Quality Improvement in Health Care (한국의료질향상학회지)

Korean Society for Quality in Health Care (한국의료질향상학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Efficacy of Chlorhexidine in Hemodialysis Vascular Access Device Disinfection

혈액투석 혈관통로 소독에 있어 클로르헥시딘의 효과

  • Yang, Ji-Hyun (Korea University Anam Hospital Hemodialysis room) ;
  • Yu, Young-Mi (Korea University Anam Hospital Hemodialysis room) ;
  • Yu, Min-Gyeong (Korea University Anam Hospital Hemodialysis room) ;
  • Moon, Sung-Mi (Korea University Anam Hospital Hemodialysis room) ;
  • Park, Sue-Jean (Korea University Anam Hospital Hemodialysis room)
  • 양지현 (고려대학교 안암병원 인공신장실) ;
  • 유영미 (고려대학교 안암병원 인공신장실) ;
  • 유민경 (고려대학교 안암병원 인공신장실) ;
  • 문성미 (고려대학교 안암병원 인공신장실) ;
  • 박수진 (고려대학교 안암병원 인공신장실)
  • Received : 2017.05.24
  • Accepted : 2017.06.20
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to apply the disinfection method using chlorhexidine in practice on disinfection of vascular access for hemodialysis. Methods: This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial for examining effectiveness on infection of the vascular access device for hemodialysis when using chlorhexidine and betadine/alcohol. One-hundred-thirty study participants were separated into two groups randomly. Infection signs of the vascular access device for hemodialysis were observed and recorded before disinfection on vascular access device. Result: Before the study, there was no difference between the experimental group (chlorhexidine group) and the control group (betadine/alcohol group) in general characteristics and hematological index. Incidence of infection rate of chlorhexidine group was 0 percent and the betadine/alcohol group was 1.5 percent. There was no significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: This study examined the effectiveness of prevention of infection with the disinfection method using chlorhexidine and betadine/alcohol. The disinfection method using chlorhexidine is considered an effective and alternative method of betadine/alcohol.

