DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Research on Comparison and Analysis of UNESCO World Cultural Heritage Registration Criterion and Traditional Village's Evaluation Index System Identified in China

유네스코 세계문화유산 등재기준과 중국 전통마을 평가인증 지표체계 비교분석 연구

  • 유지홍 (계명대학교 대학원 건축학, 중국광서사범대학) ;
  • 이종국 (계명대학교 건축토목공학부 건축학전공)
  • Received : 2017.02.13
  • Accepted : 2017.05.04
  • Published : 2017.05.30

Abstract

By reference to the principles and criteria of UNESCO world cultural heritage for cultural heritage conservation. The traditional villages are important part of historical and cultural heritage, It's a truthful record of the traditional architectural style, outstanding architecture, traditional folk customs and the original spatial form. So the traditional villages are precious resources of our cultural heritage. However, due to the weakness of the census block and the deficiency of the resources and assessment, the legacy of the village is disappearing at an alarming rate, which is causes Chinese historical heritage in great loss, Currently, the evaluation and protection of traditional villages have drawn great attention to the relevant departments, National housing and construction office sued a traditional village's evaluation index system in 2012 and launched a nationwide evaluation of the traditional villages. So objective evaluation of ancient village's comprehensive value is the basis of correctly protecting and utilizing ancient villages. The research on comparison and analysis of UNESCO world cultural heritage registration criterion and traditional village's evaluation index system identified in China is a beneficial exploration on quantitative evaluation for UNESCO world cultural heritage.

Keywords

References

  1. Zhu, G., Fang, Q. & Lei, X.(1998). An Exploration of Architectural Heritage Evaluation, New Architecture, 2, 22-24.
  2. Cha, Q. (2000). Availability of Architectural Heritage Evaluation, Architectural Journal, 4, 48-51.
  3. Lai, M., Wang, X. & Luo, A. (2006). Appraising Method of Comprehensive Value of Historic Buildings Based on Orthogonal Design, Urban Science Edition, 23(1), 35-38.
  4. Zhu, X. (2001). Evaluation Criteria on the Ancient Villages, Traditional Chinese Architecture and Gardens, 4, 53-56.
  5. Wang, Q. & Li, F. (2006). On the Quantitative Evaluati on Method of Ancient Village's Comprehensive Value and Demonstration Study, Tourism Tribune, 21(1), 19-24.
  6. Liang, S. (2013). The study of Traditional villages evaluation index system identified-taking Central Yunnan as an example, Faculty of Architecture and City Planning, Kunming University of Science & Technology, China, Ph. D. Dissertation.
  7. Zhao, Y., Zhang, J. & Lu, S. (2006). The Study on Conservation Evaluation System and Method on the Historic Cultural Towns & Villages-A Case Study of The First Group Famous Historic and Cultural towns & villages in China, Scientia Geographica Sinica, 26(4), 497-504.
  8. Historic townships (Villages) Evaluation Index System(2004), National Housing and Construction Office in China, 12.
  9. Traditional Villages Evaluation Index System(2012), National Housing and Construction Office in China, 34.
  10. Convention concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage(1972), UNESCO.
  11. Lee, J. (2008). The Method of Conservation for the Traditional Korean Settlements-Base on the Case Study in Korea and China, Architecture Graduate School Han Nam University, Ph. D. Dissertation.
  12. Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China, Ministry of Culture and State Administration of Culture Heritage(2012), Traditional Villages Evaluation Index System Identified(Trial), 125.
  13. Yeom, D. & Lee, K. (2016). Study on the Assessment Indicators for the Sustainability Improvement of G-SEED, Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design, 9(335), 49-56.
  14. Kim, H. (2014). The Study of Indicator Development for the Sustainable Tourism of Korean World Cultural Heritage, Department of Tourism Management, Graduate School of Paichai University, Korea, Ph. D. Dissertation.