대한치과교정학회지 (The korean journal of orthodontics)

  • 제47권3호
  • /
  • Pages.186-194
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2234-7518(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2005-372X(eISSN)
대한치과교정학회 (The Korean Association Of Orthodontists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of skeletal divergence on oral health-related quality of life and self-reported jaw function

  • Antoun, Joseph Safwat (Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago) ;
  • Thomson, William Murray (Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago) ;
  • Merriman, Tony Raymond (Department of Biochemistry, School of Medical Sciences, University of Otago) ;
  • Rongo, Roberto (Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Oral Science, University of Naples "Federico II") ;
  • Farella, Mauro (Department of Oral Sciences, Sir John Walsh Research Institute, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Otago)
  • 투고 : 2016.07.14
  • 심사 : 2016.10.17
  • 발행 : 2017.05.25
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objective: To investigate the differences in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and self-reported jaw function between patients with hyperdivergent and normodivergent facial types. Methods: Eighty patients with a distinctively hyperdivergent facial type (mandibular plane angle greater than 2 standard deviations, or $42^{\circ}$) and 80 controls were individually matched according to age, sex, ethnicity, and treatment stage. Data were collected using self-report questionnaires such as the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14) and Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-8). Results: The mean age of the patients was $17.2{\pm}4.6years$ (range, 12-49 years), with most (65.0%) being female and of New Zealand European origin (91.3%). Individuals with hyperdivergent facial types had higher overall and social domain scores on the OHIP-14 (p < 0.05) than did the ones with normodivergent facial types. However, the intergroup differences in JFLS-8 scores were not significant (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Jaw function appears to be similar in individuals with hyperdivergent and normodivergent facial morphologies. However, those with hyperdivergent facial types are more likely to self-report poorer OHRQoL than are those with normal faces, especially in relation to social aspects.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Tuominen ML, Tuominen RJ. Factors associated with subjective need for orthodontic treatment among Finnish university applicants. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:106-10. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359409029063
  2. Ryan FS, Barnard M, Cunningham SJ. Impact of dentofacial deformity and motivation for treatment: a qualitative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141:734-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.12.026
  3. Foster Page LA, Thomson WM, Jokovic A, Locker D. Validation of the child perceptions questionnaire (CPQ 11-14). J Dent Res 2005;84:649-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910508400713
  4. O'Brien C, Benson PE, Marshman Z. Evaluation of a quality of life measure for children with malocclusion. J Orthod 2007;34:185-93; discussion 176. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531207225022185
  5. Choi SH, Kim JS, Cha JY, Hwang CJ. Effect of malocclusion severity on oral health-related quality of life and food intake ability in a Korean population. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2016;149:384-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.08.019
  6. Locker D, Jokovic A, Prakash P, Tompson B. Oral health-related quality of life of children with oligodontia. Int J Paediatr Dent 2010;20:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.01001.x
  7. Johal A, Cheung MY, Marcene W. The impact of two different malocclusion traits on quality of life. Br Dent J 2007;202:E2. https://doi.org/10.1038/bdj.2006.122
  8. Schendel SA, Eisenfeld J, Bell WH, Epker BN, Mishelevich DJ. The long face syndrome: vertical maxillary excess. Am J Orthod 1976;70:398-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(76)90112-3
  9. Rusanen J, Lahti S, Tolvanen M, Pirttiniemi P. Quality of life in patients with severe malocclusion before treatment. Eur J Orthod 2010;32:43-8. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjp065
  10. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984;86:67-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9416(84)90278-1
  11. Johnston DJ, Hunt O, Johnston CD, Burden DJ, Stevenson M, Hepper P. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 2005;27:349-54. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cji023
  12. Gomes SG, Custodio W, Faot F, Del Bel Cury AA, Garcia RC. Masticatory features, EMG activity and muscle effort of subjects with different facial patterns. J Oral Rehabil 2010;37:813-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02075.x
  13. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997;25:284-90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.1997.tb00941.x
  14. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. The relationship between normative orthodontic treatment need and oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2003;31:426-36. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1600-0528.2003.00002.x
  15. John MT, Hujoel P, Miglioretti DL, LeResche L, Koepsell TD, Micheelis W. Dimensions of oral-healthrelated quality of life. J Dent Res 2004;83:956-60. https://doi.org/10.1177/154405910408301213
  16. Ohrbach R, Granger C, List T, Dworkin S. Preliminary development and validation of the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2008;36:228-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00397.x
  17. Larsson P. Methodological studies of orofacial aesthetics, orofacial function and oral health-related quality of life. Swed Dent J Suppl 2010;(204):11-98.
  18. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angl Orthod 1952;22:142-5.
  19. Locker D. Oral health indicators and determinants for population health surveys. Community Dental Health Services Research Unit. Toronto: University of Toronto; 2001.
  20. de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A. Orthodontic treatment and its impact on oral health-related quality of life in Brazilian adolescents. J Orthod 2004;31:20-7; discussion 15. https://doi.org/10.1179/146531204225011364
  21. Lee S, McGrath C, Samman N. Quality of life in patients with dentofacial deformity: a comparison of measurement approaches. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2007;36:488-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2007.01.011
  22. Broder HL, Slade G, Caine R, Reisine S. Perceived impact of oral health conditions among minority adolescents. J Public Health Dent 2000;60:189-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-7325.2000.tb03326.x
  23. Panek H, Nawrot P, Mazan M, Bielicka B, Sumislawska M, Pomianowski R. Coincidence and awareness of oral parafunctions in college students. Community Dent Health 2012;29:74-7.
  24. Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders: review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord 1992;6:301-55.
  25. Ohrbach R, Larsson P, List T. The jaw functional limitation scale: development, reliability, and validity of 8-item and 20-item versions. J Orofac Pain 2008;22:219-30.
  26. Valera FC, Travitzki LV, Mattar SE, Matsumoto MA, Elias AM, Anselmo-Lima WT. Muscular, functional and orthodontic changes in pre school children with enlarged adenoids and tonsils. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:761-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-5876(03)00095-8
  27. Betzenberger D, Ruf S, Pancherz H. The compensatory mechanism in high-angle malocclusions: a comparison of subjects in the mixed and permanent dentition. Angle Orthod 1999;69:27-32.
  28. Van der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Van Heck G, Kuijpers- Jagtman AM. Smile attractiveness. Self-perception and influence on personality. Angle Orthod 2007;77:759-65. https://doi.org/10.2319/082606-349
  29. Cochrane SM, Cunningham SJ, Hunt NP. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999;14:291-5.
  30. Zheng DH, Wang XX, Su YR, Zhao SY, Xu C, Kong C, et al. Assessing changes in quality of life using the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP) in patients with different classifications of malocclusion during comprehensive orthodontic treatment. BMC Oral Health 2015;15:148. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-015-0130-7
  31. Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI--the Dental Aesthetic Index. College of Dentistry, University of Iowa Iowa City; 1986.
  32. John MT, Reissmann DR, Szentpetery A, Steele J. An approach to define clinical significance in prosthodontics. J Prosthodont 2009;18:455-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2009.00457.x

피인용 문헌

  1. The impact of oro‐facial appearance on oral health‐related quality of life: A systematic review vol.48, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12965
  2. Four‐dimensional oral health‐related quality of life impact in children: A systematic review vol.48, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.13066