References
- Ahn, Chang-kyu & Cha, Kyung-Ok(1984). A Comparison of Four Statistical Procedures for Detecting Test Item-Bias. Social Survey Research, 3, 29-49.
- Angoff, W. H.(1982) Use of item difficulty and discriminant indices for detecting item bias. ed. by Berk, R. A. In Handbook of method for detecting test bias, 96-116. Baltimore, London: The Johns Hopkins University Press,
- Angoff, W. H. & Ford, S. F.(1973). Item-race interaction on a test of scholastic aptitude. Journal of Educational Measurement, 10(2), 95-106 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1973.tb00787.x
- Baker, F. B., & Al-Karni, A.(1991). EQUATE: Computer program for equating two metrics in item response theory [Computer program]. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin, Laboratory of Experimental Design.
- Camilli, G.(1979). A critique of the chi-square method assessing item bias. Unpublished paper, Laboratory of Education Research, University of Colorado at Boulder.
- Chin, Sujung & Seong, Tae-je(2004). An Exploratory Study on Item-format Related DIF with MH and SIBTEST techniques. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 17(2), 215-236.
- Choo, Jeong-A & Seong, Tae-je(1993). Detecting gender differently functioned items of the 4th and 5th tryouts of College Scholastic Ability Test by Mantel-Haeszel and Raju Methods. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 6(2), 259-286.
- Choo, Jeong-A.(1993). Detecting gender differently functioned items of the tryouts of College Scholastic Ability Test. Master's Thesis, Ehwa Womans University, Seoul.
- Cleary, T. A. & Hilton, T. L.(1968). An Investigation of Item Bias. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 28, 61-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316446802800106
- Cook, L. L..Dorans, N. J. & Eignor, D. R.(1988). An assessment of the dimensionality of three SAT-Verbal test editions. Journal of Educational Statistics, 13, 19-43. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986013001019
- Doolittle, A. E.(1984). Interpretation of differential item performance accompanied by gender differences in academic background. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
- Doolittle, A. E. & Cleary, T. A.(1987). Gender-based differential item performance in mathematics achievement items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 24(2), 157-166 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1987.tb00271.x
- Educational Research Institute of Seoul National University(1998). The encyclopedia of education. Seoul: Hawoo.
- Faggen-Steckler, J..K. A. McCarthy, & C. K. Tittle(1974). A quantitative method for measuring sex bias in standardized test. Journal of Educational Measurement, 11, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1974.tb00987.x
- Greaud, V. A.(1987). Investigation of the unidimensionality assumption of item response theory. Master's Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
- Haley, D. C.(1952). Estimation of the dosage ,ortality relationship when the dose is subject to error(Technical Report No. 15). Stanford CA: Stanford University, Applied Mathematics and Statistics Laboratory.
- Hambleton, R. K. & Swaminathan, H.(1985). Item responsw theory : Principles and application. Boston: Kluwer Boston
- Hambleton, R. K.(1989). Principles and selected applications of item response theory. In R. L. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement(3rd ed., pp. 147-200). New York: MacMillan
- Hambleton, R. K..Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J.(1991). Fundmentals of item response theory. CA: SAGE Publications.
- Hambleton, R. K..Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, J. H.(1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
- Hanson, B. A.(1988). Uniform DIF and DIF defined by differences in item response function. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 23(3), 244-253. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986023003244
- Harnish, D. L.(1994). Performance assessment in review : New direction for assessment student understanding. International Journal of Educational Research, 21(3), 341-350 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(06)80023-6
- Hatti, J. A.(1984). An empirical study of various indices for determining unidimensionality. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 19, 49-78. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr1901_3
- Holland, P. W. & Thayer, D. T.(1988) Differential item performance and the Mentel-Haenszel procedure. In H. Wainer & H, I, Braun(Eds.). Test validity(pp. 129-145). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Holweger, N. & Weston, T.(1998). Differential item functioning: an applied comparison of the item characteristic curve method with the logistic discriminant function method. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 422362)
- Jensen, A. R.(1969). How much can we boost IQ and Scholistic achievement?. Harvard Educational Review, 39, 81-83.
- Kim, S. H. & Cohen, A. S.(1991a). IRTDIF: A comparision of two area measures for detecting differential item function. Applied Psychological Measurement, 15, 269-278. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169101500307
- Kim, S. H. & Cohen, A. S.(1991b). IRTDIF: A computer program for IRT differential item functioning[Computer program]. Madison WI: University of Wisconsin.
- Kim, Shin-young(1993). An Empirical Study for Validity of Mantel-Haenszel Method. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 6(1), 59-90.
