Information Systems Review (경영정보학연구)

The Korea Society of Management Information Systems (한국경영정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Empirical Analysis of Post-Merger Risk Following the M&As of IT Firms

IT 기업의 인수합병 이후 수익율 변동성에 대한 실증 분석

  • Young Bong Chang (Business School, Sungkyunkwan University) ;
  • YoungOk Kwon (Division of Business Administration, Sookmyung Women's University)
  • 장영봉 (성균관대학교 경영학부) ;
  • 권영옥 (숙명여자대학교 경영학부)
  • Received : 2017.11.06
  • Accepted : 2017.12.29
  • Published : 2017.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Although economic growth has been retarded since the global economic crisis over recent decades, a large number of firms consider mergers and acquisitions (M and A) as a strategy to survive in a highly competitive market. In particular, an increasing number of firms pursue M and A with IT firms in recent years. In this study, we analyze the post-merger risks measured as ROA volatility for acquiring firms when they seek to acquire an IT firm. Our analysis suggests that a firm with prior experience in M and A acquires IT firms aggressively. Moreover, a substantial number of IT firms are relatively small and unlisted when they are acquired. We also show that an acquiring firm's post-merger risk (i.e., ROA volatility) increases after its acquisition of IT firms. However, an increase in post-merger risk is alleviated when relatedness exists between an acquiring firm and target.

범세계적 경제위기 이후 많은 기업들은 극심한 경쟁 하에서의 생존 및 경쟁력 강화/유지 전략으로 인수합병(M&A)을 고려하고 있으며, 특히 최근 들어 IT 기반 기술 집약적 기업의 인수합병이 증가하고 있다. 본 연구는 IT 산업에 내재되어 있는 특성에 대한 이해를 바탕으로 IT 기업 인수시 동반되는 위험을 인수합병 이후 기업의 성과에 대한 변동성을 이용하여 정량적으로 측정하고, 더 나아가 인수합병으로 인한 장기적 위험을 완화시킬 수 있는 요인들을 도출하고자 하였다. 1990년에서 2016년까지 이루어진 기업 인수합병 데이터를 이용하여 분석한 결과, 상장 이전 인수/합병 경험이 많은 기업이 IT 기업을 인수하는데 더 적극적이며, 네트워크 외부성 효과로 인해 시장형성 초기 선점효과의 역할이 증대됨에 따라 상대적으로 규모가 작은 비상장 IT 기업들도 많이 인수/합병 대상이 된 것으로 나타났다. 또한 IT 기업을 인수하는 경우 인수 기업의 사후적 기업 성과의 변동성이 증가하지만, 관련 (related) 산업 내에서 IT 기업을 인수할 경우 변동성 증가폭이 완화되는 것을 보여준다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

이 논문은 2016년 대한민국 교육부와 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2016S1A5A8019124).

