Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

  • 제27권4호
  • /
  • Pages.739-746
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1017-7825(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-8872(eISSN)
한국미생물·생명공학회 (The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Oral Delivery of Probiotics in Poultry Using pH-Sensitive Tablets

  • Jiang, Tao (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Li, Hui-Shan (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Han, Geon Goo (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Singh, Bijay (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kang, Sang-Kee (Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Bok, Jin-Duck (Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Dae-Duk (College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Hong, Zhong-Shan (Department of Animal Science, Tianjin Agricultural University) ;
  • Choi, Yun-Jaie (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Cho, Chong-Su (Department of Agricultural Biotechnology and Research Institute for Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2016.06.30
  • 심사 : 2017.01.11
  • 발행 : 2017.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

As alternatives to antibiotics in livestocks, probiotics have been used, although most of them in the form of liquid or semisolid formulations, which show low cell viability after oral administration. Therefore, suitable dry dosage forms should be developed for livestocks to protect probiotics against the low pH in the stomach such that the products have higher probiotics survivability. Here, in order to develop a dry dosage forms of probiotics for poultry, we used hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate 55 (HPMCP 55) as a tablet-forming matrix to develop probiotics in a tablet form for poultry. Here, we made three different kinds of probiotics-loaded tablet under different compression forces and investigated their characteristics based on their survivability, morphology, disintegration time, and kinetics in simulated gastrointestinal fluid. The results indicated that the probiotics formulated in the tablets displayed higher survival rates in acidic gastric conditions than probiotics in solution. Rapid release of the probiotics from the tablets occurred in simulated intestinal fluid because of fast swelling of the tablets in neutral pH. As a matrix of tablet, HPMCP 55 provided good viability of probiotics after 6 months under refrigeration. Moreover, after oral administration of probiotics-loaded tablets to chicken, more viable probiotics were observed, than with solution type, through several digestive areas of chicken by the tablets.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Allen HK, Levine UY, Looft T, Bandrick M, Casey TA. 2013. Treatment, promotion, commotion: antibiotic alternatives in food-producing animals. Trends Microbiol. 21: 114-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.001
  2. Stanton TB. 2013. A call for antibiotic alternatives research. Trends Microbiol. 21: 111-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tim.2012.11.002
  3. Laniewski P, Mitra A, Karaca K, Khan A, Prasad R, Curtiss R, Roland KL. 2014. Evaluation of protective efficacy of live attenuated Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum vaccine strains against fowl typhoid in chickens. Clin. Vaccine Immunol. 21: 1267-1276. https://doi.org/10.1128/CVI.00310-14
  4. Kwon Y-K, Kim A, Kang M-S, Her M, Jung B-Y, Lee K-M, et al. 2010. Prevalence and characterization of Salmonella Gallinarum in the chicken in Korea during 2000 to 2008. Poult. Sci. 89: 236-242. https://doi.org/10.3382/ps.2009-00420
  5. Wells JM, Mercenier A. 2008. Mucosal delivery of therapeutic and prophylactic molecules using lactic acid bacteria. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 6: 349-362. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrmicro1840
  6. Lee S, Lillehoj H, Dalloul R , Park D, Hong Y, Lin J. 2007. Influence of Pediococcus-based probiotic on coccidiosis in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 86: 63-66. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/86.1.63
  7. Song A. 2012. Selection and characterization of lactic acid bacteria with improved antimicrobial activity to poultry diarrhea inducing-pathogen by genome shuffling. Dissertation. Seoul National University.
  8. Gong J, Zheng H, Wu Z, Chen T, Zhao X. 2009. Genome shuffling: progress and applications for phenotype improvement. Biotechnol. Adv. 27: 996-1005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.05.016
  9. Santos CNS, Stephanopoulos G. 2008. Combinatorial engineering of microbes for optimizing cellular phenotype. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 12: 168-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2008.01.017
  10. Klayraung S, Viernstein H, Okonogi S. 2009. Development of tablets containing probiotics: effects of formulation and processing parameters on bacterial viability. Int. J. Pharm. 370: 54-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.11.004
  11. Edens F. 2003. An alternative for antibiotic se in poultry: probiotics. Rev. Bras. Cienc. Avic. 5: 75-97. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-635X2003000200001
  12. Stadler M, Viernstein H. 2003. Optimization of a formulation containing viable lactic acid bacteria. Int. J. Pharm. 256: 117-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-5173(03)00068-1
  13. e Silva JS, Sousa SC, Costa P, Cerdeira E, Amaral MH, Lobo JS, et al. 2013. Development of probiotic tablets using microparticles: viability studies and stability studies. AAPS PharmSciTech 14: 121-127. https://doi.org/10.1208/s12249-012-9898-9
  14. Calinescu C, Mulhbacher J, Nadeau E, Fairbrother JM, Mateescu MA. 2005. Carboxymethyl high amylose starch (CM-HAS) as excipient for Escherichia coli oral formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 60: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.12.006
  15. Wang X-Q, Zhang Q. 2012. pH-sensitive polymeric nanoparticles to improve oral bioavailability of peptide/protein drugs and poorly water-soluble drugs. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 82: 219-229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2012.07.014
  16. Olnood CG, Beski SS, Iji PA, Choct M. 2015. Delivery routes for probiotics: effects on bird performance, intestinal morphology and gut microflora. Anim. Nutr. 1: 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aninu.2015.07.002
  17. Fonseca F, Cenard S, Passot S. 2015. Freeze-drying of lactic acid bacteria, pp. 477-488. Cryopreservation and Freeze-Drying Protocols. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg. Germany.
  18. Ferreira V, Soares V, Santos C, Silva J, Gibbs PA, Teixeira P. 2005. Survival of Lactobacillus sakei during heating, drying and storage in the dried state when growth has occurred in the presence of sucrose or monosodium glutamate. Biotechnol. Lett. 27: 249-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10529-004-8351-x
  19. Chan ES, Zhang Z. 2005. Bioencapsulation by compression coating of probiotic bacteria for their protection in an acidic medium. Process Biochem. 40: 3346-3351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2005.03.001
  20. Leuschner RG, Bew J, Simpson PJ, Ross PR, Stanton C. 2003. Enumeration of probiotic pediococci in animal feed: interlaboratory study. J. AOAC Int. 86: 791-801.
  21. Solanki HK, Pawar DD, Shah DA, Prajapati VD, Jani GK, Mulla AM, Thakar PM. 2013. Development of microencapsulation delivery system for long-term preservation of probiotics as biotherapeutics agent. Biomed Res. Int. 2013: 620719.
  22. Collins JW, La Ragione RM, Woodward MJ, Searle LE. 2009. Application of prebiotics and probiotics in livestock, pp. 1123-1192. Prebiotics and Probiotics Science and Technology. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg. Germany.
  23. Calinescu C, Mulhbacher J, Nadeau E, Fairbrother JM, Mateescu MA. 2005. Carboxymethyl high amylose starch (CM-HAS) as excipient for Escherichia coli oral formulations. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm. 60: 53-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpb.2004.12.006
  24. Sorensen TL, Blom M, Monnet DL, Frimodt-Moller N, Poulsen RL, Espersen F. 2001. Transient intestinal carriage after ingestion of antibiotic-resistant Enterococcus faecium from chicken and pork. N. Engl. J. Med. 345: 1161-1166. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa010692
  25. Anal AK, Singh H. 2007. Recent advances in microencapsulation of probiotics for industrial applications and targeted delivery. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 18: 240-251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2007.01.004