- Kim, Shin-young(2001). Methods of Analyzing Differently functioned items. Seoul: kyoyookkwahaksa.
- Kim, Sukwoo.(1991). Gender and OTL effects on mathematics achievement for U.S. SIMS 12th grade students. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 4, 32-58.
- Kim, Sukwoo. & Park, Haejin.(1994). A Study of Differential Item Functioning based on Gender and Major. Journal of Pedagogy in Pusan, 7, 45-64.
- Ko, Jung Hwa.Do, Jong Hoon, & Song, Miyoung.(2008). An Analysis of the Gender Difference in National Assessment of Educational Achievement of Mathematics. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 18(2), 179-200.
- Lee, Dae Sik & Kim, Su Mi.(2003). Elementary School Students' and Teachers' Responses on Sex Differences in Mathematics Learning. The Journal of Elementary Education, 16(1), 297-315.
- Lee, Myung-Ae(2010). DIF Identification via Hierarchical Nonlinear Model. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 23(1), 171-190.
- Lee. Young(2002). Detecting Differential Item Functioning based on Gender and Major : Verbal Area in the tryout of College Scholastic Ability Test. Master's Thesis, Pusan National University, Busan.
- Lehman, J. D.(1986). Opportunity to learn and differential item functioning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Valifornia, Los Angeles.
- Linn, R. L. & Harnish, D. L.(1981) Interactions between item content and group membership on achievement test items. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18, 109-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1981.tb00846.x
- Lord, F. M.(1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. Hilldale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Lord, F. M. & Novick, M. R.(1968). Statistic theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
- Mellenbergh, G. J.(1982). Contingency table models for assessing item bias. Journal of Educational Statistics, 7, 105-108. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986007002105
- Mislevy, R. J. & Bock, R. D.(1990). BILOG 3 for windows: Item analysis and test scoring with binary logistic models[Computer program]. Mooresville IN: Scientific Software Inc.
- Muthen, B..Kao, C.-F. & Burstein, L.(1988). Instructional sensitivity in mathematics achievement test item: Application of a new IRT-based detection technique. Forthcoming in Journal of Educational Measurement.
- Muthen, B. O. & Muthen, L. K.(2001). Mplus: Statistical analysis with latent variables[Computer program and manual]. Los Angeles: Statmodel.
- Noh, Un-Kyung(2007). Detecting Gender-related Differential Item Functioning on the Spatial Ability Test in the Aptitude Battery for Middle School Student. Master's Thesis, Ehwa Womans University, Seoul.
- Peterson, N. S..Kolen, M. S. & Hoover, H. D.(1989). Scaling, norming and equating. In Educational Measurement(3rd). Ed by Linn, R. L.. New York: Macmillian Publishing Company.
- Potenza, M. T. & Dorans, N. J.(1995). DIF Assessment for Polytomously Scored Item: A Framework for Classification and Evaluation. Applied Psychological Measurement, 19(1), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169501900104
- Raju, N. S.(1988). The area between item characteristic curves. Psychometrika, 53, 495-502. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294403
- Roussos, L. A. & Stout, W. F.(1996). Simulation studies of the effects of small sample size and studied item parameters on SIBTEST and Mantel-Haenszel type I error performance. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(2), 215-230.
- Runder, L. M.(1977). An evaluation of select approaches for biased item identification. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Catholic University of America, 18-27.
- Scheuneman, J. D.(1975). A new method of assessing bias in test items. Paper presented at annual meeting of American Educatioal Research Association. Washington D. C..
- Seong, Tae-je(1993). A Comparative Study between Raju and Mantel-Haeszel Methods for Detecting Differential Item Function. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 6(1), 91-120.
- Shealy, R. T. & Stout, W. F.(1993). An Item Response Model for Test Bias and Differential Test Functioning. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Song, Miyoung(2001). Detection of gender-related DIF and comparison of DIF procedures in a performance assessment. doctoral Thesis, Ehwa Womans University, Seoul.
- Stocking, M. L. & Lord, F. M.(1983). Developing a common metric in item response theory. Applied Psychological Measurement, 7, 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662168300700208
- Stout, W.(1987). A nonparametric approach for assessing latent trait unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 52, 589-617. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294821
- Swaminathan, H. & Rogers, H. J.(1990). Detecting differential item functioning using logistic regression procedures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 27, 361-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3984.1990.tb00754.x
- Williams, R. L.(1971). Abuse and misuse of testing black children. The Counseling Psychologists, 2, 62-73 https://doi.org/10.1177/001100007100200314