Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of Residents Satisfaction on Government-Initiated Community Housing - Focusing on the Seoul Government Cases -

공공주도형 공동체주택의 주거만족도 연구 - 서울시 사례를 중심으로 -

  • 장용준 (서울시립대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 유석연 (서울시립대학교 도시공학과)
  • Received : 2016.06.30
  • Accepted : 2017.01.12
  • Published : 2017.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Various factors, such as the increase of single and two-person households, struggling to pay for housing and living, aging and low birth-rates, have contributed to the interest in community housing. Community housing initiated by Seoul city government is for the purpose of the housing supply of low housing expenses and customized housing by household-type. Compared with the view from the supplier of the precedent researches for the community housing, this study starts from the background that it has to study in the position of the residents living directly for the community housing activation. The object of study analyze the residents satisfaction on community housing which is initiated by Seoul city government after 2013. The results of this study as the followings; firstly, Government-Initiated Community Housing coincide with the purpose of housing expense savings, but Having critical mind about additional expenses for housing management operation after move-in. Secondly, Both private-public co-initiated land-lease community housing and public initiated rental housing get start from the organization of cooperative. The satisfaction of private-public co-initiated community housing is generally high because of well-customized housing construction and the community organization after move-in. Thirdly, Depending on the target or type, the role of public sector needs to be diverse and clear. In addition to this, it is necessary to consider for housing operation and revenue generation. Reflecting the interest of community housing, this study provides the implication in that the satisfaction of the public-led community housing makes little difference with public rental housing except the organization of cooperative and the residents-oriented decision making process before and after housing construction.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, C. (2014). A Study on the Dwelling Satisfaction Level by Types of Public Rental House, Gachon University, 1-161.
  2. Choi, J. (2013). Senior Cohousing in Scandinavian countries by Community based housing, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 8(2), 20.
  3. Cohousing Research Network. (2015). Cohousing Research Network 2015 Presentation, Cohousing Research Network, 1-93.
  4. Eo, M. (2016). A Comparative Analysis on Demand Characteristics of the Households of Public Rental Housing and Private Rental Housing, University of Seoul, viii, 19.
  5. Han, K. (2006). A Study on the determinants of residential satisfaction of public rental housing tenants, Seoul National University, iv, 24.
  6. Jo, I. & Shin, H. (2009). A Study on the Planning of Co-housing through case study and survey with experts, The Journal of Natural Sciences, 19, 1-17.
  7. Joung, K. & Lee, J. (2013). Study and analysis of Korea cohousing cases, Proceeding of Annual Conference of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 33(1), 205-206.
  8. Kim, D. (2015). A Study of a Shared Housing and Planning Criteria: Focusing on the Domestic Implications and Institutional Analysis of Foreign Shared Housings, Journal of the Korean Housing Association, 26(1), 139-150. https://doi.org/10.6107/JKHA.2015.26.1.139
  9. Kim, R. (2012). The social and economic Feasibility of Korean-style Housing Cooperatives and the Institutional Improvement Measures, Sejong University, xii
  10. Kim, R. (2014). The Role of Housing Cooperatives in the Process of Neighborhood Regeneration, Journal of the Korea Contents Association, 14(6), 417-427. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.06.417
  11. Lee, E. (2014). [Public Architect of Seoul]Examples of Design Project through the Seoul Architect's Work for Public Market: Focusing on Cooperative Public Housing cases, Architecture & Society of Korea Architects Institute, 26(2), 59-65.
  12. Lee, E. (2015). [Project Report] Mallidong Cooperative Public Housing, Architectural Institute of Korea, 59(9), 69-72.
  13. NSW Federation of Housing Associations. (2014). Community housing tenant satisfaction benchmarking, NSW Federation of Housing Associations, 1-12.
  14. Ryu, K. & Suh, S. (2013). Tasks and Policy Implications of Housing Cooperatives in Terms of Social Capital, Seoul Studies, 14(4), 243-262.
  15. The Seoul Institute. (2014). 'Customized Housing-solution in Period of Single-household' The Activation of Social-rent Community Housing, The Seoul Institute, 1-26.
  16. V. M. Dolye. (1990). The Effect of Tenure Type, Age Mix and Subjective Housing Variables on Housing Satisfaction and Wellbeing of Older Residents, Simon Fraser University.
  17. You, S. & Kim, H. (2014). Housing Cooperatives in Risks: the Case of Canada, Housing Studies Review, 22(4), 95-115.