DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Community Engagement for Regeneration and Re-use of Modern Architecture - Focused on the Case of DIY Renovation by Private Sector in Fukuoka, Japan -

근현대 건축물의 재생 및 활용을 위한 지역주체의 참여 특성에 관한 연구 - 일본 후쿠오카 DIY 리노베이션 사례를 중심으로 -

  • 장민영 (한양대학교 대학원 첨단건축도시환경공학과) ;
  • 이명훈 (한양대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2017.02.01
  • Accepted : 2017.06.12
  • Published : 2017.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the regeneration and re-use of modern architecture through community engagement. The deterioration of aging buildings causes that they are becoming vacant and left unmanaged. As a result, the property values and the surrounding environment have declined. For sustainable management of modern architecture, the value and usefulness in the modern society need to be improved. To address this issue, this study focuses on the case of Fukuoka DIY renovation in Japan started by private-driven activities. This study was conducted in three parts. First, it classified the types of activities and actors related to the regeneration and re-use of modern architecture in Fukuoka. Second, it analyzed the relationship and characteristics of activities investigated using the DEMATEL method. Third, it examined the performance capability of stakeholders by drawing the Power-Interest Matrix. The case of Fukuoka DIY renovation shows that the private-driven projects have been extended to the civic groups' activities accompanied with diverse programs and regional expansion. The case indicates the importance of each actors' role and status who involve each activity concerning the regeneration and re-use of modern architecture. In particular, the civic groups perform a role as an intermediary actor to connect a variety of actors and their activities. The community engagement will contribute to sustainable management including the re-use of aging buildings and urban regeneration.

Keywords

References

  1. Eden, C. & Ackermann, F. (1998). Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management, London: Sage Publications.
  2. Friedman, A. L. & Miles, S. (2006). Stakeholders: Theory and Practice, Kettering: Oxford University Press.
  3. Hong, S. Y. & Kim, K. S. (2008). A Study on the Conservation and Regeneration of Modern Cultural Heritage in Busan Region, Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea, 10(3), 35-46.
  4. Jang, M. Y., Park, S. H. & Lee, M. H. (2017). Conservation Management of Private-owned Historical Assets by Community Involvement, Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.53
  5. Kang, D. J. (2013). Exploring a Definition of Urban Heritage with focused on Urban Regeneration, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 48(6), 253-267.
  6. Kim, C. Y. (2014). A Study on the Preservation and Application of the Historic-Cultural Heritages in Daegue Eupseong, Urban Design, 15(3), 47-60.
  7. Kim, H. J. (2013). A Comparative Study on Creation Network of Mullae in Seoul, Daein Art Market in Gwangju, Totatoga in Busan, Seoul Studies, 14(3), 159-173.
  8. Kim, J. H. (2015). Use of Architectural Assets for Sustainable Cities, Review of Architecture and Building Science, 59(4), 50-51.
  9. Kim, K. H. (2006). Roles of the Local Government in the Historic Preservation, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 41(5), 131-146.
  10. Kwon, Y. S. (2011). A Comparative Analysis on Participatory Goverance for District-based Historic and Cultural Environment, Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 27(4), 239-248.
  11. Lee, J. H. & Jang, S. H. (2006). A Study on the Application and Conservation in the Modern Architecture of Korea, Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 22(3), 107-115.
  12. Lim, T., Ishida, J. & Kim, T. (2004). A Case Study on the Commercial Renovation for the Registered Cultural Properties of Modern Architecture in Kyoto, Journal of The Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning & Design, 20(7), 121-128.
  13. Lim, D. S. & Kim, J. B. (2015). A Case Study on Cooperative Relationship between the Participations in Cultural Revitalization, Journal of Korea Planning Association, 50(3), 225-242.
  14. Okawa, N. & Yasumichi, M. (2006). Preseravtion and Utilization of Historic Heritage, Kyoto: Gakugei Publications.
  15. Park, C. H. (2012). Analyses on NPO's Activities and Issues for the Preservation and Reuse of Historic Buildings, Urban Design, 13(6), 137-157.
  16. Park, S. H., Soda. O. & Choi, S. Y. (2011). A Structured Analysis of Urban Decay Problem by DEMATEL, Korea Real Estate Academy Review, 46, 321-337.
  17. Ryu, H. S. & Kim, D. N. (2010). A Study on Urban Design Methodology for Preservation and Reuse of a Modern Historic Building, Urban Design, 11(3), 77-92.
  18. Shin, W. J. & Lee, S. S. (2014). A Study on the Preservation Method of Modern Registered Architectural Cultural Properties, Journal of Korean Institute of Rural Architecture, 16(1), 119-127. https://doi.org/10.14577/kirua.2014.16.1.119
  19. Taguchi T. (2006). Institutional Process Design for Citizen-centered Community Development, Ph.D. Dissertation, Waseda University.
  20. Fukuoka DIY Renovation Week 2016, http://fdrw2016.strikingly.com/
  21. Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, http://www.soumu.go.jp/
  22. NPO Fukuoka Building Stock Research Group, http://www.npo-fbs.com/
  23. Space R Design, http://www.space-r.net/
  24. Yoshihara Jutaku, http://www.tenjinpark.com/