DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Service Industry Development Policy by Service Nature

서비스본질 기반의 서비스산업 정책방안

  • Kim, Hyunsoo (School of Business Administration, Kookmin University)
  • 김현수 (국민대 경영대학 경영학부)
  • Received : 2017.01.30
  • Accepted : 2017.03.10
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

The current research investigates the strategies for fostering service industries from the service's nature perspectives. Because the service industry is broad and heterogeneous in nature, if service's nature is not considered in building strategies for developing service industries, it would have a limited perspective, and thus, it would be difficult to foster large growth in service industries. In addition, not considering service's nature would not encourage synergy among service sectors nor encourage innovative development among individual sectors. Therefore, we need to understand that different service sectors are all under the umbrella for service industries, and consider the service's nature. The current research considers the service's relational, bidirectional, horizontality, and harmonization nature of services, and also, intangibility, inseparability, heterogeneity, perishability were considered in suggesting strategies for fostering service industries. These results can be used to developing governmental policies for developing service industries.

본 연구는 서비스산업 육성정책의 방향을 서비스의 본질 관점에서 연구하였다. 서비스산업의 범위가 넓고 업종이 다양하기 때문에, 서비스의 본질과 특성을 고려하지 않고 개별적인 산업의 특성을 중심으로 발전전략을 수립하면 한정된 시각을 가지게 되어 큰 발전을 추구하기 어렵다. 더구나 산업간 경계가 해체되는 현대 경제에서 중요한 변화를 간과할 수 있다. 또한 서비스산업간의 시너지를 추구하기 어렵고 개별산업의 혁신적 발전을 추구하기도 어렵다. 따라서, 각 개별서비스산업은 모두 서비스라는 공통적인 재화를 가진 산업임을 인식하여, 서비스의 본질 차원을 고려하여 발전전략을 설계할 필요가 있다. 본 연구는 서비스의 관계성, 쌍방향성, 수평성, 조화성 본질과 서비스의 무형성, 비분리성, 비일관성, 무재고성 특성을 반영하여 개별 서비스산업의 육성 전략을 도출해내는 시범연구로 수행되었다. 개별 서비스산업에서의 향상된 발전전략 수립과 정부의 발전정책 개발에 활용될 수 있을 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Autor, D.H. and Dorn, D. (2013). The Growth of Low-Skill Service Jobs and the Polarization of the US Labor Market, American Economic Review, Vol.103, No.5, 2013, pp.1553-1597. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.5.1553
  2. Kim, Hyunsoo. (2016a). A Structural Change to Service-Centered Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution: U-Model Industry and Employment Structure, Service Korea Initiative Special Conference, The Society of Service Science, April 2016, pp.43-54(김현수. (2016a). 4차혁명과 서비스중심경제로의 구조변화: U모델 산업 및 고용구조로의 전환, 서비스강국코리아 특별세미나 자료집, 2016.4.28., pp. 43-54).
  3. Kim, Hyunsoo. (2016b). A Study on Accelerating Service Economy by the 4th Industrial Revolution, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.6, No.3, Sept. 2016, pp.15-28 (김현수. (2016b). 4차 산업혁명의 서비스경제화 촉진 연구, 서비스연구, 제6권 제3호, pp. 15-28). https://doi.org/10.18807/JSRS.2016.6.3.015
  4. Kim, Hyunsoo. (2016c). Strategies for Global Competitiveness of Service Industries in Korea, in Proceedings of OECD-KIEP Joint Conference, Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, Dec. 2016, pp.85-95.
  5. Kim, Hyunsoo. (2015a). A Suggestion on the New Service Research Framework, Journal of Service Research and Studies, Vol.5, No.2, Sept. 2015, pp.199-216 (김현수. (2015a). 서비스연구의 프레임워크 제안, 서비스연구, 제5권 제2호, 2015.9, pp.199-216). https://doi.org/10.18807/jsrs.2015.5.2.199
  6. Kim, Hyunsoo. (2015b). Audit Paradigm Shift by Economy and Business Change, Audit Research, Vol.25, 2015.11, pp.5-26 (김현수. (2015b). 경제경영 변화에 따른 감사패러다임 변화, 감사논집, 제25호, 2015.11, pp.5-26).
  7. Kim, Hyunsoo. (2015c). A Transition Strategy from Traditional Economy to New Economy, in Proceedings of Service Korea Initiative 2015 Conference, The Society of Service Science, Dec. 2015, pp.175-185 (김현수. (2015c). 전통경제에서 신경제로 이행전략, 서비스강국코리아 2015 자료집, 2015.12, pp.175-185).
  8. Kim, Hyunsoo, Seo Young Kim. (2016). Introduction of the 'Service Industry Development Index': Initial Toughts on the New Paradigm Shift, Journal of Service Science Research, Vol.8, No.1, June 2016, pp.85-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-016-0005-8
  9. Kim, Jong Yeoul, Hyunsoo Kim, Jeung Sun Lee. (2016). An Analysis of Manufacturing - Service Industry Co-evolution: A Spiral Growth Model, Journal of Service Science Research, Vol.8, No.1, June 2016, pp.57-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12927-016-0003-x
  10. Lusch, R.F., S.L. Vargo, G. Wessels. (2008). Toward a conceptual foundation for service science: Contribution from service-dominant logic, IBM Systems Journal, Vol.47, No.1, Jan. 2008, pp.5-14. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.471.0005
  11. Park, Giim. (2016). A Growth Strategy for Korean Tourism Industry by Comparison with Japan, in Proceedings of Service Korea Initiative 2016 Conference, The Service Korea Initiative, Oct. 2016, pp.189-197 (박기임. (2016). 관광서비스 수출의 한일간 비교 및 한국의 관광서비스수출 확대전략, 서비스강국코리아 2016 자료집, 2016.10, pp.189-197).
  12. The Korean Government. (2016). A Strategy for Korean Service Economy, July 2016 (정부합동. (2016). 서비스경제 발전전략, 2016.7.5.).
  13. The Service Korea Initiative. (2016). A Vision Statement for Global Service Korea Initiative, in Proceedings of Service Korea Initiative 2016 Conference, The Service Korea Initiative, Oct. 2016, pp.18-23 (서비스강국코리아. (2016). 글로벌 서비스강국코리아 비전, 서비스강국코리아 2016 자료집, 2016.10, pp.18-23).
  14. The Society of Service Science. (2015). A Vision Statement for Service Korea Initiative, in Proceedings of Service Korea Initiative 2015 Conference, The Society of Service Science, Dec. 2015, pp.42-47 (서비스사이언스학회. (2015). 서비스강국코리아 비전문, 서비스강국코리아 2015 자료집, 2015.12, pp.42-47).
  15. World Economic Forum. (2016). Future of Jobs: Emloyment, Skills and Workforce Strategy for the Fourth Industrial Revolution, Jan. 2016.

Cited by

  1. 서비스 본질 특성과 동태적 역량이 중소제조기업의 조직혁신에 미치는 영향 vol.8, pp.1, 2018, https://doi.org/10.18807/jsrs.2018.8.1.027