DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Surface changes of metal alloys and high-strength ceramics after ultrasonic scaling and intraoral polishing

  • Yoon, Hyung-In (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Hyo-Mi (Department of Clinical Oral Health Science Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Park, Eun-Jin (Department of Dentistry, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2016.08.24
  • 심사 : 2017.01.10
  • 발행 : 2017.06.30

초록

PURPOSE. This study was to evaluate the effect of repeated ultrasonic scaling and surface polishing with intraoral polishing kits on the surface roughness of three different restorative materials. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A total of 15 identical discs were fabricated with three different materials. The ultrasonic scaling was conducted for 20 seconds on the test surfaces. Subsequently, a multi-step polishing with recommended intraoral polishing kit was performed for 30 seconds. The 3D profiler and scanning electron microscopy were used to investigate surface integrity before scaling (pristine), after scaling, and after surface polishing for each material. Non-parametric Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests were employed to statistically evaluate surface roughness changes of the pristine, scaled, and polished specimens. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS. Surface roughness values before scaling (pristine), after scaling, and polishing of the metal alloys were $3.02{\pm}0.34{\mu}m$, $2.44{\pm}0.72{\mu}m$, and $3.49{\pm}0.72{\mu}m$, respectively. Surface roughness of lithium disilicate increased from $2.35{\pm}1.05{\mu}m$ (pristine) to $28.54{\pm}9.64{\mu}m$ (scaling), and further increased after polishing ($56.66{\pm}9.12{\mu}m$, P<.05). The zirconia showed the most increase in roughness after scaling (from $1.65{\pm}0.42{\mu}m$ to $101.37{\pm}18.75{\mu}m$), while its surface roughness decreased after polishing ($29.57{\pm}18.86{\mu}m$, P<.05). CONCLUSION. Ultrasonic scaling significantly changed the surface integrities of lithium disilicate and zirconia. Surface polishing with multi-step intraoral kit after repeated scaling was only effective for the zirconia, while it was not for lithium disilicate.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Axelsson P, Nystrom B, Lindhe J. The long-term effect of a plaque control program on tooth mortality, caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 30 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol 2004;31:749-57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2004.00563.x
  2. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. Effect of controlled oral hygiene procedures on caries and periodontal disease in adults. Results after 6 years. J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:239-48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb02035.x
  3. Axelsson P, Lindhe J. The significance of maintenance care in the treatment of periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol 1981; 8:281-94. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1981.tb02039.x
  4. Pameijer CH, Stallard RE, Hiep N. Surface characteristics of teeth following periodontal instrumentation: a scanning electron microscope study. J Periodontol 1972;43:628-33. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1972.43.10.628
  5. Breininger DR, O'Leary TJ, Blumenshine RV. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus. J Periodontol 1987;58:9-18. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1987.58.1.9
  6. Sherman PR, Hutchens LH Jr, Jewson LG, Moriarty JM, Greco GW, McFall WT Jr. The effectiveness of subgingival scaling and root planning. I. Clinical detection of residual calculus. J Periodontol 1990;61:3-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1990.61.1.3
  7. Drisko CH. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one? Dent Clin North Am 1998;42:229-44.
  8. Kerry GJ. Roughness of root surfaces after use of ultrasonic instruments and hand curettes. J Periodontol 1967;38:340-6. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1967.38.4.340
  9. Busslinger A, Lampe K, Beuchat M, Lehmann B. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument. J Clin Periodontol 2001;28:642-9. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2001.028007642.x
  10. Oliveira G, Macedo PD, Tsurumaki JN, Sampaio JE, Marcantonio R. The effect of the angle of instrumentation of the Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler on root surfaces. Int J Dent Hyg 2016;14:184-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/idh.12134
  11. Wilkinson RF, Maybury JE. Scanning electron microscopy of the root surface following instrumentation. J Periodontol 1973;44:559-63. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1973.44.9.559
  12. Kawai K, Urano M. Adherence of plaque components to different restorative materials. Oper Dent 2001;26:396-400.
  13. Quirynen M, Bollen CM. The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol 1995;22:1-14.
  14. Yilmaz C, Korkmaz T, Demirkoprulu H, Ergun G, Ozkan Y. Color stability of glazed and polished dental porcelains. J Prosthodont 2008;17:20-4.
