Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Do Personality and Organizational Politics Predict Workplace Victimization? A Study among Ghanaian Employees

  • Amponsah-Tawiah, Kwesi (Department of Organization and Human Resource Management, University of Ghana Business School) ;
  • Annor, Francis (Department of Psychology, University of Ghana)
  • Received : 2015.11.07
  • Accepted : 2016.08.10
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Background: Workplace victimization is considered a major social stressor with significant implications for the wellbeing of employees and organizations. The aim of this study was to examine the influences of employees' personality traits and organizational politics on workplace victimization among Ghanaian employees. Methods: Using a cross-sectional design, data were collected from 631 employees selected from diverse occupations through convenience sampling. Data collection tools were standardized questionnaires that measured experiences of negative acts at work (victimization), the Big Five personality traits, and organizational politics. Results: The results from hierarchical multiple regression analysis showed that among the personality traits neuroticism and conscientiousness had significant, albeit weak relationships with victimization. Organizational politics had a significant positive relationship with workplace victimization beyond employees' personality. Conclusion: The study demonstrates that compared with personal characteristics such as personality traits, work environment factors such as organizational politics have a stronger influence on the occurrence of workplace victimization.

Keywords

References

  1. Aquino K, Thau S. Workplace victimization: aggression from the target's perspective. Annu Rev Psychol 2009;60:717-41. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163703
  2. Keashly L. Emotional abuse in the workplace: conceptual and empirical issues. J Emot Abuse 1997;1:85-117. https://doi.org/10.1300/J135v01n01_05
  3. Tepper BJ. Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad Manage J 2000;43:178-90.
  4. Spector PE, Jex SM. Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: interpersonal conflict at work scale, organizational constraints scale, quantitative workload inventory, and physical symptoms inventory. J Occup Health Psychol 1998;3:356. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.3.4.356
  5. Blau G, Andersson L. Testing a measure of instigated workplace incivility. J Occup Organ Psychol 2005;78:595-614. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317905X26822
  6. Ashforth B. Petty tyranny in organizations. Hum Relat 1994;47:755-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700701
  7. Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Pagon M. Social undermining in the workplace. Acad Manage J 2002;45:331-51.
  8. Harvey MG, Heames JT, Richey RG, Leonard N. Bullying: From the playground to the boardroom. J Leadersh Organ Stud 2006;12:1-11.
  9. Bowling NA, Beehr TA, Bennett MM, Watson CP. Target personality and workplace victimization: a prospective analysis. Work Stress 2010;24:140-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2010.489635
  10. Bollmer JM, Harris MJ, Milich R. Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: narratives, physiological arousal, and personality. J Res Personal 2006;40:803-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.003
  11. Zapf D, Einarsen S. Bullying in the workplace: recent trends in research and practice-An introduction. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2001;10:369-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594320143000807
  12. Hoel H, Sheehan MJ, Cooper CL, Einarsen S. Organizational effects of workplace bullying. In: Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL, editors. Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2011. p. 129-47.
  13. Nielsen MB, Einarsen S. Outcomes of exposure to workplace bullying: a metaanalytic review. Work Stress 2012;26:309-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.734709
  14. Trepanier S-G, Fernet C, Austin S. A longitudinal investigation of workplace bullying, basic need satisfaction, and employee functioning. J Occup Health Psychol 2015;20:105. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037726
  15. Cavanaugh C, Campbell J, Messing JT. A longitudinal study of the impact of cumulative violence victimization on comorbid posttraumatic stress and depression among female nurses and nursing personnel. Workplace Health Saf 2014;62:224-32. https://doi.org/10.1177/216507991406200602
  16. Khan A, Khan R. Understanding and managing workplace bullying. Ind Commerc Train 2012;44:85-9. https://doi.org/10.1108/00197851211202911
  17. Balducci C, Cecchin M, Fraccaroli F. The impact of role stressors on workplace bullying in both victims and perpetrators, controlling for personal vulnerability factors: a longitudinal analysis. Work Stress 2012;26:195-212. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2012.714543
  18. Agervold M, Mikkelsen EG. Relationships between bullying, psychosocial work environment and individual stress reactions. Work Stress 2004;18:336-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370412331319794
  19. Bowling NA, Beehr TA. Workplace harassment from the victim's perspective: a theoretical model and meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol 2006;91:998. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.5.998
