Safety and Health at Work

Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency (산업안전보건연구원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Review of Mercury Exposure and Health of Dental Personnel

  • Nagpal, Natasha (Oxford Brookes University, School of Psychology, Social Work and Public Health) ;
  • Bettiol, Silvana S. (School of Medicine, University of Tasmania) ;
  • Isham, Amy (University Department of Rural Health, University of Tasmania) ;
  • Hoang, Ha (University Department of Rural Health, University of Tasmania) ;
  • Crocombe, Leonard A. (University Department of Rural Health, University of Tasmania)
  • Received : 2016.02.24
  • Accepted : 2016.05.30
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Considerable effort has been made to address the issue of occupational health and environmental exposure to mercury. This review reports on the current literature of mercury exposure and health impacts on dental personnel. Citations were searched using four comprehensive electronic databases for articles published between 2002 and 2015. All original articles that evaluated an association between the use of dental amalgam and occupational mercury exposure in dental personnel were included. Fifteen publications from nine different countries met the selection criteria. The design and quality of the studies showed significant variation, particularly in the choice of biomarkers as an indicator of mercury exposure. In several countries, dental personnel had higher mercury levels in biological fluids and tissues than in control groups; some work practices increased mercury exposure but the exposure levels remained below recommended guidelines. Dental personnel reported more health conditions, often involving the central nervous system, than the control groups. Clinical symptoms reported by dental professionals may be associated with low-level, long-term exposure to occupational mercury, but may also be due to the effects of aging, occupational overuse, and stress. It is important that dental personnel, researchers, and educators continue to encourage and monitor good work practices by dental professionals.