  15. Aykent F, Yondem I, Ozyesil AG, Gunal SK, Avunduk MC, Ozkan S. Effect of different finishing techniques for restorative materials on surface roughness and bacterial adhesion. J Prosthet Dent 2010;103:221-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(10)60034-0
  16. Weaks LM, Lescher NB, Barnes CM, Holroyd SV. Clinical evaluation of the Prophy-Jet as an instrument for routine removal of tooth stain and plaque. J Periodontol 1984;55:486-8. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.1984.55.8.486
  17. Lee SG, Lim SB, Chung CH, Kwon SH. Analysis of surface form change after performing prophylaxis procedure on implant surface using various oral hygiene instruments. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2004;34:1-17. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2004.34.1.1
  18. Lee AR, Chung CH, Jung GU, Pang EK. The effect of copper alloy scaler tip on the surface roughness of dental implant and restorative materials. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2014; 52:177-185. https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2014.52.3.177
  19. Brecker SC. Porcelain baked to gold-A new medium in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1956;6:801-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(56)90077-4
  20. Della Bona A, Mecholsky JJ, Barrett AA, Griggs JA. Characterization of glass-infiltrated alumina-based ceramics. Dent Mater 2008;24:1568-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.06.005
  21. Kang JI, Heo YR, Lee MS, Son MK. Understanding and trends of esthetic treatment in prosthodontics: IPS e.max. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014;14:447-52. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.04.447
  22. Raigrodski AJ. Clinical and laboratory considerations for the use of CAD/CAM Y-TZP-based restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2003;15:469-76.
  23. Conrad HJ, Seong WJ, Pesun IJ. Current ceramic materials and systems with clinical recommendations: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent 2007;98:389-404. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60124-3
  24. Kang JI, Heo YR, Lee MS, Son MK. Understanding and trends of esthetic treatment in prosthodontics: part 2. Zirconia. J Korean Soc Dent Hyg 2014;14:617-22. https://doi.org/10.13065/jksdh.2014.14.05.617
  25. Volpato CAM, Fredel MC, Philippi AG, Petter CO. Ceramic materials and color in dentistry. INTECH Open Access Publisher; 2010.
  26. Lee SC, Chung CH, Yim SB. The stereomicroscope and SPM study on the marginal change of porcelain crown in various repeated instrumentations for periodontal therapy. J Korean Acad Periodontol 2000;30:455-70. https://doi.org/10.5051/jkape.2000.30.2.455
  27. Vigolo P, Buzzo O, Buzzo M, Mutinelli S. An in vitro evaluation of alumina, zirconia, and lithium disilicate surface roughness caused by two scaling instruments. J Prosthodont 2015 Dec 18.
  28. Patterson CJ, McLundie AC, Stirrups DR, Taylor WG. Efficacy of a porcelain refinishing system in restoring surface finish after grinding with fine and extra-fine diamond burs. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:402-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90400-5
  29. Ward MT, Tate WH, Powers JM. Surface roughness of opalescent porcelains after polishing. Oper Dent 1995;20:106-10.
  30. Chu FC, Frankel N, Smales RJ. Surface roughness and flexural strength of self-glazed, polished, and reglazed In-Ceram/Vitadur Alpha porcelain laminates. Int J Prosthodont 2000; 13:66-71.
  31. Vrochari AD, Petropoulou A, Chronopoulos V, Polydorou O, Massey W, Hellwig E. Evaluation of surface roughness of ceramic and resin composite material used for conservative indirect restorations, after repolishing by intraoral means. J Prosthodont 2015 Oct 21.
  32. Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. The surface roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1991;70:1299-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345910700091301
  33. Haywood VB, Heymann HO, Scurria MS. Effects of water, speed, and experimental instrumentation on finishing and polishing porcelain intra-orally. Dent Mater 1989;5:185-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(89)90011-0
  34. Odatsu T, Jimbo R, Wennerberg A, Watanabe I, Sawase T. Effect of polishing and finishing procedures on the surface integrity of restorative ceramics. Am J Dent 2013;26:51-5.
  35. Sasahara RM, Ribeiro Fda C, Cesar PF, Yoshimura HN. Influence of the finishing technique on surface roughness of dental porcelains with different microstructures. Oper Dent 2006;31:577-83. https://doi.org/10.2341/05-104
  36. Amaya-Pajares SP, Ritter AV, Vera Resendiz C, Henson BR, Culp L, Donovan TE. Effect of Finishing and Polishing on the Surface Roughness of Four Ceramic Materials after Occlusal Adjustment. J Esthet Restor Dent 2016;28:382-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12222
  37. Preis V, Grumser K, Schneider-Feyrer S, Behr M, Rosentritt M. The effectiveness of polishing kits: influence on surface roughness of zirconia. Int J Prosthodont 2015;28:149-51. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.4153