피인용 문헌

  1. The use of probiotics as eco-friendly alternatives for antibiotics in poultry nutrition vol.25, pp.11, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1687-x
  2. A New Method of Producing a Natural Antibacterial Peptide by Encapsulated Probiotics Internalized with Inulin Nanoparticles as Prebiotics vol.28, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1712.12008
  3. Probiotics in aquaculture: a promising emerging alternative approach vol.77, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13199-018-0580-1
  4. Oral Delivery of Probiotics Using pH-Sensitive Phthalyl Inulin Tablets vol.29, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1811.11021
  5. Biointerfacial self-assembly generates lipid membrane coated bacteria for enhanced oral delivery and treatment vol.10, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13727-9
  6. Isolation and evaluation of putative probiotic strains from different teleost to prevent Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection in Cyprinus carpio vol.50, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1111/are.14318
  7. Prebiotic activity of garlic ( Allium sativum ) extract on Lactobacillus acidophilus vol.12, pp.12, 2017, https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.2046-2051
  8. Overview of the Use of Probiotics in Poultry Production vol.11, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11061620
  9. Bacteria-Based Microdevices for the Oral Delivery of Macromolecules vol.13, pp.10, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13101610
  10. Nutritional and Health Potential of Probiotics: A Review vol.11, pp.23, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311204