Imaging Science in Dentistry

Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology (대한영상치의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dilemma of gonial angle measurement: Panoramic radiograph or lateral cephalogram

  • Received : 2016.11.27
  • Accepted : 2017.02.26
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of panoramic imaging in measuring the right and left gonial angles by comparing the measured angles with the angles determined using a lateral cephalogram of adult patients with class I malocclusion. Materials and Methods: The gonial angles of 50 class I malocclusion patients (25 males and 25 females; mean age: 23 years) were measured using both a lateral cephalogram and a panoramic radiograph. In the lateral cephalograms, the gonial angle was measured at the point of intersection of the ramus plane and the mandibular plane. In the panoramic radiographs, the gonial angle was measured by drawing a line tangent to the lower border of the mandible and another line tangent to the distal border of the ascending ramus and the condyle on both sides. The data obtained from both radiographs were statistically compared. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed between the gonial angle measured using the lateral cephalograms and that determined using the panoramic radiographs. Further, there was no statistically significant difference in the measured gonial angle with respect to gender. The results also showed a statistically insignificant difference in the mean of the right and the left gonial angles measured using the panoramic radiographs. Conclusion: As the gonial angle measurements using panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms showed no statistically significant difference, panoramic radiography can be considered in orthodontics for measuring the gonial angle without any interference due to superimposed images.

Keywords

References

  1. Xiao D, Gao H, Ren Y. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence. Eur J Orthod 2011; 33: 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjq064
  2. Nanda SK. Growth patterns in subjects with long and short faces. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1990; 98: 247-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81602-6
  3. Tahmina K, Tanaka E, Tanne K. Craniofacial morphology in orthodontically treated patients of class III malocclusion with stable and unstable treatment outcomes. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000; 117: 681-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70177-6
  4. Upadhyay RB, Upadhyay J, Agrawal P, Rao NN. Analysis of gonial angle in relation to age, gender and dentition status by radiological and anthropometric methods. J Forensic Dent Sci 2012; 4: 29-33. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-1475.99160
  5. Larheim TA, Svanaes DB. Reproducibility of rotational panoramic radiography: mandibular linear dimensions and angles. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986; 90: 45-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/0889-5406(86)90026-0
  6. Graber TM. Panoramic radiography in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod 1967; 53: 799-821. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(67)90088-7
  7. Mattila M, Kononen M, Mattila K. Vertical asymmetry of the mandibular ramus and condylar heights measured with a new method from dental panoramic radiographs in patients with psoriatic arthritis. J Oral Rehabil 1995; 22: 741-5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1995.tb00217.x
  8. McDavid WD, Tronje G, Welander U, Morris CR. Effects of errors in film speed and beam alignment on the image layer in rotational panoramic radiography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1981; 52: 561-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(81)90369-8
  9. Yeo DK, Freer TJ, Brockhurst PJ. Distortions in panoramic radiographs. Aust Orthod J 2002; 18: 92-8.
  10. Mattila K, Altonen M, Haavikko K. Determination of the gonial angle from the orthopantomogram. Angle Orthod 1977; 47: 107-10.
  11. Dahan J, Jesdinsky HJ. Evaluation of the orthopantomogram for cephalometric studies in orthodontics. Stoma (Heidelb) 1968; 21: 200-6.
  12. Bhullar MK, Uppal AS, Kochhar GK, Chachra S, Kochhar AS. Comparison of gonial angle determination from cephalograms and orthopantomogram. Indian J Dent 2014; 5: 123-6. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-962X.140820
  13. Shahabi M, Ramazanzadeh BA, Mokhber N. Comparison between the external gonial angle in panoramic radiographs and lateral cephalograms of adult patients with Class I malocclusion. J Oral Sci 2009; 51: 425-9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.51.425
  14. Araki M, Kiyosaki T, Sato M, Kohinata K, Matsumoto K, Honda K. Comparative analysis of the gonial angle on lateral cephalometric radiographs and panoramic radiographs. J Oral Sci 2015; 57: 373-8. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.57.373
  15. Alhaija ES. Panoramic radiographs: determination of mandibular steepness. J Clin Pediatr Dent 2005; 29: 165-6. https://doi.org/10.17796/jcpd.29.2.q4501432454g0763
  16. Dutra V, Yang J, Devlin H, Susin C. Mandibular bone remodeling in adults: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004; 33: 323-8. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr/17685970
  17. Ghosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM, Abhishek K. Remodeling of the antegonial angle region in the human mandible: a panoramic radiographic cross-sectional study. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010; 15: e802-7.
  18. Bhardwaj D, Kumar JS, Mohan M. Radiographic evaluation of mandible to predict the gender and age. J Clin Diagn Res 2014; 8: ZC66-9.
  19. Huumonen S, Sipila K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Soderholm AL, Remes-Lyly T, et al. Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil 2010; 37: 34-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02022.x
  20. Xie QF, Ainamo A. Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 2004; 91: 477-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.02.020
  21. Slagsvold O, Pedersen K. Gonial angle distortion in lateral head films: a methodologic study. Am J Orthod 1977; 71: 554-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(77)90005-7
  22. Nohadani N, Ruf S. Assessment of vertical facial and dentoalveolar changes using panoramic radiography. Eur J Orthod 2008; 30: 262-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjm106
  23. Fischer-Brandies H, Fischer-Brandies E, Dielert E. The mandibular angle in orthopantomogram. Radiologe 1984; 24: 547-9.

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of the relationship between gonial angle and impacted mandibular third molar teeth vol.95, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-019-00507-0
  2. Does Mandibular Gonial Angle Influence the Eruption Pattern of the Lower Third Molar? A Three-Dimensional Study vol.10, pp.18, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10184057