  20. Drory A. Perceived political climate and job attitudes. Organ Stud 1993;14:59-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/017084069301400105
  21. Salin D. Bullying and organizational politics in competitive and rapidly changing work environments. Int J Manag Decis Making 2003;4:35-46. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMDM.2003.002487
  22. Ferris P. A preliminary typology of organizational response to allegations of workplace bullying: see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil. Br J Guid Couns 2004;32:389-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069880410001723576
  23. Vartia M. The sources of bullying-psychological work environment and organizational climate. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 1996;5:203-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414855
  24. Skogstad A, Einarsen S, Torsheim T, Aasland MS, Hetland H. The destructiveness of laissez-faire leadership behavior. J Occup Health Psychol 2007;12:80. https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8998.12.1.80
  25. Johan Hauge L, Skogstad A, Einarsen S. Relationships between stressful work environments and bullying: results of a large representative study. Work Stress 2007;21:220-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370701705810
  26. Braithwaite V, Ahmed E, Braithwaite J. Workplace bullying and victimization: the influence of organizational context, shame and pride. Int J Organ Behav 2008;13:71-94.
  27. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Zapf D, Cooper CL. The concept of bullying and harassment at work: The European tradition. In: Bullying and harassment in the workplace: developments in theory, research, and practice. 2nd ed. London (UK): Taylor & Francis; 2011. p. 3-39.
  28. Coyne I, Seigne E, Randall P. Predicting workplace victim status from personality. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 2000;9:335-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943200417957
  29. Matthiesen SB, Einarsen S. Perpetrators and targets of bullying at work: role stress and individual differences. Violence Vict 2007;22:735-53. https://doi.org/10.1891/088667007782793174
  30. Zapf D. Organizational, work group related and personal causes of mobbing/bullying at work. Int J Manpow 1999;20:70-85. https://doi.org/10.1108/01437729910268669
  31. Glaso L,Matthiesen SB, NielsenMB, Einarsen S. Do targets of workplace bullying portray a general victim personality profile? Scand J Psychol 2007;48:313-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2007.00554.x
  32. Balducci C, Fraccaroli F, Schaufeli WB. Workplace bullying and its relation with work characteristics, personality, and post-traumatic stress symptoms: an integrated model. Anxiety Stress Coping 2011;24:499-513. https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2011.555533
  33. Rammstedt B, John OP. Measuring personality in one minute or less: a 10-item short version of the Big Five Inventory in English and German. J Res Personal 2007;41:203-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.02.001
  34. Nye LG, Witt LA. Dimensionality and construct validity of the Perceptions of Organizational Politics Scale (Pops). Educ Psychol Meas 1993;53:821-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003026
  35. Einarsen S, Hoel H, Notelaers G. Measuring exposure to bullying and harassment at work: Validity, factor structure and psychometric properties of the Negative Acts Questionnaire-Revised. Work Stress 2009;23:24-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370902815673
  36. McCrae RR, John OP. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. J Pers 1992;60:175-215. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00970.x
  37. Hawker DS, Boulton MJ. Twenty years' research on peer victimization and psychosocial maladjustment: a meta-analytic review of cross-sectional studies. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2000;41:441-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-7610.00629
  38. Kim E, Glomb TM. Victimization of high performers: the roles of envy and work group identification. J Appl Psychol 2014;99:619. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035789
  39. Leymann H. The content and development of mobbing at work. Eur J Work Organ Psychol 1996;5:165-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414853
  40. Zaykowski H, Gunter WD. Gender differences in victimization risk: exploring the role of deviant lifestyles. Violence Vict 2013;28:341-56. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-12-00019

Cited by

  1. Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review vol.16, pp.11, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111945
  2. Future of Victimized Employees: A Model Based on Long-Run Cascading Effects of Experienced Victimization vol.40, pp.7, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2018.1442655
  3. Relationship Between Workplace Bullying and Employees’ Subjective Well-Being: Does Resilience Make a Difference? vol.32, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672-020-09348-w
  4. Cognitive hardiness as a moderator in the relationship between generalized workplace harassment and anger among working women in Pakistan vol.30, pp.8, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/10911359.2020.1781016