Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design (대한건축학회논문집:계획계)

Architectural Institute of Korea (대한건축학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposing a Pedagogic Process of Digital Modeling for Performance-Oriented Design

성능지향적 설계를 위한 디지털 모델링 교육 프로세스 제안 - 기초 디자인 교육의 연속성 모델을 활용하여 -

  • Received : 2016.10.12
  • Accepted : 2017.05.22
  • Published : 2017.06.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As a lot of programs specialized for various purposes come out, digital models are replacing the role of physical models as design media. Digital model plays a central role in the building design process, so the education of digital modeling needs to be designed considering its potential and features. Still, however, in a lot of educational environments, students are provided with focused on acquiring functions of a particular software, which makes them imitating a way of traditional modeling. As a result, students waste time and effort producing digital models of only-once nature, rigidity, and integration, which are opposed to the main features of the digital model including multi-purpose, dynamic, and reusability. Therefore, the systematic methodology is needed to help students understand the principles and utilities of digital modeling and apply them to their design. This research aims at proposing a pedagogic process of digital modeling for performance-oriented design. The research introduces the continuity model of basic design coursework to form a pedagogic model for digital modeling. While experiencing a series of projects including Lampshade, Waffle-structured chair, and Voronoi mass, students understand the concept of form-finding, performance-oriented design, and digital fabrication.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : 한국연구재단

References

  1. Agkathidis, A. (2015). Generative Design: Form-finding Techniques in Architecture. London, Laurence King Publishing, 13.
  2. Celani, G. & Vaz, C. (2012). CAD scripting and visual programming languages for implementing computational design concepts: A comparison from a pedagogical point of view. International Journal of Architectural Computing, 10(1), 121-138. https://doi.org/10.1260/1478-0771.10.1.121
  3. Choi, D. (2010). A Study on the Process of Architectural Design Studio as a Formative Design Education. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 11(11), 4623-4628. https://doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2010.11.11.4623
  4. DeLanda, M. (2001). 'Philosophies of design: The case of modeling software', Alejandro Zaera-Polo and Jorge Wagensberg(eds), Verb: Architecture Boogazine, Actar(Barcelona), 139.
  5. Ganshirt, C. (2007). Tools for Ideas: An Introduction to Architectural Design. translated by Michael Robinson. Basel, Boston, Berlin: Birkhauser.
  6. Garber, R. (2014). BIM Design: Realising the Creative Potential of Building Information Modelling (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
  7. Hassan, Q. (2011). "Demystifying Cloud Computing". The Journal of Defense Software Engineering. CrossTalk. 2011 (Jan/Feb): 16-21.
  8. Hensel, M. & Menges, A. (2008). Inclusive Performance: Efficiency Versus Effectiveness Towards a Morpho‐Ecological Approach for Design. Architectural Design, 78(2), 54-63. https://doi.org/10.1002/ad.642
  9. Holland, J. (1992). Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  10. Hwang, J. (2013). An Experiment of Situated Learning on BIM Education in Architecture - Based on a Student-centered Workshop Case -Journal of Digital Design 13(2), 409-419. https://doi.org/10.17280/jdd.2013.13.2.040
  11. Ishii, H. (2008, February). Tangible bits: beyond pixels. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Tangible and embedded interaction (pp. xv-xxv). ACM.
  12. Iwamoto, L. (2013). Digital fabrications: architectural and material techniques. Princeton Architectural Press.
  13. Kal, D. (1982). "Continuity In Basic Design Coursework." in Teaching Architecture: Proceedings of the 69th Annual Meeting of the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture. ACSA Pub.
  14. Kim, S. (1997). On the Role of Modeling in the Education of Computer-Aided Architectural Design, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design 13(7), 37-43.
  15. Kim, S. (2002). Architects of Information Age, Review of Architecture and Building Science 46(6), 20-26.
  16. Kim, S. (2012). Digital Architecture and BIM, Review of Architecture and Building Science 56(11), 15-18.
  17. Kim, S. (2015). Media and tool, View on pedagogy of architectural design, JUDGMENT OF ARCHITECTURE: ARCHITECTURAL CRITICS COMMUNITY, 3, 299-321, JEONGYE publishing Company.
  18. Kim, S. & Park, M. (1991). Basic Design Course in Architectural Education, Review of Architecture and Building Science 35(6), 27-33.
  19. Kolarevic, B. & Malkawi, A. (Eds.). (2005). Peformative Architecture. Routledge.
  20. Mitchell, W. (1978). The theoretical foundation of computer-aided architectural design, Environment and Planning B, 2(2), 127 - 150. https://doi.org/10.1068/b020127
  21. Mitchell, W., Liggett, R. & Tan, M. (1990). Top-Down Architectural Design. The Electronic Design Studio, 14-1.
  22. Shin, D. & Kim, S. (2007). A Methodology to Introduce the Digital Chain into the Education of Computer Aided Architectural Design, Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, Planning and Design 23(11), 181-188.
  23. Verlinden, J. & Horvath, I. (2008). Enabling interactive augmented prototyping by a portable hardware and a plug-in-based software architecture. STROJNISKI VESTNIK, 54(6), 458-470.