환경영향평가 (Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment)

한국환경영향평가학회 (Korean Society of Environmental Impact Assessment)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

철도개발지 선정을 위한 환경·생태적 가치 지표 평가

Evaluation of the environmental and ecological value indicators for railway development area selection

  • 김민경 (성균관대학교 대학원 조경학과, 한국철도기술연구원 미래전략센터) ;
  • 김동엽 (성균관대학교 건설환경공학부)
  • Kim, Min-kyeong (Dept. of Landscape Architecture, Graduate School, Sungkyunkwan University, Future strategy Center R&d Strategy Division, Korea Railroad Research Institute) ;
  • Kim, Dong Yeob (School of Civil, Architectural Engineering and Landscape Architecture, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.25
  • 심사 : 2017.03.27
  • 발행 : 2017.04.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 국토의 산악자원을 활용한 철도를 도입하는 등 산악관광 활성화를 도모하려는 움직임이 나타나고 있으며, 친환경 교통수단으로의 철도수송 분담률을 증대시키려는 정책이 수행됨에 따라 단선철도의 복선화 및 선형개량 사업 등 전국 철도망이 확대되고 있는 추세이다. 그러나 "환경친화적 철도지침"에 따르면, 철도건설 시 고려해야 할 주요 환경영향평가항목으로 대기질, 수질, 지형 지질, 동 식물상, 자연환경자산, 소음 진동, 위락 경관 등 7개 항목을 선언적으로만 제시하고 있으며, 특히 동 식물상과 자연환경자산 항목에서는 법제적 측면에서 환경보호지역의 유무만을 고려하고 있다. 이에 따라 본 연구에서는 환경 생태적 가치를 정량적 평가항목으로 고려할 것을 제안하였고, 이를 계량적으로 뒷받침하기 위해 평가 지표와 평가 항목을 선정하고 각각의 주제도와 철도망을 중첩하여 분석하였다. 주요 지표로 자연성과 다양성을 선정하였고, 각 지표별 항목의 평점을 산정하여 철도개발지 선정에 반영하고자 하였다. 이와 같은 평가 방법을 활용하여 추후 환경친화적인 철도건설에 적용할 수 있을 것으로 판단된다.

Recently mountain tourism has been promoted and introduction of railroads with utilizing mountain resources is being planned. With the government policies to increase the share of eco-friendly transportation on railroad, national double-tracking of single rail and improvement projects are on going. However, the eco-friendly railroad policy suggests the environmental impact assessment items only on air quality, water quality, geographical/geological features, fauna/flora, natural/environmental resources, noise/ vibration, and recreation/landscape. And for fauna/flora and natural/environmental resources, confirming the presence of environmental protection zone is enough to satisfy legal requirement. This study suggested to evaluate environmental/ecological values with quantitative data. Evaluation indices and evaluation items have been selected to provide the data. Each of the subject map and railroad network was overlapped. The study selected naturalness and diversity as major indicators and calculated weight values of the items under the indicators, which are to be usd for the selection of the sites for railway development. This assessment method could be applied to the environmentally friendly construction of railroads in the future.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Branquart EK, Verheyen, Latham J. 2008. Selection criteria of protected forest areas in Europe: The theory and the real world. Biological conservation. 141: 2795-2906. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.08.015
  2. Genelett D. 2004. A Gis-based decision support system to identify nature conservation priorities in an alpine valley. Land use policy. 21: 149-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.09.005
  3. Kang HG, Park TK, Kim HL, Lee SE. 2009. Drawing of habitat assessment map and conservation value assessment for environmental friendly road construction. Korean society of environmental engineers. 31(8): 611-618. [Korean Literature]
  4. Lee DK, Jeon SW, Lee SM. 2004. Theoretical review of environment-oriented land suitability analysis and setting of EOLSA criteria and classification system. the korea society of environmental restoration technology. 7(1): 116-127. [Korean Literature]
  5. Lee GG. 2009. A model to support spatial decision making for selection of ecotourism sites in urban and regional area. The Korea society of environmental restoration technology. 12(2): 50-60. [Korean Literature]
  6. Ministry of Environment. 2007. A study of the setting criteria for the national ecological network. [Korean Literature]
  7. Ministry of Environment. 2013. A management business of the Environmental conservation value assessment map. [Korean Literature]
  8. Ministry of Environment. 2014. Statistical Environment of Natural Environment Based on Statistics. [Korean Literature]
  9. Ministry of Environment and Ministry of Land Infrastructure and Transport. 2015. Guideline of environment-friendly railway construction. [Korean Literature]
  10. Park CS, Rho PH, Park YH, Yoon KR, Park JJ. 2010. A strategy for the wise use of natural resources in korea. [Korean Literature]
  11. Park JJ, Yoon KR, Park CS. 2011. The developmental directions and classification of regional types based on natural resources. Journal of the korean institute of landscape architecture. 39(2): 10-17. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2011.39.2.010
  12. Park YH, lee HW, Kim KG, Lee GG, Choi JY, Heo SJ, Seo GW. 2008. Development of designation criteria for ecological protected areas and its application methodology. Environmental impact assessment. 17(3):177-188. [Korean Literature]
  13. Pressey RL, Nicholls AO. 1989. Efficiency in conservation evaluation: Scoring versus iterative approaches. Biological conservation. 50: 199-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-3207(89)90010-4
  14. Ratcliffe DA. 1977. A nature conservation review. Cambridge university press.
  15. Research Institute for Gangwon. 2016. Gangwondo and mountain tourism. [Korean Literature]
  16. Ser YH, Jin YH, Koo BH. 2012. A study of environment ecological appropriateness assessment for eco-railroad route selection. Korean institute of spatial design. 7(4): 9-16. [Korean Literature]

피인용 문헌

  1. 철도 개발지 완충지역 기준 설정에 대한 연구 vol.5, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2018.5.1.045
  2. 도로와의 이격거리를 고려한 철도사업의 환경생태적 영향 최소화 방안에 대한 연구 vol.7, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.17820/eri.2020.7.3.160
  3. Quantification of the Ecological Value of Railroad Development Areas Using Logistic Regression Analysis vol.18, pp.22, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182211764