Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences

  • 제30권6호
  • /
  • Pages.755-764
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1011-2367(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1976-5517(eISSN)
아세아태평양축산학회 (Asian Australasian Association of Animal Production Societies)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Farm to abattoir conditions, animal factors and their subsequent effects on cattle behavioural responses and beef quality - A review

  • 투고 : 2016.01.14
  • 심사 : 2016.09.05
  • 발행 : 2017.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The current review seeks to highlight the concerns that have been raised on pre-slaughter stress, contributing factors and its consequent effects on cattle behavioural responses and the quality of beef; inter-linking the activities involved from birth to slaughter. Such information is crucial in light of the consumer concerns on overall animal welfare, quality of meat and food security. Slaughter animals are exposed to different conditions during production and transportation to abattoirs on a daily basis. However; the majority of studies that have been done previously singled out different environments in the meat production chain, while conclusions have been made that the welfare of slaughter animals and the quality of meat harvested from them is dependent on the whole chain. Behaviour is a critical component used to evaluate the animals' wellbeing and it has been reported to have an effect on product quality. Apart from the influence of on-farm, transportation and abattoir conditions, the genetic background of the animal also affects how it perceives and responds to certain encounters. Stress activates the animals' hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal activity, triggering release of various stress hormones such as catecholamines and cortisol, thus glycogen depletion prior slaughter, elevated ultimate pH and poor muscle-meat conversion. Pre-slaughter stress sometimes results to cattle attaining bruises, resulting to the affected parts of the carcass being trimmed and condemned for human consumption, downgrading of the carcass and thus profit losses.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Boissy A, Erhard HW. Chapter 3: How studying interactions between animal emotions, cognition, and personality can contribute to improve farm animal welfare. 2nd ed. In: Grandin T, Deesing MJ, editors. Genetics and the behaviour of domestic animals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2014. p. 81-113.
  2. Waiblinger SC, Boivin X, Pedersen V, et al. Assessing the human-animal relationship in farmed species: A critical review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;101:185-242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.02.001
  3. Grandin T. Transferring results of behavioural research to industry to improve animal welfare on the farm, ranch and slaughter plant. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;81:215-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00282-4
  4. Probst JK, Hillmann E, Leiber F, Kreuzer M, Neff AS. Influence of gentle touching applied few weeks before slaughter on avoidance distance and slaughter stress in finishing cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013;144:14-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.12.007
  5. Probst JK, Neff AS, Hillmann E, et al. Relationship between stressrelated exsanguination blood variables, vocalisation, and stressors imposed on cattle between lairage and stunning box under conventional abattoir conditions. Livest Sci 2014;164:154-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2014.03.013
  6. Ndou SP, Muchenje V, Chimonyo M. Assessment and implications of animal welafere in beef production systems in developing countries. Afr J Biotechnol 2011;10:1049-64.
  7. Ferguson DM, Warner RD. Have we underestimated the impact of pre-slaughter stress on meat in ruminants? Meat Sci 2008;80: 12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.004
  8. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Villarroel M, Maria GA. Livestock transport from the perspective of the pre-slaughter logistic chain: A review. Meat Sci 2014;98:9-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.005
  9. Grandin T. Animal welfare and society concerns finding the missing link. Meat Sci 2014;98:461-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.011
  10. Vimiso P, Muchenje V, Marume U, Chiruka R. Preliminary study on consumers’ and meat traders’ perceptions of beef quality and how the beef quality is affected by animal welfare practices. Sci Res Essays 2012;7:2037-48.
