DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Consumer Preferences on Social Commerce Buying Environment

구매시점을 중심으로 소셜커머스 구매환경이 미치는 소비자 선호 별 효용 분석

  • Received : 2016.08.23
  • Accepted : 2017.03.16
  • Published : 2017.05.31

Abstract

Based on increased popularity and use of social network services as a marketing tool, social commerce became an emerging trend in e-commerce platforms. Social commerce involves sellers offering potential consumers the products and services at a lower price in a limited time period. Through comparison of the performances of domestic social commerce websites, we found that the buying environment such as price, number of available products, and the remaining time period for sale has a significant difference influencing on the purchase decisions of consumers. This study aims to analyze the interaction effects and preference levels of four characteristics (price, discount rate, number of purchases and purchase time) by conducting choice-based conjoint analysis. Survey experiment was performed using a sample of 146 undergraduate and graduate students. The results showed that consumers importantly consider purchase time, discount rate, price, number of purchases in the order of their preference. Also, discount effect is more significant on purchase decisions than price effect and consumers distinguish less the differences among the buying environment characteristics in the closing days of purchase period. Customer segmentation using the preference levels of characteristics indicates that the preference levels have different effects in the purchase utility of each segment. The proposed customer segmentation and differences in feature utilities are expected to be valuable in forming future sales promotion strategies in social commerce.