References

  1. Anand, J. and H. Singh, "Asset redeployment, acquisitions and corporate strategy in declining industries", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.18, No.S1, 1997, pp. 99-118. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<99::AID-SMJ928>3.0.CO;2-B
  2. Baker McKenzie and Oxford Economics, "Technology M&A to Hit Highest Level Since 2000 Next Year", 2007, Available at http://www.bakermckenzie.com/en/newsroom/2017/02/tech-and-telecoms-mergers/.
  3. Berger, P. G. and E. Ofek, "Diversification's effect on firm value", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.37, No.1, 1995, pp. 39-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)00798-6
  4. Bharadwaj, A. S., "A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation", MIS Quarterly, Vol.24, No.1, 2000, pp. 169-196. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250983
  5. Chang, Y. B. and V. Gurbaxani, "Information technology outsourcing, knowledge transfer, and firm productivity: An empirical analysis", MIS Quarterly, Vol.36, No.4, 2012, pp. 1043-1063. https://doi.org/10.2307/41703497
  6. Daley, L., V. Mehrotra, and R. Sivakumar, "Corporate focus and value creation: Evidence from spinoffs", Journal of Financial Economics, Vol.45, No.2, 1997, pp. 257-281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(97)00018-4
  7. Dedrick, J., V. Gurbaxani, and K. L. Kraemer, "Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence", ACM Computing Surveys(CSUR), Vol.35, No.1, 2003, pp. 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1145/641865.641866
  8. Dewan, S. and F. Ren, "Information technology and firm boundaries: Impact on firm risk and return performance", Information Systems Research, Vol.22, No.2, 2011, pp. 369-388. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1090.0261
  9. Economist, "Two Kings Get Together; Google and YouTube", Oct. 14, 2006, p. 82, Available at http://www.economist.com/node/8031159.
  10. Hill, C. W. L. and G. R. Jones, Theory of Strategic Management with Cases (8th ed.) South-Western, 2009.
  11. Houston J. F., C. M. James, and M. D. Ryngaert, "Where do merger gains come from? Bank mergers from the perspective of insiders and outsiders", Journal of Financial Economicsc, Vol.60, No.2, 2001, pp. 285-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(01)00046-0
  12. Irvine, P. J. and J. Pontiff, "Idiosyncratic return volatility, cash flows, and product market competition", Review of Financial Studies, Vol.22, No.3, 2009, pp. 1149-1177. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn039
  13. Kamakura, W. A., M. Wedel, F. de Rosa, and J. A. Mazzon, "Cross-selling through database marketing: A mixed data factor analyzer for data augmentation and prediction", International Journal of Research in Marketing, Vol.20, No.1, 2003, pp. 45-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8116(02)00121-0
  14. Kohers, N. and T. Kohers, "The value creation potential of high-tech mergers", Financial Analysts Journal, Vol.56, No.3, 2000, pp. 40-51. https://doi.org/10.2469/faj.v56.n3.2359
  15. Larsson, R. and S. Finkelstein, "Integrating strategic, organizational, and human resource perspectives on mergers and acquisitions: A case survey of synergy realization", Organization Science, Vol.10, No.1, 1999, pp. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.1.1
  16. Maksimovic, V. and G. Phillips, "The industry life cycle, acquisitions and investment: Does firm organization matter?", The Journal of Finance, Vol.63, No.2, 2008, pp. 673-708. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01328.x
  17. Mansi, S. A. and D. M. Reeb, "Corporate diversification: what gets discounted?", The Journal of Finance, Vol.57, No.5, 2002, pp. 2167-2183. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00492
  18. Markides, C. and P. J. Williamson, "Corporate diversification and organizational structure: A resource-based view", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.39, No.2, 1996, pp. 340-367. https://doi.org/10.2307/256783
  19. Moeller, S. B., F. P. Schlingemann, and R. M., Stulz, "Do shareholders of acquiring firms gain from acquisitions?", National Bureau of Economic Research, Vol.w9523, 2003.
  20. Singh, H. and C. A. Montgomery, "Corporate acquisition strategies and economic performance", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.8, No.4, 1987, pp. 377-386. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080407
  21. Nevo, S. and M. R. Wade, "The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships", MIS Quarterly, Vol.34, No.1, 2010, pp. 163-183. https://doi.org/10.2307/20721419
  22. Pablo, A. L., S. B. Sitkin, and D. B. Jemison, "Acquisition decision-making processes: The central role of risk", Journal of Management, Vol.22, No.5, 1996, pp.723-746. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639602200503
  23. Park, C., "The effects of prior performance on the choice between related and unrelated acquisitions: implications for the performance consequences of diversification strategy", Journal of Management Studies, Vol.39, No.7, 2002, pp. 1003-1019. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00321
  24. Park, C., "Prior performance characteristics of related and unrelated acquirers", Strategic Management Journal, Vol.24, No.5, 2003, pp. 471-480. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.310
  25. Priem, R. L., "A consumer perspective on value creation", Academy of Management Review, Vol.32, No.1, 2007, pp. 219-235. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23464055
  26. Ray, G., W. A. Muhanna, and J. B. Barney, "Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis", MIS Quarterly, Vol.29, No.4, 2005, pp. 625-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148703
  27. Tanriverdi, H. and C. Lee, "Within-industry diversification and firm performance in the presence of network externalities: Evidence from the software industry", Academy of Management Journal, Vol.51, No.2, 2008, pp. 381-397. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.31767300