정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제21권1호
  • /
  • Pages.41-55
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

피지컬 컴퓨팅 교육에서 과학적 탐구 태도에 대한 과학경험, 교육지원, 학습몰입의 예측력 규명

The predictability of science experience, school support and learning flow on the attitude of scientific inquiry in physical computing education

  • 강명희 (이화여자대학교 교육교육과) ;
  • 장지은 (이화여자대학교 교육교육과) ;
  • 윤성혜 (이화여자대학교 교육교육과)
  • Kang, Myunghee (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Jang, JeeEun (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Yoon, Seonghye (Dept. of Educational Technology, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.29
  • 심사 : 2017.02.16
  • 발행 : 2017.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 관심을 받고 있는 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교육은 하드웨어와 소프트웨어 요소를 통합하여 의미 있고 창의적인 산출물을 개발함으로써, 과학적 탐구 태도를 함양시키는 데 효과적인 교육의 형태이다. 이에 본 연구는 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교육에서 주요 학습성과 변인으로 거론되는 과학적 탐구 태도를 교육성과 변인으로 상정하고, 이를 예측하는 요인을 규명하고자 과학경험, 교육지원, 학습몰입을 예측변인으로 상정하여 이들 변인의 예측력을 확인하였다. 이를 위해 초등학교 4학년에서 6학년인 영재교육프로그램 참가자 64명을 대상으로 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교육을 실시하여 자료를 수집하였다. 수집된 자료는 기술통계, 상관분석, 다중회귀분석 및 매개분석을 통해 분석되었다. 연구 결과, 과학경험과 학습몰입은 교육성과인 과학적 탐구 태도를 유의하게 예측하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 학습몰입은 과학경험과 과학적 탐구 태도, 교육지원과 과학적 탐구 태도 사이를 매개하는 것으로 나타났다. 이를 기반으로 피지컬 컴퓨팅 교육에서 과학적 탐구 태도 향상을 위해 과학경험 기회의 제공, 긍정적 교육지원의 필요, 학습몰입 촉진을 위한 전략이 필요함을 제안하였다.

