidic, T. (1994), "Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 23(5), 523-537. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230505
  17. FEMA P440A (2009), Effects of strength and stiffness degradation on seismic response, Applied Technology Council; Redwood City, California.
  18. FEMA-356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency; Washington DC.
  19. Greco, R. (2014), "Energetic considerations on the effects of inelastic stiffness on nonlinear seismic response", Recent Advances in Applied Mathematics, Modelling and Simulation; Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Applied Mathematics, Simulation, Modelling (ASM'14), Mastorakis, N.E., Demiralp, M., Mukhopadhyay, N., Mainardi, F. (editors), 270-285, WSEAS Press, Sofia.
  20. Gulkan, P. and Sozen M.A. (1974), "Inelastic responses of reinforced concrete structures to earthquakes motions", ACI Journal, Proceedings, 71(12), 604-610.
  21. Housner, G.W. (1956), "Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes", Proceedings of the First World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Berkeley, California, USA, June.
  22. Jacobsen L.S. (1930), "Steady forced vibrations as influenced by damping", ASME Transactione, 52(1), 169-181.
  23. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2007), "Effective cyclic energy as a measure of seismic demand", J. Earthq. Eng., 11(5), 725-751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601033827
  24. Kappos, A.J., Saiidi, M.S., Aydinoglu, M.N. and Isakovic, T. (editors) (2012), Seismic Design and Assessment of Bridges: Inelastic Methods of Analysis and Case Studies, Springer, NY.
  25. Kazantzi, A.K. and Vamvatsikos, D. (2012), "A study on the correlation between dissipated hysteretic energy and seismic performance", 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisboa, Portugal, September.
  26. Khan, E., Kowlasky, M.J. and Nau, J.M. (2016), "Equivalent viscous damping model for short-period reinforced concrete bridges", J. Bridge Eng., 21(2), 04015047. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)BE.1943-5592.0000803
  27. Kim, H.J. (2012), "Seismic response of flag-shaped hysteretic SDOF systems with seismic fuses", Int. J. Steel Struct., 12(4), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-012-4006-2
  28. Kowalsky, M.J. (1994), "Displacement based design: A methodology for seismic design applied to RC bridge columns", M.Sc. Dissertation, University of California, San Diego.
  29. Kuwamura, H. and Galambos, T. (1989), "Earthquake load for structural reliability", J. Struct. Eng., 115(6), 1446-1462. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:6(1446)
  30. Leelataviwat, S., Goel, S.C. and Stojadinovic, B. (2002), "Energybased seismic design of structures using yield mechanism and target drift", J. Struct. Eng., 128(8), 1046-1054. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:8(1046)
  31. Leelataviwat, S., Seawon, W. and Goel, S.C. (2008), "An energy based method for seismic evaluation of structures", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  32. Leelataviwat, S., Saewon, W. and Goel, S.C. (2009), "Application of energy balance concept in seismic evaluation of structures", J. Struct. Eng., 135(2), 113-121. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2009)135:2(113)
  33. Liao, W.C. (2010), "Performance-based plastic design of earthquake resistant reinforced concrete moment frames", Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.
  34. Lieping, Y. and Zhe, Q. (2009), "Failure mechanism and its control of building structures under earthquakes based on structural system concept", J. Earthq. Tsunami, 3(4), 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793431109000627
  35. Lopez-Almansa, F., Yazgan, A.U. and Benavent-Climent, A. (2013), "Design energy input spectra for high seismicity regions based on Turkish registers", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 11(4), 885-912. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-012-9415-2
  36. Massumi, A. and Monavari, B. (2013), "Energy based procedure to obtain target displacement of reinforced concrete structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., 48(5), 681-695. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.48.5.681
  37. Mergos, P.E. and Beyer, K. (2014), "Loading protocols for European regions of low to moderate seismicity", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 12(6), 2507-2530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9603-3
  38. Muljati, I., Asisi, F. and Willyanto, K. (2015), "Performance of force based design versus direct displacement based design in predicting seismic demands of regular concrete special moment resisting frames", Procedia Eng., 125, 1050-1056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.11.161
  39. Pampamin, S., Christopoulos, C. and Priestley, M.J.N. (2002), Residual Deformations in the Performance-Based Seismic Assessment of Frame Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  40. Paolacci, F. (2013). "An energy-based design for seismic resistant structures with viscoelastic dampers", Earthq. Struct., 4(2), 219-239. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.4.2.219
  41. Priestley, M.J.N. (1996), "Displacement-based seismic assessment of existing reinforced concrete buildings", Bull. NZ. Nat. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 29(4), 256-272.
  42. Priestley, M.J.N. (2003), "Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering, revisited", The Ninth Mallet Milne Lecture; European School for Advanced Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk, Rose School, Pavia, Italy.
  43. Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-Based Seismic Design of Structures, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
  44. PEER (2016), Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Strong Ground Motion Database, http://ngawest2.berkeley.edu/
  45. Rodrigues, H., Varum, H., Arede, A. and Costa, A. (2012), "A comparative analysis of energy dissipation and equivalent viscous damping of RC columns subjected to uniaxial and biaxial loading", Eng. Struct., 35, 149-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.11.014
  46. SAP2000 Ultimate (2016), Integrated Solution for Structural Analysis and Design, Computers and Structures Inc. (CSI), Berkeley, California, USA.
  47. SeismoSpect (2016), Seismosoft, Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions, Pavia, Italy.
  48. TSDC (2007), Turkish seismic design code, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement; Ankara, Turkey.
  49. TS500 (2000), Requirements for design and construction of reinforced concrete structures, Turkish Standards Institution; Ankara, Turkey.
  50. Uang, C.M. and Bertero, V.V. (1990), "Evaluation of seismic energy in structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. D., 19(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190108
  51. Yazgan, U. (2010), "The use of post-earthquake residual displacements as a performance indicator in seismic assessment", Ph.D .Dissertation, ETH Zurich, Zurich.
  52. Ye, L.P., Lu, X.Z., Ma, Q.L., Cheng, G.Y., Song, S.Y., Miao, Z.W. and Pan, P. (2008), "Study on the influence of postyielding stiffness to the seismic response of building structures", 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.

Cited by

  1. Performance assessment of RC frame designed using force, displacement & energy based approach vol.73, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2020.73.6.699