  11. Grandin T. Assessment of stress during handling and transport. J Anim Sci 1997;75:249-57. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.751249x
  12. de Passille AM, Rushen J. Can we measure human-animal interactions in on-farm animal welfare assessment? Some unresolved issues. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;92:193-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.006
  13. Terlouw C. Stress reactions at slaughter and meat quality in pigs: genetic background and prior experience: A brief review of recent findings. Livest Prod Sci 2005;94:125-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livprodsci.2004.11.032
  14. Mota-Rojas D, Becerril M, Lemus C, et al. Effects of mid-summer transport duration on pre-and post-slaughter performance and pork quality in Mexico. Meat Sci 2006;73:404-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2005.11.012
  15. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, et al. Some biochemical aspects pertaining to beef eating quality and consumer health: A review. Food Chem 2009;112:279-89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.05.103
  16. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Strydom PE, Raats JG. Relationship between pre-slaughter stress responsive and beef quality in three cattle breeds. Meat Sci 2009;81:653-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.004
  17. Chulayo AY, Tada O, Muchenje V. Research on pre-slaughter stress and meat quality: A review of challenges faced under practical conditions. Appl Anim Husb Rural Dev 2012;5:1-6.
  18. Broom DM, Fraser AF. Domestic animal behaviour and welfare. 4th ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2007.
  19. Broom DM. Welfare assessment and problem areas during handling and transport. In: Grandin, T editor, Livestock Handling, Transport. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2000. p. 43-61.
  20. Hemsworth PH, Rice M, Karlen MG, et al. Human-animal interactions at abattoirs: Relationships between handling and animal stress in sheep and cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;135:24-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.09.007
  21. O'Neill HA, Webb EC, Frylinck L, Strydom PE. The stress responsiveness of three different breed types and the effect on ultimate pH and meat colour. In: Proceedings of 52nd International congress of meat science and technology from 13 to 18 August 2006; Dublin, Ireland. 2006. p. 181-2.
  22. Bourguet C, Deiss V, Tannugi CC, Terlouw EMC. Behavioural and physiological reactions of cattle in a commercial abattoir: Relationships with organisational aspects of the abattoir and animal characteristics. Meat Sci 2011;88:158-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.12.017
  23. Boissy A. Fear and fearfulness in determining behaviour. In: Grandin T, editor. Genetics and behaviour of domestic animals. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1998. p. 67-111.
  24. Raussi S. Human-Cattle interactions in group housing. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;80:245-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(02)00213-7
  25. Tarrant PV. Transportation of cattle by road. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1990;28:153-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(90)90051-E
  26. Tarrant PV, Kenny FJ, Harrington D, Murphy M. Long distance transportation of steers to slaughter: effect of stocking density on physiology, behaviour, and carcass quality. Livest Prod Sci 1992; 30:223-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(06)80012-6
  27. Minka NS, Ayo JO. Physiological and behavioural responses of goats to 12-hour road transportation, lairage and grazing periods, and the modulatory role of ascorbic acid. J Vet Behav 2013;8:349-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jveb.2013.01.001
  28. Grandin T. The feasibility of using vocalization scoring as an indicator of poor welfare during cattle slaughter. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998;56:121-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(97)00102-0
  29. Grandin T. Cattle vocalizations are associated with handling and equipment problems in beef slaughter plants. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001;2:191-201.
  30. Gregory NG. Recent concerns about stunning and slaughter. Meat Sci 2005;70:481-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2004.06.026
  31. Gregory NG. Animal welfare at markets and during transport and slaughter. Meat Sci 2008;80:2-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.05.019
  32. Gregory NG, Fielding HR, von Wenzlawowicz M, von Holleben K. Time to collapse following slaughter without stunning in cattle. Meat Sci 2010;85:66-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.12.005
  33. Gregory NG, Schuster P, Mirabito L, Kolesar R, McManus T. Arrested blood flow during false aneurysm formation in the carotid arteries of cattle slaughtered with and without stunning. Meat Sci 2012;90: 368-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2011.07.024
  34. Agbeniga B, Webb EC. Effect of slaughter technique on bleed-out, blood in the trachea and blood splash in the lungs of cattle. S Afr J Anim Sci 2012;42: 524-29.
  35. Njisane YZ, Muchenje V. Influence of municipal abattoir conditions and animal-related factors on avoidance-related behaviour, bleeding times at slaughter and the quality of lamb meat. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2013;26:1496-503.
  36. Njisane YZ, Muchenje V. Quantifying avoidance-related behaviour and bleeding times of sheep of different ages, sex and breeds slaughtered at a municipal and a commercial abattoir. S Afr J Anim Sci 2013;43:S38-S42.
