The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of the marginal and internal gaps of three different dental prostheses: comparison of the silicone replica technique and three-dimensional superimposition analysis

  • Park, Jin-Young (Institute for Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Bae, So-Yeon (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Lee, Jae-Jun (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Ji-Hwan (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Hae-Young (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University) ;
  • Kim, Woong-Chul (Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering, College of Health Science, Korea University)
  • Received : 2016.07.25
  • Accepted : 2017.03.21
  • Published : 2017.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the marginal and internal gaps, and the potential clinical applications of three different methods of dental prostheses fabrication, and to compare the prostheses prepared using the silicone replica technique (SRT) and those prepared using the three-dimensional superimposition analysis (3DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS. Five Pekkton, lithium disilicate, and zirconia crowns were each manufactured and tested using both the SRT and the two-dimensional section of the 3DSA. The data were analyzed with the nonparametric version of a two-way analysis of variance using rank-transformed values and the Tukey's post-hoc test (${\alpha}=.05$). RESULTS. Significant differences were observed between the fabrication methods in the marginal gap (P < .010), deep chamfer (P < .001), axial wall (P < .001), and occlusal area (P < .001). A significant difference in the occlusal area was found between the two measurement methods (P < .030), whereas no significant differences were found in the marginal gap (P > .350), deep chamfer (P > .719), and axial wall (P > .150). As the 3DSA method is three-dimensional, it allows for the measurement of arbitrary points. CONCLUSION. All of the three fabrication methods are valid for measuring clinical objectives because they produced prostheses within the clinically acceptable range. Furthermore, a three-dimensional superimposition analysis verification method such as the silicone replica technique is also applicable in clinical settings.

