DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

교류협력국 교원 초청 교육정보화 연수의 성과 분석

Analysis of ICT in Education Training for Teachers from Partner Countries

  • 서순식 (춘천교육대학교 컴퓨터교육과)
  • Suh, Soonshik (Dept. of Computer Education, Chuncheon National Univ. of Ed.)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.16
  • 심사 : 2017.04.16
  • 발행 : 2017.04.30

초록

각 시 도교육청은 "이러닝 세계화 사업"의 일환으로 교류협력국의 교원을 초청하여 교육정보화 연수를 진행하고 있다. 이 초청 연수의 목적은 이러닝 국가경쟁력 유지와 영향력 강화에 따른 국가 브랜드 제고, 우리의 선진교육정보화 사례를 공유하여 국가 간 지식정보 격차 해소, 교육정보화 분야 교류협력을 통한 동반자적 관계 구축, 교류협력국 선도 교원들이 자국의 교육정보화를 발전 및 확산할 수 있는 역량 강화 등이다. 2005년에 시작된 교류협력국의 교원 초청 교육정보화 연수가 10주년이 되는 시점을 맞이하여, 그간 진행된 연수 프로그램의 성과를 반추하고 지속적인 발전 방안을 모색할 필요가 있다. 이를 위해 상황, 투입, 과정, 산출에 따른 현황을 분석하기 위해 질적 연구를 수행하였다. 각 시 도교육청의 초청 연수 담당 장학사, 주무관, 그리고 해외 교원 등을 대상으로 심층면담을 실시하였고, 그 면담 결과를 주제별로 구분하여 분석하였다.

Each City & Provincial office of education has provided educational informatization training, which invites its partner country's teachers as part of 'e-Learning Globalization Project.' The purposes of this training program are, a) improving nation brand power by maintaining e-learning national competitiveness and strengthening influence, b) solving digital divide by sharing Korean best practices, c) establishing partnership through exchanges and cooperation, d) capacity building which support partner country's leading teachers can play key roles to spread educational informatization in their own country. It is necessary to reflect outcomes of training program until now and to find sustainable development plan, at 10th anniversary of Education ICT training program now. In order to fulfil purposes, qualitative research was conducted to analyze current status based on context, input, process, and product phases, and to find sustainable development alternative. In-depth interview(IDI) was conducted among supervisor, officials, and teachers from partner countries. Also, the result of IDI was analyzed by themes.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Brinkmann, S., & Kvale, S. (2014). InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing. (3rd ed.). CA: Sage Publications.
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. (3rd ed.). CA: Sage Publications.
  3. Glaser B. C., & Strauss A. L. (1999) The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine Transaction.
  4. Kim, Y. (2016). Qualitative research method. Seoul: Academy Press.
  5. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  6. MOE, & KEFA (2015). The second Workshop for competency builiding of teacher training experts of ICT in education for partner countries. KEFA-AT15-04.
  7. MOE, & KERIS (2014). White Paper on ICT in Education Korea. PM 2014-7.
  8. Seidman, I. (2012). Interviewing as Qualitative Research: A Guide for Researchers in Education and the Social Sciences(4th ed.). NY: Teacher College, Columbia University.
  9. Song, H., Suh, S., Jeong, H., Jang, S., & Yang, Y. (2013). Study on performance and improvement of partner country teacher training program. Seoul: Korea Education Frontier Association.
  10. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, A. J. (1985). Systematic evaluation: A self-instructional guide to theory and practice. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
  11. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. (2014). Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications (Research Methods for the Social Sciences) (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.