Industry Promotion Research (산업진흥연구)

Industrial Promotion Institute (산업진흥원)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Britain will go after the European Union

英国脱欧后欧盟将向何处去

  • yushu, Zhou (Inner Mongolia Normal University Hongde College) ;
  • Wyrwoll, Thomas W. (UNESCO International Petroleum Commission)
  • 주옥수 (내몽고사범대학홍덕학원) ;
  • Received : 2017.01.10
  • Accepted : 2017.01.17
  • Published : 2017.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This paper focuses on the development prospects of the UK after Europe, the development situation of the EU and the world's democratic issues were discussed. Professor Zhou Yushu that the old EU pattern may no longer be suitable for contemporary development trends, the need for reform and create a new pattern of mutual benefit and win-win situation. Professor Thomas believes that the impact of Britain's departure from Europe should be viewed from a dialectical perspective, and the benefits and disadvantages of China's economic development plan will be positive for the economic development of Europe as a whole. With the common development of China.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbar, Yusaf H., The Multinational Enterprise, EU Enlargement and Central Europe, Oxford: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
  2. Allison, Graham T., Essence of Decision: Explaining the Alter, Karen J., Establishing the Supremacy of European Law: The Making of an International Rule of Law in Europe, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  3. Bulmer, Simon J., British Devolution and European Policy-making: Transforming Britain into Multi-level Governance, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.
  4. Campanella, Miriam L., EU Economic Governance and Globalization, Aldershot: Edward Elgar, 2003, pp. 1-30.
  5. Caporaso, James A, The European Union Dilemmas of Regional Integration Boulder, Westview Press, 2000.
  6. De Burca, Grainne, The Constitutional Limits of EU Action, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
  7. Elsig, Manfred., The EU's Common Commercial Policy: Institutions, Interests, and Ideas, Ashgate, 2002. Farrell, Mary et al., European Integration in the 21st Century, London: SAGE, 2002.
  8. Frohlich, Stefan, Difficulties of EU Governance, Peter Lang Inc, 2004.
  9. Greenwood, Justin, Interest Representation in the European Union, London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.
  10. Guarnieri, Carlo, et al., The Power of Judges: A Comparative Study of Court and Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 160-181.
  11. Guibernau, Montserrat (ed.), Governing European Diversity, London: SAGE, 2001.
  12. Halberstam, Daniel, The Bridge of Messina or European Democracy and the Limits ofLiberal Intergovernmentalism, Michigan: University of Michigan Press, 2004.
  13. Hall, Ronald, and Smith, Alasdair, Competitiveness and Cohesion in EU Policies, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
  14. Nature Physics(2014), "British science needs free movement", 10(12), 891-891. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3195
  15. Abbott, A. et al.(2016), "Boon or burden: what has the EU ever done for science?", Nature 534(7607), pp.307-309. https://doi.org/10.1038/534307a
  16. Cressey, D.(2016a), "Academics across Europe join 'Brexit' debate", Nature, 530(7588), pp. 15. https://doi.org/10.1038/530015a
  17. Cressey, D.(2016b), "Scientists say 'no' to UK exit from Europe in Nature poll", Nature, 531(7596), pp. 559. https://doi.org/10.1038/531559a
  18. Feildenk, T.(2016. June 13), "Would Brexit compromise the future of UK science?", BBC News. Retrieved from http://www.bbc.com.
  19. Hook, D. and Szomszor, M. (2016), "Examining implications of Brexit for the UK research base: An analysis of the UK's competitive research funding", Digital Science.
  20. Knapton S.(2016. June 10), "13 Nobel laureates urge Britain to stay in European Union", The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk.