Journal of Korean Biological Nursing Science

Korean society of Biological Nursing Science (한국기초간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characteristics of Mixed Urinary Incontinence and Stress Urinary Incontinence: Relationship between Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms and Urodynamic Parameters

복합성 요실금과 복압성 요실금의 특성: 하부요로증상과 요역동학 검사결과의 관계

  • Lee, ji Yeon (Department of Nursing, Samsung Medical Center) ;
  • Song, Misoon (College of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University)
  • 이지연 (삼성서울병원 간호본부) ;
  • 송미순 (서울대학교 간호대학.간호과학 연구소)
  • Received : 2017.02.07
  • Accepted : 2017.03.02
  • Published : 2017.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the relationship between lower urinary tract symptoms and urodynamic parameters to investigate the characteristics of mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Methods: The subjects were 318 women with MUI and 128 women with SUI. Data were collected retrospectively from electronic medical records including Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms-Scored Form (BFLUTS-SF), Incontinence Quality of Life Instrument (I-QOL), voiding diaries, and urodynamic parameters. Results: Compared with the SUI group, the MUI group was older and showed lower I-QOL and more severe urinary tract symptoms. The MUI group had more urinary frequency, more nocturia, and a higher urgency score than the SUI group. In the correlation analysis, the greatest difference between the two groups was that urgency was associated with Qmax, maximal cystometric capacity, and detrusor overactivity only in the MUI group (r = -.175, p= .004; r = -.281, p< .001; r= .232, p< .001, respectively). Conclusion: As a result of this study, we propose that a customized management program that emphasizes the control of urgency for the MUI group, and one that effectively strengthens the weak pelvic floor for the SUI group.

