한국통신학회논문지 (The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences)

  • 제42권4호
  • /
  • Pages.806-815
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1226-4717(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-3880(eISSN)
한국통신학회 (The Korean Institute of Commucations and Information Sciences)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국방 지휘·통제 시설을 위한 ICAN, I3A 설계기준

ICAN, I3A Design Criteria for Military Defense Command & Control Facilities

  • Jo, Yun-Jeong (Ajou University Department of Information and communication technology)
  • 투고 : 2016.09.26
  • 심사 : 2017.04.17
  • 발행 : 2017.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

한국군은 국방시설기준이 정립되어 있으나 대부분 시설위주의 설계기준에 중점을 두고 작성되어 있다. 특히 정보통신분야에서는 세부적인 기준은 제시하지 않고 대략적인 수준으로만 제시되어 있다. 미군의 경우 1990년부터 각 군이 공통적으로 적용 가능한 시설기준에 대하여 통합시설기준서(UFC : Unified Facilities Criteria)를 완성해 모든 사업에 공통적용 할 수 있도록 설계기준을 제시하고 있다. 특히 정보통신분야에서는 시설분야와 연계해서 건물내부체계는 미군의 기지통신 기반구조설계기준(I3A: Installation, Information, Infrastructure Architecture)과 시스템에 대해서는 기지 및 캠퍼스지역 네트워크설계기준(ICAN : Installation and Campus area Network)과 비교를 통해 우리군의 지휘 통제시설 및 일반/행정시설에 대한 바람직한 설계기준선을 제시한다.

Korean Ministry of National Defense has criteria for military facilities but most were made with the focus on design criteria of facilities and especially in the case of information and communication, only overall criteria with the level of conceptual design are suggested without details. By comparing the design standards of ICAN and I3A that are applied in US Department of Defense, this study will suggest the desirable design standard of Korean military on command/control facilities and general/administrative facilities.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. MND, Defense interoperability management instruction revision specialist, pp. 1-138, May 2016.
  2. H. J. Ahn, T. G. Lee, and B. I. Cho, "A study on agility-based event model of complex area," J. IT&A, vol. 12. no. 3, pp. 57-374, 2015.
  3. Y. D. Kim, "The defense I3A framework for Net-Centric based command & control facilities," M. S. Thesis, Dept. of NCW, Graduate School of Ajou University, pp. 1-51, 2015.
  4. DODI Cyber-Security 8510.01, Risk Management Framework(RMF) for DoD Information Technology, pp. 1-38, Mar. 2014.
  5. Standards & Specification for DISN_EN (Defense Information System Network Enterprise Network), Installation Campus Area Network Design & Implementation, Army Architecture Integration Center CIO/G6, pp. 1-42, p. A5, May 2014.
  6. MND, Defense.military facility standard information communication equipment, pp. 1-123, Jul. 2013.
  7. MND, Defense.Criteria for Military Facilities Protective Criteria for Major Military Facilities, 3-40-10, pp. 1-5, Jul. 2013.
  8. U.S Army Installation and Campus Area Network Design Guide, Dept. of The Army United States Army Inf. Syst. Eng. Command Fort Huachuca, Arizona 85613-5300, pp. 1-15, 2013.
  9. DoD UCR 2013 Section 2, 2.25.4 UC Framework 2013 Combined, Section 7, pp. 2-285, 2013
  10. Implementation Engineering Subject Matter Expert, Technical criteria for the installation information infrastructure architecture(I3A), US Army Inf. Syst. Eng. Command(USAISEC), pp. 1-78, 2013.
  11. Defense.Military Facilities Standards and Guidelines.Update Study, MND, pp. 1-12, pp. 204-229, Mar. 2012.
  12. DoD DISA, HEMP(High-Altitude Electro-Magnetic Pulse) Protection Standard for Ground-based C4I Facilities, MIL STD-188-125-1, pp. 11-97, Apr. 2005.
  13. S. G. Lee, "A study on the construction of EDI message security system" M. S. Thesis, Ajou University, pp. 1-39, 2000.
  14. H. Kim, "C4I system summary" M. S. Thesis, Ajou University, 2016.
  15. J. H. Lee and T. G. Lee, "Capacity-oriented EA framework for enterprise-wide reform," Commun. Soc. Inf. Soc. Policy, vol. 15, no.1, pp. 96-117, 2008.