DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Difference in Spinal Fusion Process in Osteopenic and Nonosteopenic Living Rat Models Using Serial Microcomputed Tomography

  • Park, Sung Bae (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Yang, Hee-Jin (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center) ;
  • Kim, Chi Heon (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chung, Chun Kee (Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.07.07
  • Accepted : 2016.11.22
  • Published : 2017.05.01

Abstract

Objective : To identify and investigate differences in spinal fusion between the normal and osteopenic spine in a rat model. Methods : Female Sprague Dawley rats underwent either an ovariectomy (OVX) or sham operation and were randomized into two groups: non-OVX group and OVX group. Eight weeks after OVX, unilateral lumbar spinal fusion was performed using autologous iliac bone. Bone density (BD) was measured 2 days and 8 weeks after fusion surgery. Microcomputed tomography was used to evaluate the process of bone fusion every two weeks for 8 weeks after fusion surgery. The fusion rate, fusion process, and bone volume parameters of fusion bed were compared between the two groups. Results : BD was significantly higher in the non-OVX group than in the OVX group 2 days and 8 weeks after fusion surgery. The fusion rate in the non-OVX group was higher than that in the OVX group 8 weeks after surgery (p=0.044). The bony connection of bone fragments with transverse processes and bone formation between transverse processes in non-OVX group were significantly superior to those of OVX group from 6 weeks after fusion surgery. The compactness and bone maturation of fusion bed in non-OVX were prominent compared with the non-OVX group. Conclusion : The fusion rate in OVX group was inferior to non-OVX group at late stage after fusion surgery. Bone maturation of fusion bed in the OVX group was inferior compared with the non-OVX group. Fusion enhancement strategies at early stage may be needed to patients with osteoporosis who need spine fusion surgery.

Keywords

References

  1. Aldini NN, Fini M, Giavaresi G, Giardino R, Greggi T, Parisini P : Pedicular fixation in the osteoporotic spine: a pilot in vivo study on long-term ovariectomized sheep. J Orthop Res 20 : 1217-1224, 2002 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-0266(02)00069-4
  2. Bae HW, Zhao L, Kanim LE, Wong P, Marshall D, Delamarter RB : Bone marrow enhances the performance of rhBMP-2 in spinal fusion: a rodent model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 : 338-347, 2013 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01118
  3. Boden SD : Biology of lumbar spine fusion and use of bone graft substitutes: present, future, and next generation. Tissue Eng 6 : 383-399, 2000 https://doi.org/10.1089/107632700418092
  4. Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Hutton WC : An experimental lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion model. Radiographic, histologic, and biomechanical healing characteristics. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 412-420, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199502001-00003
  5. Boden SD, Schimandle JH, Hutton WC, Chen MI : 1995 Volvo Award in basic sciences. The use of an osteoinductive growth factor for lumbar spinal fusion. Part I: Biology of spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20 : 2626-2632, 1995 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199512150-00003
  6. Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, Muller R : Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 25 : 1468-1486, 2010 https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.141
  7. Bridwell KH, Sedgewick TA, O'Brien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C : The role of fusion and instrumentation in the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord 6 : 461-472, 1993 https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-199306060-00001
  8. Coe JD, Warden KE, Herzig MA, McAfee PC : Influence of bone mineral density on the fixation of thoracolumbar implants. A comparative study of transpedicular screws, laminar hooks, and spinous process wires. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 15 : 902-907, 1990 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199009000-00012
  9. Kamoda H, Ohtori S, Ishikawa T, Miyagi M, Arai G, Suzuki M, et al. : The effect of platelet-rich plasma on posterolateral lumbar fusion in a rat model. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95 : 1109-1116, 2013 https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00320
  10. Moazzaz P, Gupta MC, Gilotra MM, Gilotra MN, Maitra S, Theerajunyaporn T, et al. : Estrogen-dependent actions of bone morphogenetic protein-7 on spine fusion in rats. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 1706-1711, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000172230.01655.55
  11. Nakao S, Minamide A, Kawakami M, Boden SD, Yoshida M : The influence of alendronate on spine fusion in an osteoporotic animal model. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : 1446-1452, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f49c47
  12. Namkung-Matthai H, Appleyard R, Jansen J, Hao Lin J, Maastricht S, Swain M, et al. : Osteoporosis influences the early period of fracture healing in a rat osteoporotic model. Bone 28 : 80-86, 2001 https://doi.org/10.1016/S8756-3282(00)00414-2
  13. Omi N, Ezawa I : Animal models for bone and joint disease. Low calcium diet-induced rat model of osteoporosis. Clin Calcium 21 : 173-180, 2011.
  14. Park SB, Chung CK : Strategies of spinal fusion on osteoporotic spine. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 49 : 317-322, 2011 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2011.49.6.317
  15. Park SB, Kim CH, Hong M, Yang HJ, Chung CK : Effect of a selective estrogen receptor modulator on bone formation in osteoporotic spine fusion using an ovariectomized rat model. Spine J 16 : 72-81, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2015.08.061
  16. Schindeler A, McDonald MM, Bokko P, Little DG : Bone remodeling during fracture repair: the cellular picture. Semin Cell Dev Biol 19 : 459-466, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.004
  17. Takahata M, Ito M, Abe Y, Abumi K, Minami A : The effect of anti-resorptive therapies on bone graft healing in an ovariectomized rat spinal arthrodesis model. Bone 43 : 1057-1066, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2008.08.124
  18. Toribatake Y, Hutton WC, Tomita K, Boden SD : Vascularization of the fusion mass in a posterolateral intertransverse process fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23 : 1149-1154, 1998 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199805150-00015
  19. Wiltse LL, Spencer CW : New uses and refinements of the paraspinal approach to the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13 : 696-706, 1988 https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198813060-00019
  20. Xu SW, Yu R, Zhao GF, Wang JW : Early period of fracture healing in ovariectomized rats. Chin J Traumatol 6 : 160-166, 2003
  21. Zipfel GJ, Guiot BH, Fessler RG : Bone grafting. Neurosurg Focus 14 : e8, 2003

Cited by

  1. Comparison of Extragraft Bone Formation after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Using Simultaneous and Sequential Algorithms vol.11, pp.4, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/app11041487