DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analyses of Verbal Interaction among Students in Small Group Science Learning Using Smart Devices

스마트 기기를 활용한 소집단 과학 학습에서 학생의 언어적 상호작용 분석

  • Yun, Jeonghyun (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Sukjin (Department of Science Education, Jeonju National University of Education) ;
  • Ahn, Inyoung (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2017.01.05
  • Accepted : 2017.04.05
  • Published : 2017.06.20

Abstract

In this study, we analyzed verbal interactions in small group science learning using smart devices by the level of prior achievement. Four heterogeneous groups at a coed high school in Seoul participated. Verbal interactions during small group science learning were audio- and video-taped, transcribed, and analyzed. Verbal interactions were analyzed at the levels of a turn and an interaction unit. The results revealed that the frequencies of verbal interactions were high in task category, especially at information explanation, information question, and reflection on standards subcategories. Furthermore, the frequencies of high-level students at direction explanation, reflection on standards and progress subcategories were higher than those of low-level students, and the frequencies of low-level students at direction question and information explanation subcategories were higher than their counterpart. In the analyses of the interaction units, the frequencies in symmetric elaborated interaction were high, especially at cumulative and evaluative subcategories.

이 연구에서는 스마트 기기를 활용한 소집단 과학 학습 과정에서 사전 성취 수준에 따른 언어적 상호작용을 분석하였다. 서울시의 한 남녀 공학 고등학교에서 사전 성취 수준 측면에서 이질적으로 구성된 4개의 소집단이 참여하였다. 스마트 기기를 활용한 소집단 과학 학습 과정에서 일어나는 언어적 상호작용을 녹음 및 녹화하고 기록 원고를 작성한 뒤 분석하였다. 학생들 사이의 언어적 상호작용은 개별 진술과 상호작용 단위 수준에서 분석하였다. 연구 결과, 스마트 기기를 활용한 소집단 학습에서 학생 사이의 언어적 상호작용은 과제 관련 진술의 빈도가 높았는데, 특히 정보 설명, 정보 질문, 기준 반성의 빈도가 높았다. 방향 설명, 기준 반성, 진행에서는 사전 성취 수준 상위 학생들의 진술 빈도가 높게 나타났고, 방향 질문, 정보 설명에서는 하위 수준 학생들의 진술 빈도가 높게 나타났다. 상호작용 단위에서는 지식 구성 상호작용 중 대칭적 정교화 상호작용의 빈도가 높았는데, 특히 누적형과 평가형이 높게 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. Siemens, G. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2005, 2, 3.
  2. Ministry of Education. The 2015 Revised National Curriculum of Science; Seoul, 2015.
  3. Matthews, M. R. Journal of Science Education and Technology 2002, 11, 121. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1014661312550
  4. Kang, S. Concept Learning Strategy Emphasizing Social Consensus during Discussion: Instructional Effect and Verbal Interaction in Small Group Discussion. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, 2000.
  5. Lim, H.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2001, 21, 668.
  6. Cha, J.; Park, H.; Kim, K.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Chemical Society 2005, 49, 575. https://doi.org/10.5012/jkcs.2005.49.6.575
  7. Williams, A. J.; Pence, H. E. Journal of Chemical Education 2011, 88, 683. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed200029p
  8. Jarvela, S.; Naykki, P.; Laru, J.; Luokkanen, T. Educational Technology & Society 2007, 10, 71.
  9. Leem, J.; Kim, S. The Journal of Educational Information and Media 2013, 19, 1.
  10. Lin, Y.-T.; Chang, C.-H.; Hou, H.-T.; Wu, K.-C. Interactive Learning Environments 2015, 23, 1. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1005423
  11. Reilly, M.; Shen, H. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 2012, 78, 1185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcss.2011.10.008
  12. Walsh, E.; Cho, I. Journal of Laboratory Automation 2012, 20, 1.
  13. Vygotsky, L. S. Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes; Harvard University Press: Cambridge, 1978.
  14. Ko, Y.; Shin, W. The Korea Educational Review 2011, 17, 129.
  15. Yoo, K.-J.; Cho, H.-J.; Kim, E.; Yun, H. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education 2014, 19, 159.
  16. Kim, M.-K.; Lee, J.-S.; Yoo, K.-J. The Journal of Korea Open Association for Early Childhood Education 2016, 21, 263.
  17. Yun, J.; Kang, S.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2016, 36, 519. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2016.36.4.0519
  18. Lee, H.-Y.; Chang, S.-S.; Seong, S.-K.; Lee, S.-K.; Kang, S.-J.; Choi, B.-S. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2002, 22, 660.
  19. Kim, K. The Effects of Cooperative CAI and Reciprocal Peer Tutoring CAI in Chemistry Concept Learning: Conceptual Understanding and Verbal Interactions. Doctoral Dissertation, Seoul National University, Seoul, 2005.
  20. Laat, M.; Lally, V. Instructional Science 2003, 31, 7. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022596100142
  21. Lee, S. Journal of Educational Technology 2004, 20, 63. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.20.1.63
  22. Joo, Y.; Kim, K.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2014, 34, 221. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0221
  23. Renzi, S.; Klobas, J. Journal of Educational Technology & Society 2000, 3, 317.
  24. Rummel, N.; Spada, H. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2005, 14, 201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1402_2
  25. Kim, S. Journal of Educational Technology 2012, 28, 707. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.4.707
  26. Lim, K. Y. Journal of Korean Association of Computer Education 2012, 15, 65.