Keywords

References

  1. ESRD Registry Committee, Korean Society of Nephrology. Current renal replacement therapy in Korea. Insan memorial. dialysis registry, 2014. Korean Journal of Nephrology. 2015;35:117-118.
  2. Kim JK. Vascular Access Mornitoring. dialysis registry, Korean Journal of Nephrology. 2010;29(1):262-265.
  3. Yoon EH. Choice of vascular access in patients initiating hemodialysis, Division of nephrology and training courses 11. Seoul, Korea: Catholic University; 2008:1-3.
  4. Kwon OJ. How to prevent and manage HD access infection?, Division of nephrology and training courses 5. Seoul, Korea: Catholic University; 2002:73-75.
  5. Lee HY, Choi S, Jeong SY, Kim SK. Clinical analysis for the patients of arterio - venous Fistula. Korean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery. 2002;18(1):119-125.
  6. Oh CK. Vascular Access for Hemodialysis, Division of nephrology and training courses 8. Seoul, Korea: Catholic University; 2005:66-75.
  7. Jin DC. Inflammation and Vascular Access Failure, Division of nephrology and training courses 8. Seoul, Korea: Catholic University; 2005:6-9.
  8. Lee JY, Kim G, Park CW, Lee CH. A Case of Allergic Contact Dermatitis to Antiseptics. Korean Journal of Dermatology. 1999;37(7):966-968.
  9. Garland JS, Alex CP, Mueller CD, Shivpuri C, Harris MC, Naples M, et al. A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates. Pediatrics. 2001;107(6):1413-1437.
  10. Park ES, Jeong JS, Kim KM, Kim OS, Jeong SY, Jang SY, et al. Descriptive study on the current usage of disinfectants in Korea. Korean Journal of Nosocomial Infection Control. 2006;11(1):42-49.
  11. Kimsonline drug imformation. KIMS Company Limited [Intrenet]. Seoul, Korea; 2005. [cited 2017 May 24]. Available from: http://www.kimsonline.co.kr/drugcenter/generic/gensearch.
  12. Kinirons B, Mimoz O, Lafendi L, Meunier J, Nordmann P. Chlrohexidine versus povidone iodine in preventing colonization of continuous epidural catheters in children: A randomized controlled trial. Anesthesiology. 2001;94(2):239-244. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200102000-00012
  13. Chaiyakunapruk N, Veenstra DL, Lipsky BA, Saint S. Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: a meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2002;136(11):792-801. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-136-11-200206040-00007
  14. Hong SY, Kim NC, Kim JM, Kim SY, Lee SJ, Oh ES, et al. Change in the counts of colony according to hand disinfectants in operating rooms. Journal of Korean Clinical Nursing Research. 2005;11(2):91-102.
  15. Park ES, Jang SY, Kim KA, Kim YS, Jung SK, Woo K, et al. Comparison of a waterless, brushless chlorhexidine/ethanol emollient with pocidone-iodine surgical scrubs. Korean Journal of Nosocomial Infection Control. 2006;11(1):50-57.
  16. Choi JS. Evaluation of a waterless, scrubless chlorhexidine gluconate/ethanol surgical scrub and povidone-iodine for antimicrobial efficacy. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2008;38(1):39-44. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2008.38.1.39
  17. Ruschulte H. Franke M, Gastmeier P, Zenz S, Mahr KH, Buchholz S, et al. Prevention of central venous catheter related infections with chlorhexidine gluconate impregnated wound dressings: a randomized controlled trial. Annals of Hematology. 2008;88(3):267-272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-008-0568-7
  18. Safdar N, O’Horo JC, Ghufran A, Bearden A, Didier ME, Chateau D, et al. Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing for prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infection: a meta-analysis. Critical Care Medicine. 2014;42(7):1703-1716. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000000319
  19. Timsit JF, Mimoz O, Mourvillier B, Souweine B, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Alfandari S, et al. Randomized controlled trial of chlorhexidine dressing and highly adhesive dressing for preventing catheter-related infections in critically ill adults. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine. 2012;186(12):1272-1280. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201206-1038OC
  20. Paglialonga F, Consolo S, Biasuzzi A, Assomou J, Gattarello E, Patricelli MG, et al. Reduction in catheter-related infections after switching from povidone-iodine to chlorhexidine for the exit-site care of tunneled central venous catheters in children on hemodialysis. Hemodialysis International (Standard Subscription). 2014;18(1):13-18. https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.12218
  21. Onder AM, Chandar J, Billings A, Diaz R, Francoeur D, Abitbol C, et al. Chlorhexidine-based antiseptic solutions effectively reduce catheter-related bacteremia. Pediatric Nephrology. 2009;24(9):1741-1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-009-1154-5
  22. Price CS, Hacek D, Noskin GA, Peterson LR. An outbreak of bloodstream infections in an outpatient hemodialysis center. Infection Control and Hospital Epidermiology. 2002;23(12):725-729. https://doi.org/10.1086/502001
  23. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2006. National Kidney Foundation, Inc. [Intrenet]. USA: Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2006; 2015 [cited 2015 may 20]. Available from: http://www2.kidney.org/professionals/KDOQI/guideline_upHD_PD_VA.
  24. National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI (2000). Clinical Practice Guidelines for Vascular Access: update 2000. Prevention of complications: infection. American Journal of Kidney Disease. 2000;37(1):138-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-6386(01)80067-6
  25. Ishizuka M, Nagata H, Takagi K, Kubota K. Comparison of 0.05% chlorhexidine and 10% povidone-iodine as cutaneous disinfectant for prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection: a comparative study. European Surgical Research. 2009;43(3):286-290. https://doi.org/10.1159/000231709
  26. Landry D, Braden G. Reducing catheter-related infections in hemodialysis patients. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2014;9(7):1156-1159. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04700514