Keywords

References

  1. Abduo J, Lyons K, Bennamoun M. Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams. Int J Dent 2014;2014:783948.
  2. Bosch G, Ender A, Mehl A. A 3-dimensional accuracy analysis of chairside CAD/CAM milling processes. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1425-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.012
  3. Fabbri G, Zarone F, Dellificorelli G, Cannistraro G, De Lorenzi M, Mosca A, Sorrentino R. Clinical evaluation of 860 anterior and posterior lithium disilicate restorations: retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 3 years and a maximum observational period of 6 years. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2014;34:165-77. https://doi.org/10.11607/prd.1769
  4. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials 1999;20:1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(98)00010-6
  5. Ueda K, Guth JF, Erdelt K, Stimmelmayr M, Kappert H, Beuer F. Light transmittance by a multi-coloured zirconia material. Dent Mater J 2015;34:310-4. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2014-238
  6. Thieme K, Russel C. Nucleation and growth kinetics and phase analysis in zirconia-containing lithium disilicate glass. J Mater Sci 2015;50:1488-99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-014-8710-5
  7. Almeida e Silva JS, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Araujo E, Stimmelmayr M, Vieira LC, Guth JF. Marginal and internal fit of four-unit zirconia fixed dental prostheses based on digital and conventional impression techniques. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18:515-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-013-0987-2
  8. Komine F, Blatz MB, Matsumura H. Current status of zirconia-based fixed restorations. J Oral Sci 2010;52:531-9. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.52.531
  9. Kang SH, Chang J, Son HH. Flexural strength and microstructure of two lithium disilicate glass ceramics for CAD/CAM restoration in the dental clinic. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38:134-40. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.3.134
  10. Oh GJ, Yun KD, Lee KM, Lim HP, Park SW. Sintering behavior and mechanical properties of zirconia compacts fabricated by uniaxial press forming. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:81-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2010.2.3.81
  11. Fuhrmann G, Steiner M, Freitag-Wolf S, Kern M. Resin bonding to three types of polyaryletherketones (PAEKs)-durability and influence of surface conditioning. Dent Mater 2014;30:357-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.12.008
  12. Schwitalla A, Muller WD. PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. J Oral Implantol 2013;39:743-9. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00002
  13. Kurtz SM, Devine JN. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials 2007;28:4845-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
  14. Tetelman ED, Babbush CA. A new transitional abutment for immediate aesthetics and function. Implant Dent 2008;17:51-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/ID.0b013e318167648c
  15. Mark HF. Encyclopedia of polymer science and technology, concise. John Wiley & Sons, 2013, p. 5-1376.
  16. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR. Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2013;101:1209-16. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.b.32932
  17. Rudolph H, Luthardt RG, Walter MH. Computer-aided analysis of the influence of digitizing and surfacing on the accuracy in dental CAD/CAM technology. Comput Biol Med 2007; 37:579-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2006.05.006
  18. Luthardt R, Weber A, Rudolph H, Schone C, Quaas S, Walter M. Design and production of dental prosthetic restorations: basic research on dental CAD/CAM technology. Int J Comput Dent 2002;5:165-76.
  19. Beuer F, Schweiger J, Edelhoff D. Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD/CAM generated restorations. Br Dent J 2008;204:505-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2008.350
  20. Garcia-Barbosa JA, Arroyo-Osorio JM, Cordoba-Nieto E. The manufacture of a maxillofacial prosthesis from an axial tomography using simulation technologies with a virtual machine tool and four-axis machining. Dyna 2016;83:100-5. https://doi.org/10.15446/dyna.v83n196.49662
  21. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry I, Thomas GW, Qian F. 3D and 2D marginal fit of pressed and CAD/CAM lithium disilicate crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthodont 2014;23:610-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12180
  22. Raju SR. Comparison of marginal fit of zirconium oxide copings generated using four different CAD-CAM systems: an in vitro study. J Res Adv Dent 2013;3:163-71.
  23. Tamac E, Toksavul S, Toman M. Clinical marginal and internal adaptation of CAD/CAM milling, laser sintering, and cast metal ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:909-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.12.020
  24. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  25. Park JY, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim JH, Kim WC. Comparison of prosthetic models produced by traditional and additive manufacturing methods. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:294-302. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.294
  26. Meng Z, Yao XS, Yao H, Liang Y, Liu T, Li Y, Wang G, Lan S. Measurement of the refractive index of human teeth by optical coherence tomography. J Biomed Opt 2009;14:034010. https://doi.org/10.1117/1.3130322
  27. American National Standards Institute/American Dental Association. ANSI/ADA specification No. 19. Dental elastomeric impression materials. ISO 4823:2000. Chicago: American Dental Association, 2004. Available at: http://www.iso.ch/iso/en/prods-services/ISOstore/store.html.
  28. Bayramoglu E, Ozkan YK, Yildiz C. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of press-on-metal and conventional ceramic systems for three- and four-unit implant-supported partial fixed dental prostheses: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:52-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.01.002
  29. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  30. Park JY, Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Bae SY, Kim JH, Kim WC. In vitro assessment of the marginal and internal fits of interim implant restorations fabricated with different methods. J Prosthet Dent 2016;116:536-542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.03.012
  31. Meyer BJ, Mormann WH, Lutz F. Optimization of the powder application in the Cerec method with environmentfriendly propellant systems. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:1462-8.
  32. Kim HH, Lee JW, Cha KS, Chung DH, Lee SM. Threedimensional assessment of upper lip positional changes according to simulated maxillary anterior tooth movements by white light scanning. Korean J Orthod 2014;44:281-93. https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2014.44.6.281
  33. Kuo RF, Chen SJ, Wong TY, Lu BC, Huang ZH. Digital morphology comparisons between models of conventional intraoral casting and digital rapid prototyping. 5th International Conference on Biomedical Engineering in Vietnam 2015;46: 478-80.
  34. Bae SY, Park JY, Jeong ID, Kim HY, Kim JH, Kim WC. Three-dimensional analysis of marginal and internal fit of copings fabricated with polyetherketoneketone (PEKK) and zirconia. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:106-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.07.005
  35. Persson AS, Andersson M, Oden A, Sandborgh-Englund G. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology. Dent Mater 2008;24:1123-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.01.008
  36. Schaefer O, Kuepper H, Thompson GA, Cachovan G, Hefti AF, Guentsch A. Effect of CNC-milling on the marginal and internal fit of dental ceramics: a pilot study. Dent Mater 2013; 29:851-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2013.04.018
  37. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007;39: 175-91. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
  38. Jeon JH, Choi BY, Kim CM, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Three-dimensional evaluation of the repeatability of scanned conventional impressions of prepared teeth generated with white- and blue-light scanners. J Prosthet Dent 2015;114:549-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.04.019
  39. Anadioti E, Aquilino SA, Gratton DG, Holloway JA, Denry IL, Thomas GW, Qian F. Internal fit of pressed and computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing ceramic crowns made from digital and conventional impressions. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:304-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.015
  40. Flugge TV, Schlager S, Nelson K, Nahles S, Metzger MC. Precision of intraoral digital dental impressions with iTero and extraoral digitization with the iTero and a model scanner. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013;144:471-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.04.017
  41. Nedelcu RG, Persson AS. Scanning accuracy and precision in 4 intraoral scanners: an in vitro comparison based on 3-dimensional analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2014;112:1461-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.027
  42. Katsoulis J, Mericske-Stern R, Rotkina L, Zbaren C, Enkling N, Blatz MB. Precision of fit of implant-supported screw-retained 10-unit computer-aided-designed and computer-aidedmanufactured frameworks made from zirconium dioxide and titanium: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25: 165-74.
  43. Guess PC, Vagkopoulou T, Zhang Y, Wolkewitz M, Strub JR. Marginal and internal fit of heat pressed versus CAD/CAM fabricated all-ceramic onlays after exposure to thermo-mechanical fatigue. J Dent 2014;42:199-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.10.002
  44. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131: 107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  45. Bindl A, Mormann WH. Marginal and internal fit of all-ceramic CAD/CAM crown-copings on chamfer preparations. J Oral Rehabil 2005;32:441-7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01446.x
  46. Ortorp A, Jonsson D, Mouhsen A, Vult von Steyern P. The fit of cobalt-chromium three-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated with four different techniques: a comparative in vitro study. Dent Mater 2011;27:356-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2010.11.015
  47. Kahramanoglu E, Kulak-Ozkan Y. Marginal and internal adaptation of different superstructure and abutment materials using two different implant systems for five-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:1207-16. https://doi.org/10.11607/jomi.2744
  48. Hamza TA, Ezzat HA, El-Hossary MM, Katamish HA, Shokry TE, Rosenstiel SF. Accuracy of ceramic restorations made with two CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent 2013; 109:83-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60020-7
  49. Song TJ, Kwon TK, Yang JH, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH, Yeo IS. Marginal fit of anterior 3-unit fixed partial zirconia restorations using different CAD/CAM systems. J Adv Prosthodont 2013;5:219-25. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2013.5.3.219
  50. Lins L, Bemfica V, Queiroz C, Canabarro A. In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD/CAM zirconia copings. J Prosthet Dent 2015;113:205-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.09.010
  51. Neves FD, Prado CJ, Prudente MS, Carneiro TA, Zancope K, Davi LR, Mendonca G, Cooper LF, Soares CJ. Microcomputed tomography evaluation of marginal fit of lithium disilicate crowns fabricated by using chairside CAD/CAM systems or the heat-pressing technique. J Prosthet Dent 2014; 112:1134-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.04.028
  52. Jeong ID, Lee JJ, Jeon JH, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2016;115:755-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.11.007
  53. Ji MK, Park JH, Park SW, Yun KD, Oh GJ, Lim HP. Evaluation of marginal fit of 2 CAD-CAM anatomic contour zirconia crown systems and lithium disilicate glass-ceramic crown. J Adv Prosthodont 2015;7:271-7. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.4.271