  37. Farouk MM. Advances in the industrial production of Halal and Kosher red meat. Meat Sci 2013;95:805-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.028
  38. Farouk MM, Al-Mazeedi HM, Sabow AB, et al. Halal and Kosher slaughter methods and meat quality: A review. Meat Sci 2014;98: 505-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.05.021
  39. Farouk MM, Regenstein JM, Pirie MR, et al. Spiritual aspects of meat and nutritional security: Perspectives and responsibilities of the Abrahamic faiths. Food Res Int 2015;76:882-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2015.05.028
  40. Grandin T. Observations of cattle behaviour applied to the design of cattle handling facilities. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1980;6:19-31.
  41. McGreevy P. Notes on some topics in applied animal behaviour [Internet]. In: Chapter 5, Design of facilities for management of livestock; 2003 [Cited 2012 Jan 17]. Available from: www.animal behaviour.net
  42. Dodzi MS, Muchenje V. Avoidance-related behavioural variables and their relationship to milk yield in pasture-based dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2011;133:11-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2011.04.014
  43. Grandin T. Behavioural agitation during handling of cattle is persistent over time. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1993;36:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(93)90094-6
  44. Voisinet BD, Grandin T, O’Connor SF, Tatum JD, Deesing MJ. Bos indicus-cross feedlot cattle with excitable temperaments have tougher meat and a higher incidence of borderline dark cutters. Meat Sci 1997;46:367-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00031-4
  45. Hansen I, Cristiansen F, Hansen HS, Braastad B, Bakken M. Variation in behaviour response of ewes towards predator-related stimuli. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2001;70:227-37. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00155-6
  46. Lambe NR, Conington J, Bishop SC, Waterhouse A, Simm G. A genetic analysis of maternal behaviour score in Scottish Blackface sheep. J Anim Sci 2001;72:415-25.
  47. Vierin M, Bouisson MF. Responses of weaned lambs to fear eliciting situations: origin of individual differences. Dev Psychobiol 2003; 42:131-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.10090
  48. Dodd CL, Pitchford WS, Edwards JEH, Hazel SJ. Measures of behavioural reactivity and their relationships with production traits in sheep: A review. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;140:1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.03.018
  49. Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz JHM, Gallo CB, Kemp B. Prevalence and risk factors for bruises in Chileon bovine carcasses. Meat Sci 2010;86:859-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.07.010
  50. Dweyer C. The behaviour of sheep and goats. In: Jensen P, editor. The Ethology of domestic animals, An introductory text. 2nd ed. Wallingford, UK: CABI; 2009. p. 161-76.
  51. Njisane YZ. Farm to abattoir conditions and their subsequent effects on behavioural and physiological changes and the quality of beef from extensively-reared Nguni and non-descript steers [PhD thesis]. Alice, South Africa: University of Fort Hare; 2016.
  52. Weeks CA, McNally PW, Warriss PD. Influence of the design of facilities at auction markets and animal handling procedures on bruising in cattle. Vet Rec 2002;150:743-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.150.24.743
  53. Lee C, Fisher AD, Colditz IG, Lea JM, Ferguson DM. Preference of beef cattle for feedlot or pasture environments. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2013;145:53-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2013.03.005
  54. Breed MD, Moore J. Chapter 4-Homeostasis and Time Budgets (Abstract). In: Breed DB, Moore J, editors, Animal behaviour. 2nd ed. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2016. p. 104-44.
  55. Breuer K, Hemsworth PH, Barnett JL, Matthews RL, Coleman GJ. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2000;66:273-88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(99)00097-0
  56. Mounier L. On-farm welfare assessment in dairy cattle, improving animal welfare: a practical approach. Presented in Barcelona, 1-2 December 2011. Directorate-General for health and consumers. 2011.