The physical computing education, as the emerging field, is a form of education that helps learners to develop the attitude of scientific inquiry by developing meaningful and creative output through the integration of hardware and software elements. Based on the literature, the authors of the study used science experience, school support and learning flow as the variables that predict the outcome variable which is the attitude of scientific inquiry. The authors collected data from 64 fourth and sixth graders who studied physical computing at an institution for the gifted and talented in Korea and then analyzed them using descriptive statistics, correlation, multiple regression and simple mediation analysis methods. As a result, science experience and learning flow significantly predicted the attitude of scientific inquiry. In addition, learning flow mediated the relationship between science experience and the attitude of scientific inquiry, and the relationship between school support and the attitude of scientific inquiry. Based on these results, the authors propose that to promote the attitude of scientific inquiry in physical computing education, strategies must be implemented for improving science experience, school support and learning flow in instructional design.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Aron, J. (2012). Makey Makey DIY circuit board makes bananas musical. New Scientist, 214, 22.
  2. Bae, H., & Yoo, B. G. (2012). The Effects of Learning Based Flow Theory on Scientific Achievement and Attitude toward Science. The Korean Society of Earth Science Education, 5(3), 225-234.
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
  4. Choi, Y. H. & Choi, K. H. (2012). Science Experience's Type and Meaning of Korean Middle School-Science Gifted Students in Parent, School, Out-of-School Institution. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(10), 1580-1598.
  5. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Nakamura, J. (2007). Psychological capital. Manuscript in preparation.
  6. D'Ausilio, A. (2012) Arduino: A Low-cost Multipurpose Lab Equipment. Behavior Research Methods 44(2), 305-313 https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0163-z
  7. Fraser, B. J. (1978). Development of a test of science-related attitudes. Science Education, 62(4), 509-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.3730620411
  8. Fraser, B. J., & Butts, W. L. (1982). Relationship between perceived levels of classroom individualization and science-related attitudes. Journal of research in Science Teaching, 19(2), 143-154. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660190206
  9. Halverson, E. R., & Sheridan, K. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495-504. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.84.4.34j1g68140382063
  10. Harju, B. L., & Eppler, M. A. (1997). Achievement of Motivation, Flow and Irration Beliefs in Traditional and nontraditional College Students. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(3), 147-157.
  11. Hwang, Y. H., Mun, K. J., & Park, Y. B. (2016). Study of Perception on Programming and Computational Thinking and Attitude toward Science Learning of High School Students through Software Inquiry Activity: Focus on using Scratch and physical computing materials. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 36(2), 325-335. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.2.0325
  12. Jackson, S. A., Martin, A. J., & Eklund, R. C. (2008). Long and short measures of flow: The construct validity of the FSS-2, DFS-2, and new brief counterparts. Journal of sport & exercise psychology, 30(5), 561. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.30.5.561
  13. Jang, Y., Lee, W., & Kim, J. (2015). Analysis of Pedagogical Usability about Tools in Physical Computing Education for Middle School Students. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 10(90), 636-641.
  14. Joo, Y. J., Kim, N. Y., & Kim, G. Y. (2010). The Structural Relationship among Self-Efficacy, Internal Locus of Control, School Support, Learning Flow, Satisfaction and Learning Persistence in Cyber Education. Journal of Educational Technology, 26(1), 25-55.
  15. Kang, H. S. (2016). Reflective Inquiry into Software Education based on Narrative Mode of Thought. Journal of Narrative and Educational Research, 4(1), 5-27
  16. Kang, M. H., Kim, H. S., & Lee, J. M. (2011) The Effects of Flow and Cognitive Presence on Learning Outcomes in a Middle School Science Class using Web-based Simulation. Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 17(1), 39-61.
  17. Kang, M. H., Kim, Y. J., Lim, H. Y., & Yoo, Y. R. (2014). Investigating the Structural Relationship among Science Experience, Learning Motivation, Achievement and Career Orientation of High school Students. East West Education, 18(3), 621-643
  18. Kim, J. H., & Kim, T. . (2016) The Effect of Physical Computing Education to Improve the Convergence Capability of Secondary Mathematics-Science Gifted Students. The Journal of Korean association of computer education, 19(2), 87-98.
  19. Kim, J. S., Han, S., Kim, S., Jung, S., Yang, J., Jang, E., Kim, J. (2015). A Research on the Development of Teaching and Learning Models for SW Education. (CR 2015-35). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute, KERIS.
  20. Kim, J. W., & Kim, D. H. (2016). Development of Physical Computing Curriculum in Elementary Schools for Computational Thinking. Journal of The Korean Association of information Education, 20(1), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2016.20.1.69
  21. Kim, N. G., & Ryu, C. Y. (2010). Development and Application of Tool for Measuring High School Students' Scientific Experience. The Journal of The Korean Earth Science Society. 31(3), 276-287. https://doi.org/10.5467/JKESS.2010.31.3.276
  22. Kim, N. Y. (2009). The Structural Relationship among Academic Motivation, Program, Organizational Support, Interaction, Flow and Learning Outcome in Cyber Education (Doctoral dissertation, Ewha Womans University).
  23. Kim, W. S. (2014). Electronic Kit Design for Cardboard Automata. International Journal of Robots, Education and Art, 4(1), 15.
  24. Lee, M. W., & Cho, H. H. (1985). Research on the Causes of Sex Difference in Science Achievements by High School Students. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 5(1), 35-47.
  25. Lee, S. W. (2003). Comparing Learners' with Institutions' Factors that Influence on Persistence in University Lifelong Education. The korean Society for Lifelong Education, 9(1), 117-114.
  26. Min, S. K., & Na, S. I. (2007). The Relationship between Learning Flow and Classroom Climate of Vocational High School Students. The Korean Society for Agricultural Education and Human Resrouce Development, 39(3), 45-68.
  27. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning & Ministry of Education (2015). From elementary school to college, blue print for SW education: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning & Ministry of Education released Master Plan to Realize a Software-centered Society. Sejong: Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning & Ministry of Education.
  28. O'Sullivan, D., & Igoe, T. (2004). Physical computing: sensing and controlling the physical world with computers. Boston, MA: Course Technology Press.
  29. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International journal of science education, 25(9), 1049-1079. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199
  30. Paechter, M., Maier, B. & Macher, D. (2010). Students' expectations of, and experiences in e-learning: Their relation to learning achievements and course satisfaction. Computer & Education, 54(1), 222-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.08.005
  31. Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306
  32. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717-731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
  33. Przybylla, M., & Romeike, R. (2014). Physical Computing and its Scope-Towards a Constructionist Computer Science Curriculum with Physical Computing. Informatics in Education, 13(2), 241-254. https://doi.org/10.15388/infedu.2014.05
  34. Reynolds, A. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). A structural model of science achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(1), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.83.1.97
  35. Schulz, S. (2016). Improving Scientific Inquiry through Physical Computing. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research (pp. 289-290). ACM.
  36. Seok, I. B. (2008). Analyzing Characters of the Learning Flow. Journal of Educational Technology, 24(1), 187-212.
  37. Simpkins, S. D., Davis-Kean, P. E., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental psychology, 42(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
  38. Song, K., & Hur, E. J. (2009). A Study on Exploring Parents and School Factors Influencing High School Students' Authentic Achievement. The Korea Association of Yeolin Education, 17, 103-126.
  39. Taskinen, P. H., Schutte, K., & Prenzel, M. (2013). Adolescents' motivation to select an academic science- related career: the role of school factors, individual interest, and science self-concept. Educational Research and Evaluation, 19(8), 717-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803611.2013.853620