Keywords

References

  1. American Dental Association. Dental Amalgam:Update on safety concerns [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Feb 12]. Available from:http://www.ada.org/-/media/ADA/Member%20Center/FIles/safety.pdf.
  2. World Health Organization. Future use of material for dental restorations [Internet]. 2012a [cited 2015 Feb 12]. Available from:http://www.who.int/oral_health/publications/dental_material_2011.pdf.
  3. World Health Organization. Exposure to mercury:A major public health concern [Internet]. 2012b [cited 2014 Mar 1]. Available from:http://www.who.int/phe/news/Mercury-flyer.pdf.
  4. Bjorklund G. Mercury in the dental office. Risk evaluation of the occupational environment in dental care. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 1991;111:948-51 [in Norwegian].
  5. Ngim CH, Foo SC, Boey KW, Jeyaratnam J. Chronic neurobehavioral effects of elemental mercury in dentists. Br J Ind Med 1992;49:782-90.
  6. Echeverria D, Heyer NJ, Martin MD, Naleway CA, Woods JS, Bittner AC. Behavioural effects of low levels exposure to Hg0 among dentists. Neurotoxicol Teratol 1995;17:161-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0892-0362(94)00049-J
  7. Rowland AS, Baird DD, Weinberg CR, Shore DL, Shy CM, Wilcox AJ. The effect of occupational exposure to mercury vapour on the fertility of female dental assistants. Occup Environ Med 1994;51:28-34. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.51.1.28
  8. United Nations Environmental Program "INC7". Minamata Convention on Mercury [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 1] Available from:http://www.mercuryconvention.org/Countries/tabid/3428/Default.aspx.
  9. FDI Policy Statement. Mercury Hygiene Guidance [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2015 Oct 1]. Available from:http://www.fdiworldental.org/media/11271/Mercuryhygiene-guidance-2007.pdf.
  10. National Health Federation. Press release:NORWAY-Minister of the Environment and International Development Erik Solheim:Bans Mercury in Products [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Oct 1]. Available from:https://www.thenhf.com/norway-minister-of-the-environment-and-internationaldevelopment-erik-solheim-bans-mercury-in-products/.
  11. The Swedish Government Chemicals Policy. Sweden will ban the use of mercury on 1 June 2009 [Internet]. [cited 2014 Mar 1]. Available from:http://www.government.se/contentassets/12c4d85c2ca64d05827fc131f1a47ab9/sweden-will-ban-the-use-of-mercury.
  12. Food and Drug Administration. Banning mercury amalgam [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2015 Oct 1]. Available from:http://www.fda.gov/downloads/.../medicaldevices/.../ucm236379.pdf.
  13. Law M, Stewart D, Pollock N, Letts L, Bosch J, Westmorland M. Critical Review Form - Quantitative Studies [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2015 Nov 1]. Available from:https://www.unisa.edu.au/Global/Health/Sansom/Documents/iCAHE/CATs/McMasters_Quantitative%20review.pdf.
  14. Ritchie KA, Gilmour WH, Macdonald EB, Burke FJT, McGowan DA, Dale I, Hammersley R, Hamilton R, Binnie V, Collington D. Health and neuropsychological functioning of dentists exposed to mercury. Occup Environ Med 2002;59:287-93. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.59.5.287
  15. Aydin N, Karaoglanoglu S, Yigit A, Keles SM, Kirpinar I, Seven N. Neuropsychological effects of low mercury exposure in dental staff in Erzurum, Turkey. Int Dent J 2003;53:85-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1875-595X.2003.tb00664.x
  16. Joshi A, Douglass CW, Kim HD, Joshipura KJ, Park MC, Rimm EB, Carino MJ, Garcia RI, Morris JS, Willett WC. The relationship between amalgam restorations and mercury levels in male dentists and non dental health professionals. J Public Health Dent 2003;63:52-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2003.tb03474.x
  17. Karahalil B, Rahravi H, Ertas N. Examination of urinary mercury levels in dentists in Turkey. Hum Exp Toxicol 2005;24:383-8. https://doi.org/10.1191/0960327105ht541oa
  18. Hilt B, Svendson K, Syverson T, Aas O, Qvenild T, Sletvold H, Melo I. Occurrence of cognitive symptoms in dental assistants with previous occupational exposure to metallic mercury. Neurotoxicology 2009;30:1202-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2009.04.012
  19. Kasraei S, Mortazavi H, Vahedi M, Vaziri PB, Assar MJ. Blood mercury levels and its determinants among dental practitioners in Hamadan, Iran. J Dent 2010;7:55-62.
  20. Svendsen K, Syversen T, Melo I, Hilt B. Historical exposure to mercury among Norwegian dental personnel. Scand J Work Environ Health 2010;36:231-41. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.2878
  21. Samir AM, Aref WM. Impact of occupational exposure to elemental mercury on some antioxidative enzymes among dental staff. Toxicol Ind Health 2011;27:779-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233710397420
  22. Neghab M, Choobineh A, Hassan Zadeh J, Ghaderi E. Symptoms of intoxication in dentists associated with exposure to low levels of mercury. Ind Health 2011;49:249-54. https://doi.org/10.2486/indhealth.MS1214
  23. Hilt B, Svendson K, Syverson T, Aas O, Qvenild T. Occurrence of cognitive and neurological symptoms in Norwegian dentists. Saf Health Work 2011;2:176-82. https://doi.org/10.5491/SHAW.2011.2.2.176
  24. Yilmaz H, Tutkun E, Demiralp KO, Yilmaz FM, Aliyev V, Soylemezoglu T. Exposure to mercury among dental health workers in Turkey:Correlation with amalgam work and own fillings. Toxicol Ind Health 2013:1-4.
  25. ACGIH. TLVs and BEIs. Threshold limit values for chemical substances and physical agents and biological exposure indices. Cincinnati (OH):American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists; 2003. Report No.:ISBN 1-882417-49-6.
  26. Sletvold H, Svendsen K, Aas O, Syverson T, Hilt B. Neuropsychological function and past exposure to metallic mercury in female dental workers. Scand J Psychol 2012;53:136-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2011.00929.x
  27. Moen BE, Hollund BE, Riise T. Neurological symptoms among dental assistants: a cross sectional study. J Occup Med Toxicol 2008;18:3.
  28. Thygesen LC, Flaschs EM, Hanehoj K, Kjuus H, Juel K. Hospital admissions for neurological among dentists and dental assistants occupationally exposed to mercury. J Occup Environ Med 2011;68:895-901. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2010.064063
  29. Jones L, Bunnell J, Stillman J. A 30-year follow up of residual effects on New Zealand School Dental Nurses, from occupational mercury exposure. Hum Exp Toxicol 2007;26:367-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0960327107076824
  30. Lynch CD, Shortall AC, Stewardson D, Tomson PL, Burke FJ. Teaching posterior composite resin restorations in the United Kingdom and Ireland:Consensus views of teachers. Br Dent J 2007;203:183-7. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2007.726
  31. American Dental Association. Statement on Dental Amalgam:American Dental Association [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2016 Oct 05]. Available from:http://www.ada.org/en/about-the-ada/ada-positions-policies-and-statements/statement-on-dental-amalgam.
  32. Canadian Dental Association. Position on Dental Amalgam [Internet]. 2005 [cited 2016 May 15]. Available from:https://www.cda-adc.ca/_files/position_statements/amalgam.pdf.
  33. Australian Dental Association (ADA) Policy Statement 5.15 on Amalgam Waste Management - Best Practice Guide [Internet]. 2007 [cited 2016 May 15]. Available from:http://155.187.2.69/wastepolicy/consultation/submissions/pubs/134-attachmenta.pdf.
  34. Consensus statement of the German Federal Ministry of Health, the German Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM), the German Dental Association (BZAK), the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Dentists (KZBV), the German Society for Dental and Oral Medicine (DGZMK), the German Society for Operative Dentistry and the German Association of dentists practicing naturopathy. Consensus statement on restorative materials in dentistry [Internet]. 1997 [cited 2016 May 15]. Available from:http://www.agz-rnk.de/agz/download/3/broschuere_amalgame.pdf.
  35. Dye BA, Schober SE, Dillon CF, Jones RL, Fryar C, McDowell M, Sinks TH. Urinary mercury concentrations associated with dental restorations in adult women aged 16-49 years:United States, 1999-2000. Occup Environ Med 2005;62:368-75. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2004.016832
  36. Mahaffey KR. Mercury exposure:medical and public health issues. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2005;116:127-54.
  37. Mordukhovich I, Wright RO, Hu H, Amarasirlwardena C, Baccarelli A, Litonjua A, Sparrow D, Vokonas P, Schwartz J. Associations of toenail arsenic, cadmium, mercury, manganese, and lead with blood pressure in the normative aging study. Environ Health Perspect 2012;20:98-104.
  38. Nutall KL. Interpreting hair mercury levels in individual patients. Ann Clin Lab Sci 2006;36:248-61.