  57. Markowitz TM, Dally MR, Gursky K, Price EO. Early handling increases lamb affinity for humans. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1998; 55:573-87. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1997.0640
  58. Probst JK, Neff AS, Leiber F, Kreuzer M, Hillmann E. Gentle touching in early life reduces avoidance distance and slaughter stress in beef cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;139:42-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.03.002
  59. Lay Jr. DC, Friend TH, Grissom KK, Hale RL, Bowers CL. Novel breeding box has variable effects on heart rate and cortisol response of cattle. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992;35:1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(92)90011-Y
  60. Boissy A, Veissier I, Roussel S. Behavioural reactivity affected by chronic stress: an experimental approach in calves submitted to environmental instability. Anim Welf 2001;10:175-85.
  61. Hutson GD. The influence of barley food rewards on sheep involvement through a handling system (Cited by Grandin, 1993). Appl Anim Behav Sci 1985;14:263-73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-1591(85)90007-3
  62. Pascoe PJ. Humaneness of electrical immobilization unit for cattle (Cited by Grandin, 1993). Am J Vet Res 1986;10:2252-6.
  63. Hemsworth PH, Coleman GJ. Human-Livestock interactions. In: The stockperson and the productivity of intensively farmed animals. Wallingford, CT: CAB International; 1998.
  64. Warriss PD. Meat Science: An introductory text. Wallingford, UK: CAB International; 2000. p. 312.
  65. Schaefer AL, Jones SDM, Stanley RW. The use of electrolyte solutions for reducing transport stress. J Anim Sci 1997;75:258-65. https://doi.org/10.2527/1997.751258x
  66. Mitchell MA, Kettlewell PJ. Physiological and welfare of broiler chickens in transit; solutions not problems! Poult Sci 1998;77: 1803-14. https://doi.org/10.1093/ps/77.12.1803
  67. Swanson JC, Morrow-Tesch J. Cattle transport: Historical, research, and future perspectives. J Anim Sci 2001;79:E102-E9. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas2001.79E-SupplE102x
  68. Kadim, IT, Mahgoub O, Al-Kindi A, Al-Marzooqi W, Al-Saqri NM. Effects of transportation at high ambient temperatures on physiological responses, carcass and meat quality characteristics of three breeds of Omani goats. Meat Sci 2006;73:626-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2006.03.003
  69. Knowles TG. A review of the road transportation of cattle. Vet Rec 1999;144:197-201. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.144.8.197
  70. Honkavaara M., Rintasalo E, Ylonenand J, Pudas T. Meat quality and transport stress in cattle. Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr 2003; 110:125-8.
  71. Knights M, Smith GW. Decreased ACTH secretion during prolonged transportation stress is associated with reduced pituitary responsiveness to tropic hormone stimulation in cattle. Domest Anim Endocrinol 2007;33:442-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.09.001
  72. Leme TMC, Titto EAL, Titto CG, Periera AMF. Influence of transportation methods and pre-slaughter rest periods on cortisol levels in lambs. Small Rumin Res 2012;107:8-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2012.05.010
  73. Hulbert LE, Carroll JA, Burdick NC, et al. Innate immune responses of temperamental and calm cattle after transportation. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2011;143:66-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetimm.2011.06.025
  74. Odore R, D'Angelo A, Badino P, et al. Road transportation affects blood hormone levels and lymphocyte glucocorticoid and b-adrenergic receptor concentrations in calves. Vet J 2004;168:297-03. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2003.09.008
  75. Tarrant PV, Kenny FJ, Harrington D. The effect of stocking density during 4 hour transport to slaughter on behaviour, blood constituents and carcass bruising in Friesian steers. Meat Sci 1988;24: 209-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0309-1740(88)90079-4
  76. Kadim IT, Mahgoub O, Al-Marzooqi W, et al. Effects of transportation during the hot season and low voltage electrical stimulation on histochemical and meat quality characteristics of sheep longissimus muscle. Livest Sci 2009;126:154-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2009.06.014
  77. Whiting TL. Comparison of minimum space allowance standards for transportation of cattle by road from 8 authorities. Can Vet J 2000;41:855-60.
