Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society

The Korean Neurosurgical Society (대한신경외과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Correlation between MRI Grading System and Surgical Findings for Lumbar Foraminal Stenosis

  • Jeong, Tae Seok (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Ahn, Yong (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Lee, Sang Gu (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Woo Kyung (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Son, Seong (Department of Neurosurgery, Gachon University Gil Medical Center) ;
  • Kwon, Jung Hwa (Department of Radiology, Nanoori Hospital)
  • Received : 2016.10.11
  • Accepted : 2017.01.11
  • Published : 2017.07.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective : Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading systems using sagittal images are useful for evaluation of lumbar foraminal stenosis. We evaluated whether such a grading system is useful as a diagnostic tool for surgery. Methods : Between July 2014 and June 2015, 99 consecutive patients underwent unilateral lumbar foraminotomy for lumbar foraminal stenosis. Surgically confirmed foraminal stenosis and the contralateral, asymptomatic neuroforamen were assessed based on a 4-point MRI grading system. Two experienced researchers independently evaluated the MR sagittal images. Interobserver agreement and intraobserver agreement were analyzed using ${\kappa}$ statistics. Results : The mean age of patients (54 women, 45 men) was 62.5 years. A total of 101 levels (202 neuroforamens) were evaluated. MRI grades for operated neuroforamens were as follows : Grade 0 in 0.99%, Grade 1 in 5.28%, Grade 2 in 14.85%, and Grade 3 in 78.88%. Interobserver agreement was moderate for operated neuroforamens (${\kappa}=0.511$) and good for asymptomatic neuroforamens (${\kappa}=0.696$). Intraobserver agreement by reader 1 for operated neuroforamens was good (${\kappa}=0.776$) and that for asymptomatic neuroforamens was very good (${\kappa}=0.831$). In terms of lumbar level, interobserver agreement for L5-S1 (${\kappa}=0.313$, fair) was relatively lower than the other level (${\kappa}=0.804$, very good). Conclusion : MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis is thought to be useful as a diagnostic tool for surgery in the lumbar spine; however, it is less reliable for symptomatic L5-S1 foraminal stenosis than for other levels. Thus, various clinical factors as well as the MRI grading system are required for surgical decision-making.

Keywords

References

  1. Attias N, Hayman A, Hipp JA, Noble P, Esses SI : Assessment of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lumbar spine foraminal stenosis--a surgeon's perspective. J Spinal Disord Tech 19 : 249-256, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bsd.0000203942.81050.c8
  2. Chang SB, Lee SH, Ahn Y, Kim JM : Risk factor for unsatisfactory outcome after lumbar foraminal and far lateral microdecompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : 1163-1167, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000216431.69359.91
  3. Fujiwara A, An HS, Lim TH, Haughton VM : Morphologic changes in the lumbar intervertebral foramen due to flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation: an in vitro anatomic and biomechanical study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26 : 876-882, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200104150-00010
  4. Grenier N, Kressel HY, Schiebler ML, Grossman RI, Dalinka MK : Normal and degenerative posterior spinal structures: MR imaging. Radiology 165 : 517-525, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.165.2.3659376
  5. Hasegawa T, An HS, Haughton VM, Nowicki BH : Lumbar foraminal stenosis: critical heights of the intervertebral discs and foramina. A cryomicrotome study in cadavera. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77 : 32-38, 1995 https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199501000-00005
  6. Jenis LG, An HS : Spine update. Lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25 : 389-394, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200002010-00022
  7. Kunogi J, Hasue M : Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16 : 1312-1320, 1991 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199111000-00012
  8. Landis JR, Koch GG : The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33 : 159-174, 1977 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
  9. Lee S, Lee JW, Yeom JS, Kim KJ, Kim HJ, Chung SK, et al. : A practical MRI grading system for lumbar foraminal stenosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194 : 1095-1098, 2010 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.2772
  10. Porter R, Hibbert C, Evans C : The natural history of root entrapment syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9 : 418-421, 1984 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198405000-00017
  11. Shim YJ, Ha HG, Lee JS, Kim YS, Park MS, Kim JS : Microsurgical decompression for lumbar stenosis via unilateral laminotomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 29 : 1505-1513, 2000
  12. Wildermuth S, Zanetti M, Duewell S, Schmid MR, Romanowski B, Benini A, et al. : Lumbar spine: quantitative and qualitative assessment of positional (upright flexion and extension) MR imaging and myelography. Radiology 207 : 391-398, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiology.207.2.9577486
  13. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik A, Widell EH, Knight GW, Patwardhan AG, et al. : Analysis of the morphometric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 12 : 160-166, 1987 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198703000-00012

Cited by

  1. The Usefulness of Selective Nerve Block in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis in Cases with Inconsistent MRI Findings and Clinical Presentations vol.27, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4184/jkss.2020.27.2.70
  2. Quantitative correlation of lumbar foraminal stenosis with local morphological metrics vol.30, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-021-06944-8