Keywords

References

  1. 강현모, 김지헌, "소셜커머스 이용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인에 대한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 제38권, 제2호(2013), pp.117-139. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2013.38.2.117
  2. 김국선, 이종호, "소셜커머스의 만족도와 재구매 의도에 영향을 미치는 서비스품질요인", 한국콘텐츠학회논문지, 제12권, 제3호(2012), pp.311-321. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2012.12.03.311
  3. 김승경, 이재관, "웹사이트 디자인의 시각적 요소와 유용성이 성과에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 한국경영과학회지, 제32권, 제2호(2007), pp.17-40.
  4. 김일, 손민주, "소셜커머스 패션명품 구매상황 특성이 소비자 구매행동에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구", 기초조형학연구, 제14권, 제4호(2013), pp.143-155.
  5. 김재휘, 김수정, "응답모드와 비교가능성이 선택 지연에 미치는 효과 : 소셜 커머스 상황을 중심으로", 한국심리학회 연차 학술발표논문집, 단일호(2012), pp.309-309.
  6. 김진민, 박광태, 임호순, "선택형 컨조인트 분석 (Choice-based Conjoint Analysis)을 통한 제품-서비스 통합 효과 분석", 한국경영과학회지, 제39권, 제1호(2014), pp.101-112. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2014.39.1.101
  7. 노미진, 이경탁, "소셜커머스 수용에 있어서 지각된 위험의 영향력 : 집단주의 조절효과 분석", 경영학연구, 제41권, 제1호(2012), pp.57-87.
  8. 박유진, 정유진, 장근녕, "개인화된 제품 추천을 위한 고객 행동 기반 고객 프로파일링 기법", 경영과학, 제23권, 제3호(2006), pp.183-194.
  9. 손달호, "웹사이트 이용의도에 대한 동기적 요인의 영향 : 인터넷 쇼핑몰을 중심으로", 경영과학, 제21권, 제1호(2004), pp.1-17.
  10. 유동근, 서영호, 조임현, "전자상거래의 비용우위 효과에 관한 소비자 지각 : 인터넷 쇼핑몰 이용자를 중심으로", 한국경영과학회지, 제24권, 제4호(1999), pp.49-62.
  11. 유윤수, 윤상진, 소셜커머스, 무엇이고 어떻게 활용할 것인가", 도서출판 더숲, 2011.
  12. 이경탁, 노미진, "소셜커머스 이용의 영향요인에 관한 연구", 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제11권, 제4호(2011), pp.65-85.
  13. 장경석, "풍요 속의 빈곤 소셜커머스 전망과 과제", KB금융지주 경영연구소, 2015.
  14. 정현주, 이상용, "베이지안 네트워크를 이용한 상황정보에 기반을 둔 소셜커머스 음식 쿠폰 추천시스템", 디지털융복합연구, 제11권, 제3호 (2013), pp.389-395. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDPM.2013.11.3.389
  15. 주영진, 지민성, 임종혁, "스마트폰을 이용한 위치기반 쿠폰광고의 효과", 한국경영과학회지, 제40권, 제1호(2015), pp.35-55. https://doi.org/10.7737/JKORMS.2015.40.1.035
  16. Amblee, N.C. and T.X. Bui, "Value proposition and social proof in online deals : An exploratory study of Groupon.com," of the 14th Annual International Conference on Electronic Commerce, ACM, (2012).
  17. Bettman, J.R., M.F. Luce, and J.W. Payne, "Constructive consumer choice processes," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, No.3 (1998), pp.187-217. https://doi.org/10.1086/209535
  18. Blattberg, R.C., R. Briesch, and E.J. Fox, "How promotions work," Science, No.3(1995), G122-G132.
  19. Dean, D.H. and J.M. Lang, "Comparing three signals of service quality," Journal of Services Marketing, Vol.22, No.1(2008), pp.48-58. https://doi.org/10.1108/08876040810851950
  20. Erdem, T., G. Mayhew, and B. Sun, "Understanding reference-price shoppers : A within-and cross-category analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.38, No.4(2001), pp.445-457. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.4.445.18909
  21. Erickson, G.M. and J.K. Johansson, "The role of price in multi-attribute product evaluations," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, No. 2(1985), pp.195-199. https://doi.org/10.1086/208508
  22. Granovetter, M. and R. Soong, "Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Vol.7, No.1(1986), pp.83-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(86)90023-5
  23. Green, P.E., A.M. Krieger, and M.K. Agarwal, "Adaptive conjoint analysis : Some caveats and suggestions," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.28, No.2(1991), pp.215-222. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172809
  24. Green, P.E. and V. Srinivasan, "Conjoint analysis in consumer research : Issues and outlook," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.5, No. 2(1978) pp.103-123. https://doi.org/10.1086/208721
  25. Greene, W.H., Economic analysis, Pearson Education, 2003
  26. Grewal, D., H. Marmorstein, and A. Sharma, "Communicating price information through semantic cues : The moderating effects of situation and discount size," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.23, No.2(1996), pp.148-155. https://doi.org/10.1086/209473
  27. Hagerty, M.R, "Improving the predictive power of conjoint analysis : The use of factor analysis and cluster analysis," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.22, No.2(1985), pp.168-184. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151362
  28. Häubl, G. and V. Trifts, "Consumer decision making in online shopping environments : The effects of interactive decision aids," Marketing Science, Vol.19, No.1(2000), pp.4-21. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.4.15178
  29. Hellofs, L.L. and R. Jacobson, "Market share and customers' perceptions of quality : When can firms grow their way to higher versus lower quality?," The Journal of Marketing, Vol.63, No.1(1999), pp.16-25. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251998
  30. Jeffrey, I.J., A.C. Peter, and P. Raghubir, "Framing the deal : The role of restrictions in accentuating deal value," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.24, No.1(1997), pp.68-79. https://doi.org/10.1086/209494
  31. Kuhfeld, W.F., Marketing research methods in SAS, perimental Design, Choice, Conjoint, and Graphical Techniques, Cary, NC, SAS-Institute TS-722, (2005).
  32. Li, X. and L. Wu, "Measuring effects of observational learning and social-network word-of-mouth (WOM) on the sales of daily-deal vouchers," System Sciences (HICSS), (2013).
  33. Lichtenstein, D.R., N.M. Ridgway, and R.G. Netemeyer, "Price perceptions and consumer shopping behavior : A field study," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.30, No.2(1993), pp.234-245. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172830
  34. Liu, Y. and J. Sutanto, "Buyers' purchasing time and herd behavior on deal-of-the-day group-buying websites," Electronic Markets, Vol.22, No.2(2012), pp.83-93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-012-0085-3
  35. Louviere, J.J. and G. Woodworth, "Design and analysis of simulated consumer choice or allocation experiments : An approach based on aggregate data," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.20, No.4(1983), pp.350-367. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151440
  36. Louviere, J.J., D.A. Hensher, and J.D. Swait, Stated choice methods : analysis and applications, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  37. McFadden, D., "Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior," in P. Zarembka, ed., Frontiers in Econometrics, Academic Press, New York, 1974.
  38. Parker, J.R. and R.Y. Schrift, "Rejectable choice sets : How seemingly irrelevant nochoice options affect consumer decision processes," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.48, No.5(2011), pp.840-854. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.48.5.840
  39. Raghubir, P., "Coupon value : A signal for price?," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.35, No.3(1998), pp.316-324. https://doi.org/10.2307/3152030
  40. Simonson, I., "The influence of anticipating regret and responsibility on purchase decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.19, No.1(1992), pp.105-118. https://doi.org/10.1086/209290
  41. Wittink, D.R. and P. Cattin, "Commercial use of conjoint analysis : An update," Journal of Marketing, Vol.53, No. 3(1989), pp.91-96. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251345
  42. Wright, P., "The harassed decision maker : Time pressures, distractions, and the use of evidence," Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol.59, No.5(1974), p.555. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037186