Journal of Industrial Convergence (산업융합연구)

DAEHAN Society of Industrial Management (대한산업경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Patent Valuation for SMEs' Patent Management

중소기업의 특허경영을 위한 특허가치평가에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2017.11.06
  • Accepted : 2017.12.01
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In light of the fact that the effect of intellectual property rights like patent on enterprise competitiveness is growing, rational valuation of patent rights, which are own by enterprises, is required because accurate patent valuation can bring about the activation of the technology exchange market and enhancing the values of enterprises as well as the security of funds through technology security. However, in reality, interest in the value of patent rights is not great due to many variables, affecting patent rights, and diverse attributes, and non-generalized methods of valuation. Therefore, studies on patent valuation for patent management of Small and Medium Enterprises is required. This thesis examined patent valuation for the patent management of Small and Medium Enterprises based on literature studies, and attempted to find factors, affecting patent valuation by finding patent valuation factors through experts, organizing, and analyzing these factors. 10 essential factors, which are demonstrated in this research, are the commercialization possibilities of technology, market competitiveness, the possibility of technology commercialization, market size, the originality of acquired technology, the stability of the right(the possibility of invalidating), the level of technology, technology competitiveness, the ripple effect of technology, and the characteristics of technology(original technology/application technology).

특허 등의 지식재산권이 기업 경쟁력에 미치는 영향이 커지고 있다는 사실에 비추어 볼 때에, 유형자산과 마찬가지로 기업이 소유하고 있는 지식재산인 특허권의 합리적인 가치평가가 매우 중요하다. 왜냐하면 특허가치의 정확한 평가는 기술거래시장의 활성화를 가져올 수 있고, 기술담보를 통한 자금력 확보와 더불어 기업의 가치를 제고할 수 있어 특허전략 수립에 필수적이기 때문이다. 그러나 특허권이 얼마만큼의 가치를 가지는가에 대해서는 관심이 크지 않다는 것이 현실이며, 이유는 특허권에 영향을 미치는 변수가 너무 많고 그 속성 또한 다양하며, 가치를 평가하는 방법 또한 일반화되어 있지 않기 때문이다. 그래서 중소기업의 특허경영을 위한 특허가치평가에 관한 연구가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 문헌연구를 통해 중소기업의 특허경영을 위해 특허가치평가들을 살펴보았고, 전문가들을 대상으로 특허가치평가 요인들을 찾아내어 이들을 체계적으로 정리하여 중소기업의 특허경영을 위한 특허가치평가에 중요한 요인들을 분석하여, 특허가치평가에 영향을 미치는 요인들을 찾아보았다. 최종적으로 나타난 중요한 요인 10개는 기술의 사업화 가능성, 시장경쟁력, 기술의 상업화 가능성, 시장규모, 보유기술의 독창성, 권리의 안정성(무효화 가능성), 기술의 수준, 기술경쟁력, 기술의 파급효과, 기술의 성격(원천기술/응용기술)으로 나타났다.

Keywords

References

  1. http://www.mss.go.kr/site/smba/06/10602010000002016102405.jsp
  2. W.S., Choi. (2009). Patent Trends in Korea 2008. Patent 21, (87), 23-41.
  3. http://www.etnews.co.kr/201102010055
  4. Y.K., Kim, S.T., Park, S.J., Lee. (2009). A Study on Valuation Factors of Patent. Journal of Digital Convergence, 7(2), 63-70.
  5. http://www.kipo.go.kr
  6. http://www.kookje.co.kr/news2011/asp/newsbody.asp?code=0200&key=20110407.22016214205
  7. http://likms.assembly.go.kr/law/jsp/EnfLawView.jsp?LAW_ID=A1327
  8. Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not) (No. w7552). National Bureau of Economic Research.
  9. http://www.kibo.or.kr/src/tech/kbb600.asp
  10. Capon, N., & Glazer, R. (1987). Marketing and technology: a strategic coalignment. The Journal of Marketing, 1-14.
  11. Boer, F. P. (1999). The valuation of technology: Business and financial issues in R&D (Vol. 1). Wiley.
  12. Hyun-Woo Park. (2005). An Empirical Study of Determinants of Technology Value in Korea. Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 8(2), 623-649.
  13. Sun Young, Park. (2007). Development of a Categorized Checklist for Valuation of Patent Technology. The Journal of Intellectual Property, 2(1), 30-56.
  14. S.T., Park. (2010). Analysis of the Relative Importance of Patent Valuation Criteria for Product Categories. Chungbuk national University, Doctoral thesis.
  15. Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes-validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research policy, 33(6-7), 939-957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.02.004
  16. Park, W. G., & Wagh, S. (2002). Index of patent rights. Economic freedom of the world: 2002 annual report, 33-43.
  17. Y.K., Kim, S.T., Park, S.J., Lee. (2010). Selection of important factors for Patent Valuation using Delphi Method, 9(1), 7-17.
  18. K.S., Chung, M.H., Kang, Y. Kim. (2004). A Delphi Study on Software Project Risks. The Journal of information systems, 13(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.2308/jis.1999.13.1.1
  19. Schmidt, R. C. (1997). Managing Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. decision Sciences, 28(3), 763-774. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1997.tb01330.x
  20. Schmidt, R., Lyytinen, K., Keil, M., & Cule, P. (2001). Identifying software project risks: An international Delphi study. Journal of management information systems, 17(4), 5-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2001.11045662
  21. Small and Medium Business Administration. (2005). Small and Medium Business Technical Evaluation Standard Model Evaluation Manual.
  22. J.B., Park. (2008).The Actual Condition and Developmental Challenges of Korea's Technology Commercialization, Korea Institute for Industrial Economics & Trade.
  23. http://www.imaeil.com/sub_news/sub_news_view.php?news_id=19583&yy=2011