Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Research Autonomy's Factors on the Organizational Effectiveness : Focusing on Researcher of the Government-supported Research Institutes

연구자율성 구성요인에 따른 조직효과성 연구 : 공공연구기관 연구자를 중심으로

  • Kim, Jong-Gyu (Dept. of Public Administration, University of Seoul)
  • 김종규 (서울시립대학교 행정학)
  • Received : 2017.04.01
  • Accepted : 2017.05.20
  • Published : 2017.05.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to take a look at what are research autonomy's factors of the government-supported research institutes with a new angle and how these factors influence on organizational effectiveness at the same time. ultimately, this research will suggest what government should guarantee and support researcher of the government-supported research institutes. In the groundwork, this research divides the level of research autonomy individual and organizational level, and divides the type of research autonomy intrinsic and extrinsic autonomy and also organizational commitment, and measure job satisfaction for organizational effectiveness. consequently, intrinsic autonomy which is associated with 'selection of research project', 'freely and lively traffic in ideas', 'choice of research methodology', 'utilization of research's result' is much more important than extrinsic autonomy for researchers to improve organizational effectiveness.

본 연구의 목적은 공공연구기관 연구자의 연구자율성 구성요소를 새로운 관점에서 정의함과 동시에 그러한 구성요소들이 조직효과성에 미치는 영향을 살펴봄으로써, 궁극적으로 조직효과성 제고를 위해 공공연구기관 연구자에게 보장되어야 할 연구자율성 요소는 무엇인지를 확인하고 정책적인 지원 방안을 제시하는 데 있다. 이를 위한 기초 작업으로 연구자율성 수준을 구성 형태에 따라 개인 및 조직 수준으로, 연구자율성 유형을 본질적 및 비본질적 자율성으로 구분하였으며, 조직효과성에 미치는 영향을 알아보기 위해 조직몰입도와 직무만족도를 측정하였다. 연구 결과 본질적 자율성이 비본질적 자율성에 비해 조직효과성에 미치는 영향이 매우 높게 나타났다. 이는 연구자의 연구수행을 위한 간접적인 지원환경도 중요하지만 연구과제 선정, 자유로운 의견 교환, 연구방법론 선택, 연구결과 활용 등 연구 본연의 활동에 있어서 연구자들의 의사결정 및 재량권이 월등히 중요하다고 할 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ha, M. C., & Kim, Y.D., “Institutional Change of Governance Structure in Public Research Institutes,” Journal of Governmental Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp. 1-6, 2009.
  2. Kim, S. H., Cho, K. H., & Hong, S. M., “Organizational Management Strategies for Creative Research Performance in Research & Development Organizations,” Korean Policy Studies Review, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 135-167, 2001.
  3. National Research Council of Science & Technology, Research Institution Evaluation Manual, 2016.
  4. Naver, http://dic.naver.com (April 15, 2017)
  5. Daum, http://dic.daum.net (April 15, 2017)
  6. Son, K.W., "The Task on the establishment of a integrated conception of autonomy in the moral education," Journal of Korean Philosophical History, Vol. 26, pp. 273-304, 2009.
  7. Batey, M.V/, & Lewis, F. M., “Clarifying autonomy and accountability in nursing service: part I,,” Journal of Nursing Administration, Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 13-8, 1982.
  8. Morgeson, F. P., & Humphrey, S. E., “The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 6, pp. 1321-1339, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.6.1321
  9. Dworking, G., The Theory and Practice of Autonomy, Cambridge University Press [Especially!ch.8], 1988.
  10. Hackman, J. R. "The design of work teams," In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1987.
  11. National Research Council of Science & Technology, "A Benchmarking Study on Autonomous Operating System of Excellent Overseas Research Institutes," 2015.
  12. Allen, L. A., Management and Organization, Mc Graw Hill, 1958.
  13. Weber, M., Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. New York: Free Press, 1947.
  14. Barnard, C. I., Organization and Management: Selected papers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 1948.
  15. Min, J., “A Review of Conceptualizations and Re-conceptualizations of Organizational Effectiveness,” Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 83-104, 2003.
  16. Kim, K.S., & Lee, K. H., “Organizational Culture and Effectiveness of Executive Agency in Korea,” Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 39, No. 3, pp. 179-203, 2005.
  17. Lee, S. C., “A Study on the Relationship of Organizational Culture, Learning Organization, Organizational Effectiveness in the Public Institution,” Korean Public Administration Review, Vol. 46, No. 4, pp. 181-205, 2012.
  18. Hong, K. P., & Yoon, D. Y., “The Effect of Servant Leadership on Organizational Commitment,” Korean Journal of Business Administration, Vol. 26, No. 7, pp. 1825-1844, 2013.
  19. Kim, T. R., “Theoretical Relevance on the Concept of Social Capital,” Korean Governance Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, pp. 33-52, 2009. https://doi.org/10.17089/kgr.2009.16.3.002
  20. March, J. G., & Simon, H. A., Organizations. Wiley: New York, 1958.
  21. Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L., “An empirical assessment of organization commitment and organizational effectiveness,” Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 1-13, 1981. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392596
  22. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J., "A Three-component Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment". Human Resource Management Review, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 61-89, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
  23. Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J., Commitment in the Workplace. Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1997.
  24. Kim, J. B., “A Study on the Influence of Authentic Leadership in the Age of Convergence on the Organizational Effectiveness : Revolved around Effect of Tuned from Confidence of Superior,” Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 12, pp. 125-134, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.12.125
  25. McCormick, E. & Ilgen, D., Industrial psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1980.
  26. Noh, Y. S., “Factors Affecting on Organizational Commitment of Airline Flight of Crew in Convergency Society: Focus to Safety, Working Condition and Organizational Justice,” Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 55-64, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.4.055
  27. Yoon, K., & Lee, G., “The Effects of Integration on Employee Job Satisfaction and Alienation in the Wake of Public Organization Mergers,” Korean Society and Public Administration, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 233-262, 2012.
  28. Choi, B. W., “The Effects of Job Characteristics, Organizational Commitment on the Job Satisfaction in the Small-Medium Sized Firms,” The Korean Small Business Review, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 55-77, 2004.
  29. Shin, E. S., “Job Satisfaction and Relating Factors of Medical Record Technicians Working in General Hospitals,” Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 337-346, 2015. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2015.6.5.337
  30. Kim, J. B., “A Study on the Influence of Servant Readership on Organizational Effectiveness : Revolved around Effect of Tuned from Confidence of Superior,” Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 215-226, 2015. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2015.13.1.215
  31. Chowdhury, S. S., “The quest for autonomy,” Nursing Journal of India, Vol. 77, No. 9, pp. 241-3, 250, 1986.
  32. Lee, S, M., “The Causal Relationships among Nurses’ Perceived Autonomy, Job Satisfaction and Related Variables,” Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing Administration, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 109-122, 2000.
  33. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P., “The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization,” Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 63, No. 1, pp. 1-18, 1990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
  34. Smith, P. C., Kendall, L. M., & Hulin, C. L., The Measurement of Satisfaction in Work and Retirement. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1969.
  35. Weiss, D. J., Dawis, R. V., England, G.W., & Lofquist, L., Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1967.