  78. Miranda-de la Lama GC, Villarroel M, Liste G, Escosa J, Maria GA. Critical points in the pre-slaughter logistic chain of lambs in Spain that may compromise the animal’s welfare. Small Rumin Res 2010;90:174-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2010.02.011
  79. Terlouw EMC, Porcher J. Repeated handling of pigs during rearing. I. Refusal of contact by handler and reactivity to familiar and unfamiliar humans. J Anim Sci 2005;83:1653-63. https://doi.org/10.2527/2005.8371653x
  80. Grandin T. Progress and challenges in animal handling and slaughter in the US: Sentience in animals. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2006;100: 129-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.04.016
  81. Muchenje V, Dzama K, Chimonyo M, Raats JG, Strydom PE. Meat quality of Nguni, Bonsmara and Aberdeen Angus steers raised on natural pasture in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Meat Sci 2008;79:20-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2007.07.026
  82. Cetin O, Bingol EB, Colak H, Hampikyan H. Effects of electrical stimulation on meat quality of lamb and goat meat. Sci World J 2012;574202.
  83. Lawrie RD. Metabolic stress which affect muscle. In: Briskey EJ, Cassens RG, Trautman JC editor, The physiology and biochemistry of muscle as a food. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press; 1966. p. 137-64.
  84. Lahucky R, Palanska O, Mojto J, Zaujec K, Huba J. Effect of preslaughter handling on muscle glycogen level and selected meat quality traits in beef. Meat Sci 1998;50:389-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0309-1740(98)00042-4
  85. Warriss PD. Animal Welfare-handling animals before slaughter and the consequences for welfare and product quality. Oxon, England: Meat Focus International (July issue); 1992. p.135-138.
  86. Young JF, Bertram HC, Oksbjerg N. Rest before slaughter ameliorates pre-slaughter stress-induced increased drip loss but not stressinduced increase in the toughness of pork. Meat Sci 2009;83:634-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.07.019
  87. Wood JD, Holder JS, Main DCJ. Quality assurance schemes. Proceedings of the International Congress of Meat Science and Technology; Barcelona, Spain: 1998;44:206-215.
  88. FAO Corporate Document Repository. Guidelines for slaughtering meat cutting and further processing. FAO Animal production and health paper. 199191:170.
  89. Choe JH, Choi YM, Lee SH, et al. The relation of blood glucose level to muscle fiber characteristics and pork quality traits. Meat Sci 2009;83:62-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2009.03.011
  90. Warner RD, Ferguson DM, Cottrell JJ, Knee BW. Acute stress induced by the pre-slaughter use of electrical prodders causes tougher beef meat. Aust J Exp Agric 2007;47:782-8. https://doi.org/10.1071/EA05155
  91. Gruber SL, Tatum JD, Engle TE, et al. Relationships of behavioural and physiological symptoms of pre-slaughter stress to beef longissimus muscle tenderness. J Anim Sci 2010;88:1148-59. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2009-2183
  92. Gajana CS, Nkukwana TT, Marume U, Muchenje V. Effects of transportation time, distance, stocking density, temperature and lairage time on incidences of pale soft exudative (PSE) and the physico-chemical characteristics of pork. Meat Sci 2013;95:520-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.028
  93. Warner RD, Truscot TG, Eldridge GA, Franz PR. A survey of the incidence of high pH beef meat in Victorian abattoirs. In 34th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. Brisbane, Australia; 1998. p.150-151.
  94. Curley J, Neuendorff DA, Lewis AW, et al. Functional characteristics of the bovine hypothalamicpituitary-adrenal axis vary with temperament. Horm Behav 2008;53:20-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.08.005
  95. Mpakama T, Chulayo AY, Muchenje V. Bruising in slaughter cattle and its relationship with creatine kinase levels and beef quality as affected by animal related factors. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci 2014; 27:717-25. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2013.13483
  96. Strappini AC, Frankena K, Metz JHM, Gallo CB, Kemp B. Characteristics of bruises in carcasses of cows sourced from farms or from livestock markets. Anim 2012;6:502-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731111001698
  97. Vimiso P, Muchenje V. A survey on the effect of transport method on bruises, pH and colour of meat from cattle slaughtered at a South African commercial abattoir. S Afr J Anim Sci 2013;43: 105-11.
