Journal of the Korean Geosynthetics Society (한국지반신소재학회논문집)

Korean Geosynthetics Society (한국지반신소재학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Bearing Capacity Improvement Effect of Inner Cone Penetration Equiped Open-Ended Steel Pipe Pile

개단 강관말뚝 내부 콘항타에 의한 지지력 증대효과 분석

  • Lee, Junho (Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Ji, Su-Bin (Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Lee, Kicheol (Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University) ;
  • Kim, Dongwook (Dept of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Incheon National University)
  • Received : 2017.02.13
  • Accepted : 2017.06.15
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study analyzes behavior of bearing capacity of open-ended pipe pile from laboratory experiment results. Unlike the conventional pipe piles, cone penetration is implemented into the inside of the pipe pile. During the cone penetration, cone driving energy helps densification of plugged soils and soils below the pile end. Sand pluviator was used to obtain homogeneous soil layers. Two kinds of piles with different pile outer surface roughness were prepared, and two different drop heights of pile driving were applied. Eight experimental cases varying pile outer surface roughness, pile driving energy for conventional and cone penetration implemented piles were conducted. From the experiments, ultimate load of the pile increased approximately by 70% for increased pile driving height, and it increased by 21% for rougher surface pile. When cone penetration is implemented, the ultimate load increased by 40% in average.

본 연구에서는 콘 장비를 강관말뚝 중공에 설치함에 따른 말뚝의 거동을 분석하기 위해 축소 모형실험을 진행하였다. 콘 장비를 항타하여 설치 할 경우 먼저 강관 내부에 유입되는 관내토의 높이를 수치상으로 확인 할 수 있으며, 이를 통해 플러깅을 예측하여 플러깅에 따른 말뚝의 거동을 분석 할 수 있다. 또한 물리적인 항타 에너지로 지반의 강성과 강도를 증가 시켜 지지력을 상승 시킬 것으로 기대된다. 강사 장치를 이용하여 상대밀도 90%의 지반을 조성하고 거칠기가 다른 두 강관말뚝을 항타높이를 200mm와 500mm로 나누어 근입깊이 600mm까지 설치한다. 그리고 콘 장비의 유무에 따라 총 8가지 케이스를 나누어 말뚝의 지지력을 분석하였다. 말뚝의 항타높이, 말뚝의 거칠기, 콘 장비의 유무에 따른 세 가지 변수 중 항타높이가 약 70%로 지지력에 미치는 영향이 가장 컸으며 다음으로 콘 장비의 유무가 약 40%, 말뚝의 거칠기가 약 21%로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Been, K., Lingnau, B. E., Crooks, J. H. A., and Leach, B., 1987, "Cone Penetration Test Calibration for Erksak (Beaufort Sea) Sand," Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol.24, pp. 601-610. https://doi.org/10.1139/t87-074
  2. Bellotti, R., Bizzi, G., and Ghionna, V., 1982, "Design, Construction and Use of a Calibration Chamber," Proceeding of the 2nd European Symposium on Penetration Testing, Amsterdam, Vol.2, pp.439-446.
  3. Paik, K. H. and Salgado, R. (2003). "Determination of bearing capacity of open- and closed-ended piles driven into sands." J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng., 129(1), pp.46-57. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2003)129:1(46)
  4. Brucy, F., Meunier, J. and Nauroy, JF. (1991) Behavior of Pile Plug in Sandy Soils during and after Driving, Proc. 23rd Annual Offshore Technology Conf., Vol.1, pp.145-154.
  5. Kraft, L. M. Jr. (1991), "Performance of Axially Loaded Pipe Piles in Sand", Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol.117, No.2, pp.272-296. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:2(272)
  6. Szechy, C. H. (1959), "Tests with Tubular Piles", Acta Technica, Hungarian Academy of Science, Vol.24, pp.181-219.
  7. Chapman, G. A. and Donald, I. B., 1981, "Interpretation of Static Penetration Tests in Sand," Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Vol.2, Stockholm, pp.455-458.
  8. Davisson, M. T., 1972, "High capacity piles." In innovations in Foundation Construction, Soil Mechanics Division, Illinois, ASCE, Chicago, USA, pp.81-112.
  9. Davisson, M. T. 1975. "Pile Load Capacity." Proc. ASCE Conf. Design Construction and Performance of Deep Foundations, ASCE, University of California, Berkeley.
  10. Franke, E. 1989, "Co-report to Discussion, Session 13: large-diameter piles," 12th Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Rio de Janeiro.
  11. Holden, J.C., 1976. "The Determination of Deformation and Shear Strength Parameters for Sands Using the Electrical Friction-Cone Penetrometer," Report 110, Norwegian Geotechnical Institute, Oslo, pp.55-60.
  12. Houlsby, G. T. and Hitchman, R., 1988, "Calibration Chamber Tests of a Cone Penetrometer in Sand," Geotechnique 38, No.1, pp.39-44. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1988.38.1.39
  13. Iwasaki, K., Tanizawa, F., Zhou, S., and Tatsuoka, F., 1988, "Cone Resistance and Liquefaction Strength of Sand," Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Penetration Testing, Orlando, pp.785-791.
  14. Jeong, S. S. and Ko, J. Y., 2016, "Influence Factors on the Degree of Soil Plugging for Open-Ended Piles", Journal of The Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol.32, No.5, pp.27-36. https://doi.org/10.7843/KGS.2016.32.5.27
  15. Kim, Y. K., 2002, A Comparative Study on the Allowable Bearing Capacity of Pile by Various models, Master Thesis, Dongshin University, pp.10-20.
  16. Kindel, C. E., 1977, "Mechanism of Soil Resistance for Driven Pipe Piles," The 4th Annual Symposium of the Waterway Port, Coastal and Ocean Division of ASCE, Long Beach, pp.251-268.
  17. Oh, H. J., 2009, "Reliability Analysis and Resistance Characteristics of Dynamic Cone Penetration according to Ground Characteristic," Master Thesis, Chungju National University, pp.7-18.
  18. O'Neill, M.W. and Raines, R.D., 1991, "Load Transfer for Pipe Piles in Highly Pressured Dense Sand," Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol.117, No.8, pp.1208-1226. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:8(1208)
  19. Paik, K. H., 1994, "Characteristics of Bearing Capacities for Open-Ended Steel Pipe Piles Driven into Cohesionless Soil," Ph.D Thesis, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, pp.6-16.
  20. Paikowsky, S. G., 1989, A static evaluation of soil plug behavior with application to the pile plugging problem, D.Sc. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technologym Cambridge, MA.
  21. Parkin, A.K., Holden, J., Aamot, K., Last, N., and Lunne, T., 1980, "Laboratory Investigations of CPT's in Sand," Report 52108-9, NGI, Oslo.
  22. Schnaid, F. and Houlsby, G. T., 1991, "An Assessment of Chamber Size Effects in the Calibration of in Situ Tests in Sand," Geotechnique 41, No.3, pp.437-445. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1991.41.3.437
  23. Yoo, N. J., 2007, "A Study on the Estimation of Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils using DCPT," Ph.D Thesis, Sejong University, pp.45-50.