Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회지)

Korean Society of Archives and Records Management (한국기록관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Social Impacts of Archives through Outcome-based Evaluation

성과평가에 기반 한 기록관의 사회적 영향 분석 연구

  • 박성재 (한성대학교 응용인문학부 문헌정보전공)
  • Received : 2017.01.22
  • Accepted : 2017.02.24
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Archives identify and preserve records created by society. By making them available to people, archives can be a means of support to the community. The purpose of this study is to develop a model to measure the social impact of archives. Reviewing findings from previous research on the social impact of archives, this study's model is based on the logic model, an outcome-based evaluation model, given that impact is not only followed by outcomes but can be the outcome itself. The scope of social impact is limited to community empowerment in terms of the applicability of the suggested model. The model, which includes short-, medium-, and long-term outcomes, could be used to measure changes in the knowledge, attitudes, and skills of archive users, and the social engagement of the people who experienced those changes in the community. The proposed model could include final outcomes that indicate the increase of community empowerment according to the civil society engagement. It is expected that the model is validated through applying quantitative and qualitative methodologies to measure the social impact of archives.

기록관은 사회의 기록을 저장하고 이용토록함으로써 사회를 지탱하는 기반이 되는 장소이다. 이에 본 연구는 기록관이 사회에 미치는 영향을 분석하기 위한 프레임워크를 개발하였다. 제안 모델은 기존의 기록관의 사회적 영향에 관한 선행연구의 결과를 기반으로 하였으며 영향은 성과의 한 영역이자 축적된 성과의 발현이라는 점에서 대표적인 성과평가 모델중의 하나인 논리모형을 적용하여 개발되었다. 실제 측정을 위한 프레임워크 개발을 위해 광범위한 사회적 영향 중에서 지역사회 강화 측면을 측정하기 위한 모형을 제안했다. 초기, 중기, 장기 성과를 포함하는 제안모형은 기록관 이용을 통해 지식, 태도, 기술의 변화가 만들어 내는 사회적 참여활동의 증가를 측정하였다. 또한 시민의 사회참여의 증가로 인한 지역사회 강화를 최종 성과로 제안하고 있다. 제안된 모형을 기반으로 한 양적/질적 연구가 진행된다면 기록관의 사회적 영향이 분석될 것으로 기대된다