  98. Scholtz MM, McManus C, Okeyo AM, Theunissen A. Opportunities for beef production in developing countries of the southern hemisphere. Livest Sci 2011;142:195-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2011.07.014
  99. Bello M, Lawan MK, Aluwong T, Sanusi M. Management of slaughter houses in northern Nigeria and the safety of meat produced for human consumption. Food Control 2015; 49:34-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2013.09.007
  100. Animal Protection Act 1962. Act No. 71 of 1962. [Cited 2013 Aug]. Available from: http://www.daff.gov.za/doaDev/sideMenu/acts/11%20Animal%20Protection%20No71%20(1962).pdf
  101. Meat Safety Act 2000. Act No. 40 of 2000. [Cited 2013 Aug] http://www.daff.gov.za/doaDev/sideMenu/acts/21%20Meat%20Safety%20No40%20(2000).pdf
  102. Font-I-Furnols M, Realini C, Montossi F, et al. Consumer's purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: A conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Qual Pref 2011;22:443-51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.007
  103. Ferguson DM, Schreurs NM, Kenyon PR, Jacob RH. Balancing consumer and societal requirements for sheep meat production: An Australasian perspective. Meat Sci 2014;98:477-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.06.020
  104. Chulayo AY, Muchenje V. A balanced perspective on animal welfare for improved meat and meat products. S Afr J Anim Sci 2015;45: 452-69.
  105. Krohn CC, Munksgaard L, Jonasen B. Behavior of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments. 1. Experimental procedure, facilities, time budgets-diurnal and seasonal conditions. Appl Anim Behav Sci 1992;34:37-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(05)80055-3
  106. Legrand AL, Keyserlingk MAG, Weary DM. Preference and usage of pasture versus free-stall housing by lactating dairy cattle. J Dairy Sci 2009;92:3651-8. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2008-1733
  107. Meikle J. What exactly does the halal method of animal slaughter involve? 2014. [Cited 2016 Aug 11]. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/may/08/what-does-halal-method-animal-slaughter-involve
  108. Wemelsfelder F, Hunter TEA, Mendl MT, Lawrence AB. Assessing the ‘whole animal’: a free choice profiling approach. Anim Behav 2001;62:209-20. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2001.1741
  109. Waiblinger S, Menke C, Folsch DW. Influences on the avoidance and approach behaviour of dairy cows towards humans on 35 farms. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2003;84:23-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-1591(03)00148-5
  110. Minero M, Tosi MV, Canali E, Wemelsfelder F. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the response of foals to the presence of an unfamiliar human. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2009;116:74-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2008.07.001
  111. Stockman CA, McGilchrist P, Collins T, et al. Qualitative behavioural assessment of Angus steers during pre-slaughter handling and relationship with temperament and physiological responses. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2012;142:125-33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2012.10.016
  112. Petherick JC. Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: The northern Australian beef cattle industry. Appl Anim Behav Sci 2005;92:211-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2005.05.009

피인용 문헌

  1. Level of Pre-slaughter stress and quality of beef from Arsi, Boran and Harar cattle breeds in Ethiopia vol.5, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1694233
  2. Enhanced Antibacterial Activity of Silver Nanoparticles Combined with Hydrogen Peroxide Against Multidrug-Resistant Pathogens Isolated from Dairy Farms and Beef Slaughterhouses in Egypt vol.13, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.2147/idr.s271261
  3. Genetic Architecture of Carcass and Meat Quality Traits in Montana Tropical ® Composite Beef Cattle vol.11, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00123
  4. An outlook on livestock welfare conditions in African communities - A review vol.33, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.19.0282
  5. Sire Effects on Carcass of Beef-Cross-Dairy Cattle: A Case Study in New Zealand vol.11, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11030636
  6. Effect of pre-slaughter fasting duration on physiology, carcass and meat quality in beef cattle finished on pastures or feedlot vol.136, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2021.02.018
  7. Slaughter Conditions and Slaughtering of Pregnant Cows in Southeast Nigeria: Implications to Meat Quality, Food Safety and Security vol.10, pp.6, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10061298