Cited by

  1. Emerging Ethical Issues in Restorative Dentistry vol.23, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2017.1385918
  2. Usefulness of Human Biomonitoring for the Process of Risk Assessment of Exposure to Xenobiotics Including Dietary Intake Using as an Example the Exposure to Mercury vol.62, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.21101/hygiena.a1566
  3. A Systematic Review of Amalgam Bonded Restorations: In vitro and Clinical Findings vol.19, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2374
  4. Neurotoxic effects of mercury exposure in dental personnel vol.124, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/bcpt.13199
  5. Mercury vapor volatilization from particulate generated from dental amalgam removal with a high-speed dental drill - a significant source of exposure vol.14, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-019-0240-2
  6. Sources, toxicity, and remediation of mercury: an essence review vol.191, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7743-2
  7. The effect of 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging on microleakage of amalgam restorations vol.82, pp.11, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/jemt.23355
  8. Evaluation of kidney function and oxidative stress biomarkers in prolonged occupational exposure with mercury in dentists vol.19, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genrep.2020.100627
  9. Safe use of chemicals and risk communication among dentists and dental students in Greece vol.36, pp.6, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1177/0748233720933062
  10. Neuropsychological effects of long-term occupational exposure to mercury among chloralkali workers vol.66, pp.3, 2020, https://doi.org/10.3233/wor-203194
  11. Mercury in Dental Amalgam, Online Retail, and the Minamata Convention on Mercury vol.54, pp.22, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.0c01248
  12. Mercury level in biological samples of dentists in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis vol.18, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00558-w
  13. The management of mercury from dental amalgam in wastewater effluent vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2021.1960642
  14. Sustainable oral healthcare and the environment: challenges vol.48, pp.6, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12968/denu.2021.48.6.493
  15. Mercury and Prenatal Growth: A Systematic Review vol.18, pp.13, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137140