Cited by

  1. Evaluation of adaptation of ceramic inlays using optical coherence tomography and replica technique vol.32, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.vol32.0005
  2. Evaluation of marginal discrepancy of pressable ceramic veneer fabricated using CAD/CAM system: Additive and subtractive manufacturing vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.347
  3. Accuracy of provisional crowns made using stereolithography apparatus and subtractive technique vol.10, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.5.354
  4. Evaluation of the reproducibility of various abutments using a blue light model scanner vol.10, pp.4, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2018.10.4.328
  5. Digital microscopic evaluation of vertical marginal discrepancies of CAD/CAM fabricated zirconia cores vol.0, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1515/bmt-2017-0234
  6. A Comparison Study of Marginal and Internal Fit Assessment Methods for Fixed Dental Prostheses vol.8, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8060785
  7. 절삭 및 적층 가공법으로 제작된 3본 고정성 국소의치의 변연 및 내면 적합도에 관한 연구 vol.58, pp.1, 2020, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2020.58.1.7
  8. 구강인기법과 왁스블록의 종류에 따른 금속 코핑의 변연적합도 비교 vol.42, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14347/jtd.2020.42.3.234
  9. Effect of Die Materials on Marginal and Internal Adaptation of Zirconia Copings: An In Vitro Study vol.15, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2174/1874210602115010708
  10. Effect of rinsing time on the accuracy of interim crowns fabricated by digital light processing: An in vitro study vol.13, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2021.13.1.24
  11. Wear Resistance, Color Stability and Displacement Resistance of Milled PEEK Crowns Compared to Zirconia Crowns under Stimulated Chewing and High-Performance Aging vol.13, pp.21, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13213761
  12. Rehabilitation of severely-destructed endodontically treated premolar teeth with novel endocrown system: Biomechanical behavior assessment through 3D finite element and in vitro analyses vol.126, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2021.105031