Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies (아세아태평양축산학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Seasonal variation in growth of Berkshire pigs in alternative production systems

  • Park, Hyeon-Suk (Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University) ;
  • Oh, Sang-Hyon (Department of Animal Sciences, College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University)
  • Received : 2016.08.04
  • Accepted : 2016.11.03
  • Published : 2017.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objective: The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of farrowing month (FM), parity and sex on the growth performance of Berkshire swine raised in alternative production systems. Methods: A total of 40 farrowing records from 27 sows and 1,258 body weight (BW) records from 274 piglets collected over a two-year period were used for the analysis. The BWs were recorded at birth, weaning (28 d), 56, 84, 112, and 140 days. Any BW not recorded on schedule was recalculated to conform the days of age among corresponding BW records, using growth curves drawn with polynomial functions whose power was determined by the number of existing observations for each individual. Results: The mean parity (${\pm}$standard deviation) of the sows was $3.42{\pm}2.14$. The sows that farrowed in June had the lowest number of total born with an average of $6.25{\pm}2.22$ piglets per sow. However, the lowest average number of piglets weaned at day 28 was found in sows that farrowed in May, as well as the highest number recorded for the stillborn piglets with an average of 2.67 piglets per sow. Moreover, the smallest increase in weight from birth to weaning occurred in piglets that were farrowed in May, which also corresponds with the average daily gain (ADG) of 0.29 kg and the last recorded weight measurement on day 140 of $41.69{\pm}1.45kg$. Contrastingly, the highest growth rate was found among pigs farrowed in June, with the largest increase in weight of 7.55 kg from birth to weaning, the highest ADG of 0.51 kg from birth to 140 day of age and the highest BW of $74.70{\pm}1.86kg$ recorded on day 140. Conclusion: Pigs farrowed in June also had the least number of piglets that died between birth and weaning. The zone of thermal comfort found in sows reared in indoor confinement systems did not improve the reproductive performance of the sows reared in an outdoor, alternative production system, while the growth performance of the piglets was improved when the ambient temperature was consistently hot or consistently cold.

Keywords

References

  1. Honeyman MS. Extensive bedded indoor and outdoor pig production systems in USA: current trends and effects on animal care and product quality. Livest Prod Sci 2005;94:15-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.029
  2. Whitley N, Hanson D, Morrow W, See MT, Oh SH. Comparison of pork quality and sensory characteristics for antibiotic free Yorkshire crossbreds raised in hoop houses. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2012;25:1634-40. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2012.12296
  3. Kleinbeck SN, McGlone JJ. Intensive indoor versus outdoor swine production systems: Genotype and supplemental iron effects on blood hemoglobin and selected immune measures in young pigs. J Anim Sci 1999;77:2384-90. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.7792384x
  4. Sather AP, Jones SDM, Schaefer AL, Colyn J, Robertson WM. Feedlot performance, carcass composition and meat quality of free-range reared pigs. Can J Anim Sci 1997;77:225-32. https://doi.org/10.4141/A96-093
  5. Muriel E, Ruiz J, Ventanas J, Antequera T. Free-range rearing increases (n-3) polyunsaturated fatty acids of neutral and polar lipids in swine muscles. Food Chem 2002;78:219-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-8146(01)00401-0
  6. Suzuki K, Shibata T, Kadowaki H, Abe H, Toyoshima T. Meat quality comparison of Berkshire, Duroc and crossbred pigs sired by Berkshire and Duroc. Meat Sci 2003;64:35-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00134-1
  7. Swantek PM, Roush WB, Stender DR, et al. Feed intake and growth rate in purebred berkshire pigs housed in hoop buildings in Iowa; 2013. Animal industry report. AS 659, ASL R2834.
  8. Gegner L. Hog production alternatives: ATTRA's Organic Matters Series; 2004.
  9. NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, Climate at a Glance: U.S. Time Series, Precipitation [Internet]; 2016 [cited 2016 Oct 3]. Available from: http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/cag/
  10. Brown JE, Fitzhugh HA Jr., Cartwright TC. A comparison of nonlinear models for describing weight-age relationships in cattle. J Anim Sci 1976;42:810-8. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1976.424810x
  11. Knizetova H, Hyanek J, Knize B, Roubicek J. Analysis of growth curves of fowl. I. Chickens. Br Poult Sci 1991;32:1027-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00071669108417427
  12. Krieter J, Kalm E. Growth, feed intake and mature size in Large White and Pietrain pigs. J Anim Breed Genet 1989;106:300-11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0388.1989.tb00244.x
  13. Coyne JM, Berry DP, Mantysaari EA, Juga J, McHugh N. Comparison of fixed effects and mixed model growth functions in modeling and predicting live weight in pigs. Livest Sci 2015;177:8-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2015.03.031
  14. Shull CM. Modeling growth of pigs reared to heavy weights [Dissertation]. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 2013.
  15. Kohn F, Sharifi AR, Simianer H. Modeling the growth of the Goettingen minipig. J Anim Sci 2007;85:84-92. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2006-271
  16. Sasaki Y, Tokunaga T, Uemura R, Sueyoshi M. An assessment of reproductive and lifetime performances of Kagoshima Berkshire gilts and sows. Anim Sci J 2014;85:213-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/asj.12140
  17. Gade PB. Welfare of animal production in intensive and organic systems with special reference to Danish organic pig production. Meat Sci 2002;62:353-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(02)00123-7
  18. Miao ZH, Glatz PC, Ru YJ. Review of production, husbandry and sustainability of free-range pig production systems. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2004;17:1615-34. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2004.1615
  19. Gentry JG, McGlone JJ, Miller MF, Blanton JR Jr. Environmental effects on pig performance, meat quality, and muscle characteristics. J Anim Sci 2004;82:209-17. https://doi.org/10.2527/2004.821209x
  20. Black JL, Mullan BP, Lorschy ML, Giles LR. Lactation in the sow during heat stress. Livest Prod Sci 1993;35:153-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-6226(93)90188-N
  21. Mullan BP, Brown W, Kerr M. The response of the lactating sows to ambient temperature. Proc Nutr Soc Aust 1992;17:215.
  22. Vidal JM, Edwrds SA, MacPherson O, English PR, Taylor AG. Effect of environmental temperature on dietary selection in lactating sows. Anim Prod 1991;52:597.

Cited by

  1. Reproductive Performance of a New GF24 Female Gilt Line Reared under Different Conditions in Vietnam vol.12, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3923/ajas.2018.23.29
  2. Effects of heat stress on piglet production/performance parameters vol.50, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1633-4
  3. Modeling swine population dynamics at a finer temporal resolution vol.36, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1002/asmb.2597