Keywords

References

  1. 국가기록원 (2011). 기록학 개론. 성남: 국가기록원.(National Archives of Korea (2011). Introduction to Archives. Seongnam: National Archives of Korea.)
  2. 국가기록원 (2014). '14년 국가기록원 기록물 열람서비스 고객만족도 조사 결과보고. 검색일자: 2017. 1. 31. http://www.archives.go.kr/next/common/downloadFile.do?up_filepath=2F757046696c652F6265666f7265496e666f2F313433343333353732383731372e706466(National Archives of Korea (2014). '14 Report on the survey results of reading service of archives in National Archives of Korea. Retrieved January, 9, 2015, from http://www.archives.go.kr/next/common/downloadFile.do?up_filepath=2F757046696c652F6265666f7265496e666f2F313433343333353732383731372e706466)
  3. 김두리, 김수정 (2014). 대학기록관 이용자의 기록정보서비스 인식에 관한 연구: J교육대학교를 중심으로. 정보관리학회지, 31(4), 29-47.(Kim, Du-ri & Kim, Soojung (2014). A study on users' perceptions of archival reference services in a University Archive. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 29-47.) https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.029
  4. 김지현 (2012). 국가기록원 기록정보서비스에 대한 이용자 인식에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(1), 167-187.(Kim, Ji-hyun (2012). A study on users' perception of reference services in National Archives of Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(1), 167-187.)
  5. 김현지 (2008). 웹을 통한 기록정보서비스 평가모형 개발과 서비스 평가: 대학기록관을 중심으로. 석사학위논문. 명지대학교 기록정보과학전문대학원, 기록관리전공.(Kim, Hyun-jee (2008). Evaluation model development for archival information service over the web and the service evaluation: Focused on University Archives. Master thesis. Graduate School of Records, Archives, & Information Science, Myungji University.)
  6. 김현지, 이해영 (2009). 웹 기록정보서비스 평가모형 개발과 서비스 평가. 한국기록관리학회지, 9(2), 59-78.(Kim, Hyun-Jee & Rieh, Hae-Young (2009). Evaluation model development for web archival information services and the service evaluation: Focused on University Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 9(2), 59-78.)
  7. 박성재, 이용구 (2015). 논리모델을 이용한 도서관 성과측정에 관한 연구. 한국비블리아학회지, 26(2), 269-287.(Park, Sung-Jae & Lee, Yonggu (2015). Measuring library outcomes using a logic model. Journal of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 26(2), 269-287.) https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2015.26.2.269
  8. 유사라, 한선영, 오혜경, 강소연 (2001). 정보서비스 평가 연구: 국내 행정부처 Web 정보사례. 한국문헌정보학회지, 35(3), 93-115.(Yoo, Sa-Rah, Han, S., Oh, H., & Kang, S. (2001) Quality control of web information service: The case of government web site. Journal of Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 35(3), 93-115.)
  9. 이명희 (2004). 중앙 행정부처 웹사이트의 정보서비스 평가: 정보공개와 이용자 참여를 중심으로. 한국비블리아학회지, 15(2), 195-218.(Lee, Myeong-Hee (2004). Assessment of information services available from Korean government websites. Journal of Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 15(2), 195-218.)
  10. 이윤주 (2007). 기록관의 온라인 서비스 향상을 위한 웹사이트 평가기준설계에 관한 연구. 기록학연구, 16, 147-200.(Lee, Yoon-Ju (2007). A study on the evaluating standards on-line service for archives. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 16, 147-200.)
  11. 이해영 (2012). 기록관의 정보서비스 현황 조사 및 서비스 개선 방안에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(3), 177-201.(Rieh, Hae-young (2012). Research on the current status of and the improvement plan for information services in records and archives centers. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(3), 177-201.)
  12. 이해영, 김영은, 김은영, 김현지, 남경희, 이미라, ... 최정윤 (2007). 기록정보서비스의 평가 및 개선방향. 한국기록관리학회지, 7(2), 25-42.(Rieh, Have-young, Kim, Y., Kim, E., Kim, H., Nam, K., Lee, M., ... Choi, J. (2007). Evaluation and improvement direction of information services in Records Centers and Archives: A case study. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 7(2), 25-42.)
  13. 장희정 (2012). 국가기록관 웹사이트의 평가에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(2), 51-70.(Jang, Hee-Jung (2012). A Study on Evaluation of National Archives Websites. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(2), 51-70.)
  14. 정우철, 이해영 (2016). 대학기록관 이용자의 기록정보서비스 평가. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(1), 195-221.(Jeong, Woo-Chul & Rieh, Hae-young (2016). Users' evaluation of information services in university archive. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 16(1), 195-221.) https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2016.16.1.195
  15. 한수연, 정동열 (2012). 기록물관리기관 서비스 품질 척도 개발에 관한 연구. 한국기록관리학회지, 12(1), 59-78.(Han, Soo-Yeon & Jeong, Dong-Youl (2012). A study on the development of archive service quality scale: Focused on public institutions. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 12(1), 59-78.)
  16. AEA Consulting (2005). Tyne & Wear Museums Bristol's museums, galleries & archives: Social impact programme assessment. London and New York: AEA Consulting.
  17. Associaltion of College and Research Libraries (2012). 2012 Top ten trends in academic libraries. College & Research Libraries News, 73(6), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.5860/crln.73.6.8773
  18. Brophy, P. (2005). The development of a model for assessing the level of impact of information and library services. Library and Information Research, 29(3), 43-49.
  19. Burns Owen Partnership. 2006. New directions in social policy: Developing the evidence base for museums, libraries and archives in England. Museums, Libraries and Archives Council, London. Retrieved January 41, 2017, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20111013135435/research.mla.gov.uk/evidence/documents/ndsp_developing_evidence_doc_6649.pdf
  20. Calvert, Philip J. & Hernon, Peter (1997). Surveying Service Quality within University Libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 23(5), 408-415. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0099-1333(97)90041-0
  21. Conway, P. (1986). Facts and frameworks: An approach to studying the user of archives. American Archivists, 49, 393-407. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.49.4.p21825jp21403087
  22. Conway, P. (1994). Partners in research: Improving access to the nation's archive. Pittsburgh, PA: Archives and Museum Informatics.
  23. Duff, W. M., Dryden, J., Limkilde, C., Cherry, J., & Bogomazova, E. (2008). Archivists' views of user-based evaluation: Benefits, barriers and requirements. American Archivist, 71(1), 144-166. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.71.1.y70837374478t146
  24. Duff, W. M., Flinn, A., Suurtamm, K. E., & Wallace, D. A. (2013). Social justice impact of archives: A preliminary investigation. Archival Science, 13(4), 317-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-012-9198-x
  25. Duff, W., Yakel, E., Tibbo, H., Cherry, J., McKay, A., Krause, M., & Sheffield, R. (2010). The development, testing, and evaluation of the Archival Metrics Toolkits. American Archivist, 73(2), 569-599. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.73.2.00101k28200838k4
  26. Durrance, J., Fisher, K., & Hinton, M. (2005). How libraries and librarians help: A guide to identifying user-centered outcomes. Chicago, IL.: ALA.
  27. Horton, S. J. & Spence, J. (2006). Scoping the economic and social impact of archives. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://www.socialvalueuk.org/app/uploads/2016/07/scoping_the_economic_and_social_impact_of_archives___report_9739.pdf
  28. The National Archives (n.d.). A guide to developing an outcomes framework for archives. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/22.01.16_Measuring_outcomes_for_archives.pdf
  29. The National Council on Archives (NCA), The Public Service Quality Group for Archives and Local Studies (PSQG), PSQG Performance Indicators Working Party (2003). Towards Generic and Universal PIs for Archives. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://www.archives.go.kr/next/common/downloadFile.do?up_filename=performance_measures.pdf&up_filepath=2F757046696c652F6d626f6172642F32303038303932383137313634323038302e706466
  30. PSQG (2011). Survey of visitors to U.K. archives 2011. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/archives/national-report-2011.pdf
  31. Pugh, Mary J. (2005). Providing reference services for archives and manuscripts. Chicago: Society of American Archivists.
  32. University of Wisconsin Extension. Welcome to Enhancing Program Performance with Logic Models. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from https://fyi.uwex.edu/programdevelopment/files/2016/03/lmcourseall.pdf
  33. Wavell, C., Baxter, G., Johnson, I., & Williams, D. (2002). Impact evaluation of Museums, Archives and Libraries: Available Evidence Project. The Council for Museums, Archives and Libraries.
  34. W. K. Kellogg Foundation (2001). W. K. Kellogg Foundation Logic Model Development Guide. Retrieved January 31, 2017, from https://www.wkkf.org/-/media/pdfs/logicmodel.pdf
  35. Yakel, E. & Tibbo, H. (2010). Standardized survey tools for assessment in archives and special collections. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041011064115