정보교육학회논문지 (Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education)

  • 제21권2호
  • /
  • Pages.231-245
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1229-3245(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2733-8428(eISSN)
한국정보교육학회 (Korea Association of Information Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

자석 및 자기장 주제에 대한 과학 학습용 웹기반 시뮬레이션의 현황 및 개선 방안

Current State and Ways of Improvement of web-based science simulations about magnets and magnetic field

  • 이수아 (서울교육대학교 과학교육과) ;
  • 전영석 (서울교육대학교 과학교육과)
  • Lee, Sooah (Seoul National University of Education, Dept. of Science Education) ;
  • Jhun, Youngseok (Seoul National University of Education, Dept. of Science Education)
  • 투고 : 2017.03.14
  • 심사 : 2017.04.17
  • 발행 : 2017.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구를 통해 자석 및 자기장과 관련된 웹기반 과학학습 시뮬레이션들의 현황을 살펴보고, 시뮬레이션의 내용과 전략 및 디자인 측면에서 적절성을 평가하였다. 연구를 위해 과학학습 시뮬레이션 평가 기준을 고안하였으며, 초등교사 8명이 참여하여 자석 및 자기장 관련 시뮬레이션 14종을 평가 기준에 맞추어 평가하고 각 시뮬레이션의 특징을 기술하였다. 평가 결과를 바탕으로 시뮬레이션들을 상 그룹과 하 그룹으로 분류하였고, 상 그룹의 시뮬레이션에서 강점과, 하 그룹의 시뮬레이션에서 보완할 점들을 교수학습 내용, 교수학습 전략, 화면구성, 기술의 측면에 따라 분석하고 도출하였다. 연구 결과를 근거로 교수학습에 효과적인 자석 및 자기장 주제의 웹기반 시뮬레이션 개선을 위한 방안을 논의하였다.

This study is to review current state of web-based simulations for science learning about magnets and magnetic field, and evaluate the appropriateness of simulations in terms of contents, strategies and design. We designed a set of criteria for evaluating science simulations and applied it to 14 simulations about magnets and magnetic field. For the evaluation, eight elementary teachers participated and they described specific characteristics of each simulation according to the criteria. Based on the evaluation, we divided the simulations into two groups, excellent vs. normal groups. We analyzed strengths from the simulations in excellent group and weaknesses from the simulations in normal group according to the contents, learning strategies, screen format, and technical features. Implications for ways of improvement in developing web-based science simulations effective to science teaching and learning about magnets and magnetic field were discussed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Adams,W.K., Perkins,K.K .& Wieman,C.E. (2006). PhET look and feel. Retrieved November 23, 2006, from University of Colorado, Physics Education Technology Web site http://phet.colorado.edu /web-pages/publications/PhET Look and Feel.pdf.
  2. Adams, Reid, LeMaster, McKagan, Perkins, Dubson, & Wieman (2008). A Study of Educational Simulations Part 1 - Engagement and Learning. Jl. of Interactive Learning Research, 19-3, 397-419.
  3. Ahn Seong Hun (2002). Research of Evaluation Method According to Learning Type for Educational Web Contents, The Korea Contents Association, 2(3), 22-30.
  4. Akpan, J. P. (2001). Issues associated with inserting computer simulations into biology instruction: a review of the literature. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 5-3, Retrieved from: http://ejse.southwestern.edu/article/view- Article/7656/5423.
  5. Barton, R. (1996). Computers and practical work in science education. unpublished phD thesis, University of East Anglia.
  6. Bitter, G. G., & Wighton, D. (1987). The most important criteria used by the educational software evaluation consortium. The Computing Teacher, 14(6), 7-9.
  7. Blake, C., & Scanlon, E. (2007). Reconsidering simulations in science education at a distance: features of effective use. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(6), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00239.x
  8. Byon Sunye (2003). First-year high school students' representation patterns of magnetic field with magnetic field lines, Unpublished master's thesis. The Graduate School of Seoul National University.
  9. Cho Hee Hyung & Park Seung Jae (1994). Theory of science and science education, KyoyookBook.
  10. Choi Beom Gil & Jhun Young Seok (2016). Analysis of Abnormalities of Magnet Poles in an Elementary Science Classroom, New Physics, 66, 893-899.
  11. Do Kwang Seok (2000). An investigation on the conception of the magnetic field for the elementary students, Unpublished master's thesis. The Graduate School of Busan national University of education.
  12. Do Man Koo (2005). The effect of applying virtual lab using computer simulation to the unit of 'Force and Motion' in high school physics. Unpublished master's thesis. The Graduate School of Kyonggi University
  13. Duran, M. J., Gallardo, S., Toral, S. L., Martinez-Torres, R., & Barrero, F. J. (2007). A learning methodology using Matlab/Simulink for undergraduate electrical engineering courses attending to learner satisfaction outcomes. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(1), 55-73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-006-9007-z
  14. Gelbart, H., Brill, G., & Yarden, A. (2009). The impact of a web-based research simulation in bioinformatics on students’' understanding of genetics. Research in Science Education, 39(5), 725-751. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9101-1
  15. Jin Sun Hi & Jang Shin Ho (2007). Elementary School Teachers' Teaching Experience of Scientific Inquiry, Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(2), 181-191.
  16. Kim Gyung Wan(2008). Design and Development of Computer Simulation for Inquiry-Centered Laboratory Class. Unpublished master's thesis. The Graduate School of Korea National University of Education.
  17. Korea Education & Research Information Service(KERIS) (2005). Quality certification Index for education contents.
  18. Korea Multimedia Education Center(KMEC) (1998). Operating quality certification system for education softwares. PR 98-7.
  19. Lee Soo Ah, Jhun Young Seok, Hong Jun Euy, Shin Young Joon, Choi Junh Hoon & Lee In Ho (2007). Difficulties Experienced by Elementary School Teachers in Science Classes, Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 26(1), 97-107.
  20. Lee Ul Su (2007). Types of misconceptions about the magnetic field of the elementary and middle school students. Unpublished master's thesis. The Graduate School of Jinju University.
  21. Park Jong Wook & Kim Sun Ja (1996). The Survey of Problem Contexts Suffering by the Elementary Teachers in the Elementary Science Laboratory Instruction, Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 15(2), 263-282.
  22. The PhET Team (2006). PhET interactive computer simulations.[Computer software]. Boulder, CO: University of Colorado, Physics Education Technology Project. Retrieved May 19, 2008, from http://phet.colorado.edu
  23. van Berkum, J. J. A., & de Jong, T. (1991). Instructional environments for simulations. Education & Computing, 6, 305–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9287(91)80006-J
  24. Windschitl, M., & Andre, T. (1998). Using computer simulations to enhance conceptual change: the roles of constructivist instruction and student epistemological beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199802)35:2<145::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-S
  25. Zacharia, Z. C. (2007). Comparing and combining real and virtual experimentation: an effort to enhance students’' conceptual understanding of electric circuits. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 23(2), 120-132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x