DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Residual Strain of Prestressed Concrete Beam Member by Different Analysis Method

해석법 차이에 의한 프리스트레스트 콘크리트 보부재의 잔류변형률 비교

  • Lee, Duck Ki (Ulsan College School of Environment & Building Design)
  • 이덕기 (울산과학대학교 공간디자인학부)
  • Received : 2017.06.08
  • Accepted : 2017.06.20
  • Published : 2017.07.01

Abstract

In the seismic design of building structural members, due to the complexity of the placement of PC steels in prestressed concrete members, it is necessary to review and define the definition of member damage in comparison with reinforced concrete members. In this study, the results of past experiments compared with the calculation results by 'section Analysis Method', with the aim of reviewing the precision of calculation results when member damage evaluation is performed using the section analysis method. Furthermore, it is also compared with the calculation results by the 'split Element Method'. In addition, parametric studies were carried out, and the influence of the difference between the amount of PC steels and reinforced bar on the residual strain was examined.

Keywords

References

  1. Ishii T, Kamihigashi H, Nakatsuka T, Kishimoto I. Estimation of load deformation relations of PC beams using equivalent lengths of plastic hinge zones and analysis for flexural sections. AIJ. 1999;C-2, Structures IV:1043-1044.
  2. Enomoto Hidefumi. Analytical properties related to the PRC beams. Osaka University. c1981.
  3. Nishiyama M, Muguruma H, Watanabe F. Hysteretic Restoring Force Characteristics of Unbonded Prestressed Concrete Structure Under Earthquake Loads. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering. 1989 Jun;22(2):112-121.
  4. Morita S, Sumi. T. Bond-slip relationship under repeated loading. Transactions of the architectural Institute of Japan. 1975;229:15-24. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijsaxx.229.0_15
  5. Watanabe F, Lee JY, Nishiyama M. Structual Performance of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Different Grade Longitudinal Bars. ACI Structual Journal. 1995;92(4):412-418.
  6. Misumi T, Tagawa H, Nishiyama M. The idealization of stressstrain prestressing steel bar. AIJ. 1997;C-2, Structures IV:885-886.
  7. Nakatsuka T, Masayuki A. Experimental Study on Load Bearing and Deformation Mechanism and Structural Performance of Cnatilever Type Prestressed Concrete Beams with Different Connecting System (Compressed or unit type)and PC Tendon Type(round or deformed). Concrete research and technology. 2000;11(3):97-110. https://doi.org/10.3151/crt1990.11.3_97
  8. Lee DK. Research of residual strain calculation of prestressed concrete beam element. Journal of the Korea Concrete Institute. 2014 Aug;26(4):555-562. https://doi.org/10.4334/JKCI.2014.26.4.555