Advances in Computational Design

  • 제2권2호
  • /
  • Pages.89-105
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 2383-8477(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-0523(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of current practice and associated challenges towards integrated design

  • Fadoul, Abdelaziz H. (Centre for Structural Engineering and Informatics (CSEI), Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham) ;
  • Tizani, Walid (Centre for Structural Engineering and Informatics (CSEI), Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham)
  • 투고 : 2016.10.12
  • 심사 : 2017.01.10
  • 발행 : 2017.04.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The AEC industry is highly interested in effective ICT adoption and deployment, including its utilization within the design process. However, its capabilities have not yet been fully exploited and it is an obvious area for further research. Architects and engineers tend to have some technological support to monitor and evaluate the possible impacts of decisions made throughout the design process. Many aspects are left out of consideration and the entire project is broken up into independent fragments or domains that are combined together at a later, post hoc stage. Impact of separate decisions on each others have to be interpreted on a person-to-person basis between the involved design stakeholders. This paper attempts to evaluate current design practice and associated challenges towards design integration with advanced technologies, such as BIM, by conducting an online survey targeted at designers and engineers, who are most affected by its emerging issues. The outcomes of this study are presented and analysed, concluding that the current design process fails to meet expectations and needs improvements. It goes further to propose the requirements for an integrated system as a means for an effective solution for the identified problem.

키워드

과제정보

연구 과제 주관 기관 : University of Khartoum, University of Nottingham

참고문헌

  1. Autodesk (2008), Improving Building Industry Results through Integrated Project Delivery and Building Information Modeling Report on Integrated Practice.
  2. Chi, H.L., Wang, X. and Jiao, Y. (2014), "BIM-enabled structural design: Impacts and future developments in structural modelling, analysis and optimisation processes", Arch. Comput. Meth. Eng., 22(1), 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11831-014-9127-7
  3. Chong, Y.T., Chen, C.H. and Leong, K.F. (2008), "A heuristic-based approach to conceptual design", Res. Eng. Des., 20(2), 97-116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-008-0059-9
  4. Egan, S.J. and Williams, D. (1998), "Rethinking construction", Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, Thomas Telford-ICE Virtual Library, 199-203.
  5. Gerold, F., Beucke, K. and Seible, F. (2012), "Integrative structural design", J. Comput. Civil Eng., 26(6), 720-726. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000180
  6. Ghassemi, R. and Becerik-Gerber, B. (2011), "Transitioning to integrated project delivery: Potential barriers and lessons learned", Lean Constr. J., 32-52.
  7. Golparvar-Fard, M., Tang, P., Cho, Y. and Siddiqui, M. (2013), "Grand challenges in data and information visualization for the architecture, engineering, construction, and facility management industries", Comput. Civil Eng., American Society of Civil Engineers.
  8. Gupta, S.D. (2015), Building Nation with BIM, Autodesk Map.
  9. Latham, S.M. (1994), Constructing the Team, Final Report of the Joint Government/Industry Review of Procurement and Contractual Arrangements in the United Kingdom Construction Industry, HM Stationery Office London.
  10. Moe, K. (2008), Integrated Design in Contemporary Architecture, Princeton Architectural Press, New York, U.S.A.
  11. Oshry, B. (2007), Seeing Systems: Unlocking the Mysteries of Organizational Life, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
  12. Parikh, S., Kolodziej, K. and Salas, C. (2010), "Life cycle safety and the design engineer", Electr. Constr. Maint.
  13. Prins, M. and Robert, O. (2010), "Integrated design and delivery solutions", Architect. Eng. Des. Manage., 6(4), 227-231. https://doi.org/10.3763/aedm.2010.IDDS0
  14. Prowler, D. (2012), Whole Building Design, Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG).
  15. Schlueter, A. and Thesseling, F. (2009), "Building information model based energy/exergy performance assessment in early design stages", Automat. Constr., 18(2), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2008.07.003
  16. Stavridou, V. (1999), "Integration in software intensive systems", J. Syst. Soft., 48(2), 91-104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00049-7
  17. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) (2013), Integrated Project Delivery: A Guide.
  18. Tizani, W. (2006), Engineering Design, Constructing the Future: nD Modelling, Taylor & Francis, London, U.K.
  19. Tizani, W., Smith, R. and Ruikar, D. (2005), "Virtual prototyping for engineering design", Proceedings of the Construction Application of Virtual Reality Conference.
  20. Ugwu, O., Anumba, C. and Thorpe, A. (2004), "The development of cognitive models for constructability assessment in steel frame structures", Adv. Eng. Soft., 35(3), 191-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2004.02.001
  21. Wu, N. and Shih, S.G. (2015), "A BIM inspired supporting platform for architectural design", Comput. Aid. Des. Appl., 12(3), 327-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/16864360.2014.981463

피인용 문헌

  1. A semi-automated method for integrating textural and material data into as-built BIM using TIS vol.5, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/acd.2020.5.2.127
  2. Redefining the territory and competency of architectural practitioners within a BIM-based environment: a systematic review vol.17, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2020.1768506