DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Efficient transgene expression system using a cumate-inducible promoter and Cre-loxP recombination in avian cells

  • Park, Tae Sub (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Si Won (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jeong Hyo (Graduate School of International Agricultural Technology and Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2016.09.18
  • Accepted : 2016.10.18
  • Published : 2017.06.01

Abstract

Objective: Transgenic technology is widely used for industrial applications and basic research. Systems that allow for genetic modification play a crucial role in biotechnology for a number of purposes, including the functional analysis of specific genes and the production of exogenous proteins. In this study, we examined and verified the cumate-inducible transgene expression system in chicken DF1 and quail QM7 cells, as well as loxP element-mediated transgene recombination using Cre recombinase in DF1 cells. Methods: After stable transfer of the transgene with piggyBac transposon and transposase, transgene expression was induced by an appropriate concentration of cumate. Additionally, we showed that the transgene can be replaced with additional transgenes by co-transfection with the Cre recombinase expression vector. Results: In the cumate-GFP DF1 and QM7 cells, green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression was repressed in the off state in the absence of cumate, and the GFP transgene expression was successfully induced in the presence of cumate. In the cumate-MyoD DF1 cells, MyoD transgene expression was induced by cumate, and the genes controlled by MyoD were upregulated according to the number of days in culture. Additionally, for the translocation experiments, a stable enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP)-expressing DF1 cell line transfected with the loxP66-eGFP-loxP71 vector was established, and DsRed-positive and eGFP-negative cells were observed after 14 days of co-transfection with the DsRed transgene and Cre recombinase indicating that the eGFP transgene was excised, and the DsRed transgene was replaced by Cre recombination. Conclusion: Transgene induction or replacement cassette systems in avian cells can be applied in functional genomics studies of specific genes and adapted further for efficient generation of transgenic poultry to modulate target gene expression.

Acknowledgement

Grant : Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development

Supported by : Rural Development Administration

References

  1. van de Lavoir MC, Diamond JH, Leighton PA, et al. Germline transmission of genetically modified primordial germ cells. Nature 2006; 441:766-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04831
  2. Park TS, Han JY. piggyBac transposition into primordial germ cells is an efficient tool for transgenesis in chickens. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109:9337-41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1203823109
  3. Macdonald J, Taylor L, Sherman A, et al. Efficient genetic modification and germ-line transmission of primordial germ cells using piggyBac and Tol2 transposons. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012;109: E1466-72. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1118715109
  4. Park TS, Lee HJ, Kim KH, Kim JS, Han JY. Targeted gene knockout in chickens mediated by TALENs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014;111: 12716-21. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1410555111
  5. Mayo KE, Warren R, Palmiter RD. The mouse metallothionein-I gene is transcriptionally regulated by cadmium following transfection into human or mouse cells. Cell 1982;29:99-108.
  6. Lee F, Mulligan R, Berg P, Ringold G. Glucocorticoids regulate expression of dihydrofolate reductase cDNA in mouse mammary tumour virus chimaeric plasmids. Nature 1981;294:228-32. https://doi.org/10.1038/294228a0
  7. Gossen M, Bujard H. Tight control of gene expression in mammalian cells by tetracycline-responsive promoters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1992;89:5547-51. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.89.12.5547
  8. Hoess RH, Ziese M, Sternberg N. P1 site-specific recombination: nucleotide sequence of the recombining sites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1982;79:3398-402. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.79.11.3398
  9. Sauer B, Henderson N. Site-specific DNA recombination in mammalian cells by the Cre recombinase of bacteriophage P1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1988;85:5166-70. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.14.5166
  10. Rossant J, Nagy A. Genome engineering: the new mouse genetics. Nature Med 1995;1:592-4. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm0695-592
  11. Koo BC, Kwon MS, Lee H, et al. Tetracycline-dependent expression of the human erythropoietin gene in transgenic chickens. Transgenic Res 2010;19:437-47.
  12. Mullick A, Xu Y, Warren R, et al. The cumate gene-switch: a system for regulated expression in mammalian cells. BMC Biotechnol 2006;6:43. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-6-43
  13. Arakawa H, Lodygin D, Buerstedde JM. Mutant loxP vectors for selectable marker recycle and conditional knock-outs. BMC Biotechnol 2001;1:7. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6750-1-7
  14. Dragatsis I, Zeitlin S. A method for the generation of conditional gene repair mutations in mice. Nucleic Acids Res 2001;29:e10. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/29.3.e10
  15. Morimura T, Goitsuka R, Zhang Y, et al. Cell cycle arrest and apoptosis induced by Notch1 in B cells. J Biol Chem 2000;275:36523-3. https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M006415200