DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

학술지 소아청소년정신의학의 공저 네트워크 분석

Co-Author Networks in Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry

  • 김성완 (인제대학교 상계백병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 최범성 (양산부산대학교병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 김봉석 (인제대학교 상계백병원 정신건강의학과) ;
  • 김경민 (서울대학교병원 정신건강의학과 소아청소년정신분과)
  • Kim, Soungwan (Department of Psychiatry, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital) ;
  • Choi, Bum-Sung (Department of Psychiatry, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Bongseog (Department of Psychiatry, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital) ;
  • Kim, Kyoung-Min (Division of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Seoul National University Hospital)
  • 투고 : 2016.12.16
  • 심사 : 2017.02.18
  • 발행 : 2017.04.01

초록

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to analyze the co-author networks in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, a representative journal published by a branch of the domestic psychiatric academy, in order to present the current state of the co-authoring of and developments in child and adolescent psychiatry. Methods: We visualized and estimated the basic characteristics of the co-author networks shown by 564 authors who wrote 251 papers published in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry between 2005 and 2015, in order to assess their network characteristics, author centrality, and relevance to research performance. Results: The co-author networks in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry showed the characteristics of a small world and scale-free network. There was a correlation between the author centrality within the network and the research performance of the authors, but less correlation was shown between the centrality and mean paper citation counts. Conclusion: The network structure in the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry showed similarity to the co-authoring of other branches. However, given that the mean paper citation counts were less correlated with the author centrality than those in other branches, it may be necessary to promote an increase in the mean paper citation counts.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Scott J. Social network analysis. 3rd ed. London: SAGE Publications; 2012.
  2. Kretschmer H. Coauthorship networks of invisible colleges and institutionalized communities. Scientometrics 1994;30:363-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02017234
  3. Collins HM. The seven sexes: a study in the sociology of a phenomenon, or the replication of experiments in physics. Sociology 1975; 9:205-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/003803857500900202
  4. Velden T, Haque A, Lagoze C. A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks - mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientomterics 2010;85:219-242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0224-6
  5. Wuchty S, Jones BF, Uzzi B. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 2007;316:1036-1039. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1136099
  6. Lariviere V, Diepeveen S, Ni Chonaill S, Macaluso B, Pollitt A, Grant J. International comparative performance of mental health research, 1980-2011. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2013;23:1340-1347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.01.006
  7. Choi Y, Lee K. Analysis of types of journal paper coauthor: focused on Korean public administration review (1989-2008). Korean Public Adm Rev 2009;43:51-72.
  8. Choi M, Gim M. The characteristic analysis of researches network for journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc 2015;54:418-426. https://doi.org/10.4306/jknpa.2015.54.4.418
  9. Korean Citation Index. National research foundation of Korea [cited 2016 Oct 9]. Available from: https://www.kci.go.kr/.
  10. Hanneman RA, Riddle M. Introduction to social network methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside;2005.
  11. Lim BH, Jeon HJ. Using social network analysis to measure network structure of coauthored people in istics logistics: focusing on Korean logistics review. Korea Logist Res Assoc 2011;21:205-229.
  12. Bonacich P. Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 1987;92:1170-1182. https://doi.org/10.1086/228631
  13. Okamoto K, Chen W, Li XY. Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. In: Preparata FP, Wu X, Yin J, editors. Frontiers in Algorithmics. Berlin: Springer;2008. p.186-195.
  14. Marsden PV. Egocentric and sociocentric measures of network centrality. Soc Netw 2002;24:407-422. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(02)00016-3
  15. Son DW. Social network analysis. Seoul: Kyungmoonsa;2002.
  16. Freeman LC. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1978;1:215-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
  17. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16569-16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
  18. Cyram N. Cyram netminer 4.1.0. Seoul: Cyram;2013.
  19. Clauset A, Shalizi CR, Newman ME. Power-law distributions in empirical data. SIAM Rev 2009;51:661-703. https://doi.org/10.1137/070710111
  20. Newman ME. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:404-409. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.98.2.404
  21. Newman MEJ. Power laws, Pareto distributions and Zipf's law. Contemp Phys 2005;46:323-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/00107510500052444
  22. Travers J, Milgram S. An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry 1969;32:425-443. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786545
  23. Abbasi A, Altmann J, Hossain L. Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: a correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. J Inf 2011;5:594-607.

피인용 문헌

  1. 진료 협업 네트워크 특성에 대한 탐색: 서울 소재 A 대학병원 중심으로 vol.37, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2020.37.2.071
  2. The Thirty-First Year Journey, the Journal of the Korean Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry vol.31, pp.4, 2017, https://doi.org/10.5765/jkacap.200035