DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Investigation Into the Impact of Limiting Carbon Emissions on the Korean Power System and the Electricity Market

  • Kim, Changseob (Dept. of Energy IT, College of Engineering, Gacheon University) ;
  • Park, Hyeongon (Dept. of Statistics, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.11.04
  • Accepted : 2017.02.17
  • Published : 2017.05.01

Abstract

To address mounting concerns over global warming, the Paris Agreement was reached in December 2015, which aims to limit the increase in global average temperature. South Korea has set a highly ambitious target to reduce emissions and submitted an Intended Nationally Determined Contribution (INDC). Based on the INDC, we investigated the impact of limiting carbon emissions on the power system and the electricity market in Korea. Through detailed simulations on assumed plausible scenarios, this work highlights a) the effects of different carbon emission targets on the annual carbon emission volumes, generation costs, and carbon price; b) the generation mix changes induced by carbon emission limits; and c) the difference in system marginal price and payments for generator owners that carbon emission constraint creates in electricity markets under three different pricing rules.

Keywords

References

  1. P. Agreement, "United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change," Paris, France, 2015.
  2. U. Secretariat, "Synthesis Report on the Aggregate Effect of the Intended Nationally Determined Contributions," in Bonn, Germany: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2015.
  3. B. L.P., "How Ambitious are the Post-2020 Targets? Assessing the INDCs: comparing apples with oranges," 2015.
  4. GGCC, "The Carbon Budgets That Will Prevent the Average Temperature of the Earth's Surface from Increasing by More than $2^{\circ}C$ when Compared with the Temperature of the Pre-industrial Era.," 2015.
  5. Y. Ha, J. Joo, M. Kang, T. Lah, and J. Jang, "Social conflicts and policy-making in Korea: Interpretation of policy failures through a public discourse perspective," International Review of Administrative Sciences, vol. 75, pp. 649-664, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309351447
  6. T. Priestley and G. W. Evans, "Resident perceptions of a nearby electric transmission line," Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 16, pp. 65-74, 1996. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0006
  7. N. F. Pidgeon, I. Lorenzoni, and W. Poortinga, "Climate change or nuclear power - No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain," Global Environmental Change, vol. 18, pp. 69-85, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.09.005
  8. P. Ekins, G. Anandarajah, and N. Strachan, "Towards a low-carbon economy: scenarios and policies for the UK," Climate Policy, vol. 11, pp. 865-882, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0126
  9. C. Erdmenger, H. Lehmann, K. Muschen, J. Tambke, S. Mayr, and K. Kuhnhenn, "A climate protection strategy for Germany - 40% reduction of $CO_2$ emissions by 2020 compared to 1990," Energy Policy, vol. 37, pp. 158-165, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.07.031
  10. K. Shimada, Y. Tanaka, K. Gomi, and Y. Matsuoka, "Developing a long-term local society design methodology towards a low-carbon economy: An application to Shiga Prefecture in Japan," Energy Policy, vol. 35, pp. 4688-4703, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2007.03.025
  11. "Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: Australia's Low Pollution Future," A. Government, Ed., ed, 2008.
  12. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "The 7th Basic Plan for Long-term Electricity Supply and Demand(2015-2029)," 2015.
  13. D. G. Luenberger, Introduction to linear and nonlinear programming vol. 28: Addison-Wesley Reading, MA, 1973.
  14. M. Carrion and J. M. Arroyo, "A computationally efficient mixed-integer linear formulation for the thermal unit commitment problem," IEEE Transactions on power systems, vol. 21, pp. 1371-1378, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2006.876672
  15. C. K. Simoglou, P. N. Biskas, and A. G. Bakirtzis, "Optimal self-scheduling of a thermal producer in short-term electricity markets by MILP," IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 25, pp. 1965-1977, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2010.2050011
  16. F. Capitanescu, J. M. Ramos, P. Panciatici, D. Kirschen, A. M. Marcolini, L. Platbrood, et al., "State-of-the-art, challenges, and future trends in security constrained optimal power flow," Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 81, pp. 1731-1741, 2011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2011.04.003
  17. Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, "Korea Energy Master Plan-outlook & policies to 2035," 2014.
  18. Korea Power Exchange (KPX). (2016). Electric Power Statistics Information System. Available: http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/epsis/
  19. EIA, U., "Updated capital cost estimates for electricity generation plants," US Energy Information Administration, Office of Energy Analysis, Washington, DC, USA, 2010.