Keywords

References

  1. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Roiser P, Ulmsten U, et al. The standardisation of terminology in lower urinary tract function: report from the standardisation sub-committee of the international continence society. Urology. 2003; 61(1):37-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(02)02243-4
  2. Hannestad YS, Rortveit G, Sandvik H, Hunskaar S. A community-based epidemiological survey of female urinary incontinence: the Norwegian EPINCONT study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2000;553(11):1150-1157. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00232-8
  3. Minassian VA, Drutz HP, Al-Badr A. Urinary incontinence as a worldwide problem. International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2003; 82(2):327-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00220-0
  4. Hunskaar S, Lose G, Sykes D, Voss S. The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women in four European countries. BJU International. 2004;93(3):324-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2003.04609.x
  5. Irwin DE, Milsom I, Hunskaar S, Reilly K, Kopp Z, Herschorn S, et al. Population-based survey of urinary incontinence, overactive bladder, and other lower urinary tract symptoms in five countries: results of the EPIC study. European Urology. 2006 ;50(6):1306-1314; discussion 1314-1315. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.eururo.2006.09.019
  6. Oh SJ, Park WH, Park CH, Paick JS, Seo JT, Lee YS, et al. Prevalence of urinary incontinence-related quality of life in Korean women: a population-based study. Journal of Korean Continence Society. 2003;7(2):73-80. https://dx.doi.org/10.5213/jkcs.2003.7.2.73
  7. Bump RC, Norton PA, Zinner NR, Yalchin I. Mixed urinary incontinence symptoms: Urodynamic findings, incontinence severity, and treatment response. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003;102(1):76-83. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/S0029-7844(03)00376-4
  8. Coyne KS, Zhou Z, Thompson C, & Versi E. The impact on health-related quality of life of stress, urge, and mixed urinary incontinence. BJU International. 2003;92(7):731-735. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1464-410X.2003.04463.x
  9. Gleason JL, Parden AM, Jauk V, Ballard A, Sung V, Richter HE. Outcomes of midurethral sling procedures in women with mixed urinary incontinence. International Urogynecology Journal. 2015;26(5):715-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00192-014-2580-x
  10. Winters JC, Dmochowski RR, Goldman HB, Herndon CD, Kobashi KC, Kraus SR, et al. Urodynamic studies in adults: AUA/SUFU Guideline. Journal of Urology. 2012;188(6):2464-2472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.09.081
  11. Thüroff JW, Abrams P, Andersson K, Artibani W, Chapple CR, Drake MJ, et al. EAU guidelines on urinary incontinence. European Urology. 2011;59(3):387-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2010.11.021
  12. Brookes ST, Donovan JL, Wright M, Jackson S, Abrams P. A scored form of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms questionnaire: data from a randomized controlled trial of surgery for women with stress incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2004;191(1):73-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.027
  13. Oh SJ, Park HG, Paick SH, Park WH, Choo MS. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of the Bristol Female Lower Urinary Tract Symptom Instrument. Journal of Korean Continence Society. 2004;8(2):89-113. https://dx.doi.org/10.5213/jkcs.2004.8.2.89
  14. Patrik DL, Martin ML, Bushnell DM, Yalcin I, Wagner TH, Buesching DP. Quality of life of women with urinary incontinence: further development of the incontinence quality of life instrument(I-QOL). Urology. 1999;53(1):71-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00454-3
  15. Oh SJ, Park HG, Lim SH, Hong SK, Martin ML, Ting BL, et al. Translation and linguistic validation of Korean version of the Incontinence Quality of Life(I-QoL) Instrument Journal of Korean Continence Society. 2002;6(2):10-23.https://dx.doi.org/10.5213/jkcs.2002.6.2.10
  16. Jeong SJ, Hwang IS, Kim SS, Lee ST, Min KE, Han BK, et al. Are risk factors for failure after mid-urethral sling operation different between patients with pure stress and those with mixed urinary incontinence in the short-term follow-up? Korean Journal of Urology. 2009;50(6):573-580. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2009.50.6.573
  17. Kim HM, O MM, Lee JG. Does the incidence of urgency symptoms increase along with the severity of stress urinary incontinence? Korean Journal of Urology. 2010;51(11):772-776. http://dx.doi.org/10.4111/kju.2010.51.11.772
  18. Kim OB, Y HS. Prevalence of urinary incontinence, single voided volume, post void residual volume, daytime frequency, and nocturia in women over 40 years. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 2013;25(6):679-689. http://dx.doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2012.24.6.679
  19. Monz B, Pons ME, Hampel C, Hunskaar S, Quail D, Samsioe G, Sykes E, et al. Patient-reported impact of urinary incontinence- Result from treatment seeking women in 14 European countries. Maturitas. 2005;52(2):24-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.maturitas.2005.09.005
  20. Duggan P. Urodynamics or history? Clinical decision-making in women presenting with urinary incontinence, Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2010; 50(6): 556-561. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01224.x
  21. Duggan P. Urodynamic diagnoses and quality of life in women presenting for evaluation of urinary incontinence. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology. 2011;51(5):416-420. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-828X.2011.01344.x
  22. Nyyssonen V, Talvensaari-Mattila A, Santala M. A prospective randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape versus transobturator tape in patients with stress or mixed urinary incontinence: subjective cure rate and satisfaction in median follow-up of 46 months. Scandinavian Journal of Urology. 2014:48(3): 309-315. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/21681805.2013.863802
  23. Nager CW, Schulz JA, Stanton SL, Monga A. Correlation of urethral closure pressure, leak-point pressure and incontinence severity measures. International Urogynecology Journal. 2001;12(6):395-400. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s001920170020
  24. Serels S. The wet patient: understanding patients with overactive bladder and incontinence. Current Medical Research and Opinion. 2004;20(6):791-801. http://dx.doi.org/10.1185/030079904125003593
  25. Nitti VW, Combs AJ. Correlation of Valsalva leak point pressure with subjective degree of stress urinary incontinence in women. Journal of Urology. 1996; 155(1):281-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(01)66619 -9
  26. Ku JH, Shin JW, Oh SJ, Kim SW, Paick JS. Clinical and urodynamic features according to subjective symptom severity in female urinary incontinence. Neurourology and Urodynamics. 2006;25(3):215-220. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/nau.20141
  27. Theofrastous JP, Bump RC, Elser DM, Wyman JF, McClish DK. Correlation of urodynamic measures of urethral resistance with clinical measures of incontinence severity in women with pure genuine stress incontinence. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 1995;173(2):407-414. https://doi.org/10. 1016/0002-9378(95)90260-0 https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(95)90260-0
  28. Albo M, Wruck L, Baker J, Brubaker L, Chai T, Dandreo KJ, et al. The relationships among measures of incontinence severity in women undergoing surgery for stress urinary incontinence. Journal of Urology. 2007;177(5):1810-1814. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2007.01.032
  29. Dmochowski R, Staskin D. Mixed incontinence: definitions, outcomes, and interventions. Current Opinion in Urology. 2005;15(6):374-379. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.mou.0000183946.96411.76