DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Proposal for a Classification System and Evaluation Standards for Ensuring the Safety of Transport Ventilator in Korea

국내 운반형인공호흡기 안전성 확보를 위한 분류체계 및 평가기준 제안

  • Kim, Ji-Hyun (Department of Medical Device Industry, Graduate School of Dongguk University) ;
  • Cho, Sung-Ku (Department of Industrial & System Engineering, Dongguk University)
  • 김지현 (동국대학교 대학원 의료기기산업학과) ;
  • 조성구 (동국대학교 산업시스템공학과)
  • Received : 2017.05.01
  • Accepted : 2017.11.29
  • Published : 2017.12.30

Abstract

Objectives : This study aims to present a new classification system using evaluation standards to ensure the safety of transport ventilators used in Korea. Due to the rapid advancement of technology, various types of ventilators have been developed and as the range of application increases, so does demand. With quick access to information and a growing economy, the technology used in Korean hospitals is equivalent to that of other countries; however, regulatory and safety consciousness are still lagging in Korea. Methods : Based on researching overseas cases, reference data and standards for improving the current system in Korea are proposed. Results : According to the review of transport ventilator use in Korea, it was found that concerns about safety is due to the absence of a standardized classification system for evaluating the safety and effectiveness of transport ventilators. Conclusions : In order to improve the safety of patients and the quality of medical care, it is essential to establish guidelines and assessment standards guaranteeing the safety of transport ventilators in Korea. Clear definitions and classifications for devices must precede the application of such standards. In addition, effective evaluation standards should be developed in order to resolve problems and improve upon the current system through continuous validation.

Keywords

References

  1. B. Fanara, C. Manzon, O. Barbot, T. Desmettre, G. Capellier(2010), Recommendations for the intra-hospital transport of critically ill patients, Critical Care, Vol.14(3);87.
  2. S.R. Holets, J.D. Davies(2016), Should a portable ventilator be used in all in-hospital transports? Respiratory Care, Vol.61(6);839. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04745
  3. J.P.N. Papson, K.L. Russell, D.M. Taylor(2007), Unexpected Events during the Intrahospital Transport of Critically Ill Patients, Academic Emergency Medicine, Vol.14(6);574-577. https://doi.org/10.1197/j.aem.2007.02.034
  4. http://www.ecomedia.co.kr/news/newsview.php?ncode=1065574992087135
  5. http://www.medicaltimes.com/News/1100748
  6. HIRA(2016), Initial evaluation of ICU evaluation results!, Health Insurance Review and Evaluation Center Press Release, pp.2-3.
  7. Ministry of Public Safety and Security(2015), Fire Safety Grant Tax Guideline, pp.12-15.
  8. Ministry of Public Safety and Security(2016), Government disaster safety management is improving, Ministry of Public Safety and Security Press Release, pp.1-2.
  9. Ministry of Health and Welfare(2016), Air ambulance, 'Doctor Helicopter' Carries Over 5,000 PeopleMinistry of Health and Welfare Emergency Medical Service Press Release, pp.3-6.
  10. https://emed.mfds.go.kr/#!CECAB01F010
  11. MFDS(2017), MFDS Notification No.2017-6, Regulations on the classification of medical devices and items, pp.28-29.
  12. Department of Surgical Education(2003), IN-HOSPITAL TRANSPORT OF THE CRITICALLY ILL, Orlando Regional Medical Center, pp.1-3.
  13. The Global Medical Device Nomenclature Agency(2010), GMDN User Guide, pp.11-29.
  14. CADTH (Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health)(2010), Ventilation During Patient Transport: A Review of Clinical Effectiveness and Guidelines, Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health, p.1.
  15. S.H. Lee, J.R Lee, The Effect of Job Stress and Musculoskeletal Symptoms on Depression among Emergengy Medical Technicians. The Korean Journal of Health Service Management, Vol.9(4);63-78. https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2015.9.4.063
  16. C.W. Kerechanin, J.A. Vincent, D.G. Smith, D.S. Wenstrand(2004), Development of field portable ventilator systems for domestic and military emergency medical response, Johns Hopkins APL technical digest, Vol.25(3);215.
  17. D.W. Chipman, M.P. Caramez, E. Miyoshi, J.P. Kratohvil, R.M. Kacmarek(2007), Performance comparison of 15 transport ventilators, Respiratory care, Vol.52(6);740-751.
  18. E. L'Her, A. Roy, N. Marjanovic(2014), Bench-test comparison of 26 emergency and transport ventilators, Critical Care, Vol.18(5);1-14.
  19. N. Marjanovic, E. L'Her(2016), A Comprehensive Approach for the Ergonomic Evaluation of 13 Emergency and Transport Ventilators, Respiratory Care, Vol.61(5);632-639. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.04292
  20. MFDS(2016), MFDS Notification No.2016-90, Medical device standard (Particular requirement 29, Ventilator, Facility use, p.1.
  21. H.J. Kim, M.S. Kim(2009), Comparison of Climatic Environmental Test Standards of MIL-STD-810 and IEC Pub. 60068, Journal of Applied Reliability, Vol.9(2);81-91.
  22. Department of Defense, U.S.A.(2008), MIL-STD-810G- Environmental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Test, pp.13-14.
  23. M.J. Rouse, R. Branson, R. Semonin-Holleran (1992), Mechanical ventilation during air medical transport: Techniques and devices, Journal of Air Medical Transport, Vol.11(4);5-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1046-9095(05)80114-X
  24. D.R. Hess(2005), Essentials of mechanical ventilation, KOONJA, pp.3-23