Journal of the Korean Society for information Management (정보관리학회지)

Korean Society for Information Management (한국정보관리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Global Impact of Institutional Repositories in South Korean University

국내 대학 리포지터리의 세계적 영향력에 관한 연구

  • 신은자 (세종대학교 신문방송학과)
  • Received : 2017.02.20
  • Accepted : 2017.03.15
  • Published : 2017.03.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study attempts to measure visibility and impact of university repositories in South Korea with the help of web-sites, OpenDOAR, ROAR and RWR. Further understanding the self-archiving status of South Korea, the analysis results were compared with the reputation and power of major Asian countries' university repositories. The results showed that only nine institutional repositories of the universities in South Korea were active. There was only one South Korean university repository in the RWR top 500. All the other repositories ranked in bottom level. However, among Asian countries, Japan and Taiwan have established many institutional repositories. They had 257 and 52 repositories respectively. Fortunately, some leading university repositories in South Korea began activating self-archiving with the help of linking their own research outputs management system. Also, the attempts by other South Korean university repositories expect a substantial quantitative growth in the near future.

이 연구는 국내 대학 리포지터리의 글로벌 가시성과 영향력을 파악하기 위하여 관련 사이트인 OpenDOAR, ROAR, RWR 등에서 데이터를 수집하여 분석하였다. 그리고 이 분석 결과를 기관 리포지터리의 위상을 공고히 하고 영향력 확산에 노력하는 비영어권 아시아 주요 국가와 비교함으로써 국내 대학 리포지터리의 경쟁력을 확인하였다. 연구 결과 세 사이트에 모두 등재되어 있는 국내 대학 리포지터리는 9개에 불과하였다. 이 가운데 RWR 세계 순위 500위 안에 든 대학은 한 곳일 정도로 국내 대학 리포지터리의 세계적인 위상은 매우 낮았다. 반면 아시아 주요국인 일본과 대만은 대학의 리포지터리 수가 각각 257개, 52개일 정도로 많아 국내 대학 리포지터리 현황과 대조적이었다. 그렇지만 이 연구는 국내 선도적인 대학 리포지터리가 최근 연구업적관리시스템과 연계하여 구성원의 샐프 아카이빙을 보다 적극적으로 수행하기 시작하였다는 점을 새롭게 확인하였다. 이는 향후 대학 리포지터리의 양적 성장을 기대할 수 있게 하는 단서라는 점에서 긍정적이었다.

Keywords

References

  1. 권태훈 (2016). Open Access Road @ POSTECH. KESLI 전자정보 포럼, 1-11. (Kwon, Taehun (2016). Open Access Road @ POSTECH. KESLI Forum of Electronic Resources, 1-11.)
  2. 김미향, 김태수 (2010). 기관 리포지터리의 검색기능 향상을 위한 인명 접근점 제어 시스템 구축 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(3), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.3.125 (Kim, Mihyang, & Kim, Tae-Soo (2010). A study on developing a name access point control system to improve the performance of information retrieval from institutional repositories. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(3), 125-146. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.3.125)
  3. 김미향, 나혜란 (2010). 기관 리포지터리 S-Space 구축과 활성화 전략. 도서관보, 132, 25-44. (Kim, Mihyang, & Na, Hye-Ran (2010). Strategies to develop and activate S-Space, an institutional repository. Bulletin of the Seoul National University Library, 132, 25-44.)
  4. 김석현, 정현주 (2012). 이공계 연구중심대학의 진단과 과제. STEPI Insight, 106, 1-33. (Kim, Seok-Hyeon, & Jung, Hyun Ju (2012). Issues and challenges of S&T research-intensive universities. STEPI Insight, 106, 1-33.)
  5. 김영수 (2015). 학술 연구논문 오픈액세스(OA) 제도와 공공성. 지식의 공공성 딜레마, 1(1), 63-91. (Kim, YoungSu (2015). Open access system and publicness of academic articles. Public Goods Dilemmas of Knowledge, 1(1), 63-91.)
  6. 김희란, 정영미 (2010). 대학 기관 리포지터리 구축과 운영방안에 관한 연구. 한국도서관․정보학회 동계 학술발표회, 193-202. (Kim, Heeran, & Jung, Youngmi (2010). Building and management of institutional repositories in Korean university. Proceedings of the conference of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 193-202.)
  7. 박자현, 김기영 (2012). 도서관경영의 관점에서 본 국내 대학 기관레포지터리. 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 157-160. (Park, Ja-Hyun, & Kim, Giyeong (2012). An exploratory study on institutional repositories in Korean universities from the viewpoint of library management. Proceedings of the 19th conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 157-160.)
  8. 박희숙 (2016). 기관 리포지터리 및 연구성과관리 현황: KOASAS와 RIMS를 중심으로. OAK 컨퍼런스, 92-109. (Park, Heesook (2016). Case study of institutional repository and research outputs management system: Based on KOASAS and RIMS of KAIST. OAK conference, 92-109.)
  9. 서정욱, 안유리, 홍순영, 이재원 (2016). 서울대학교의 오픈 액세스 정책 수립에 대한 연구. 서울: 서울대학교. (Seo, Jeong-Wook, Ahn, Yuri, Hong, Soon-Young, & Lee, Jae-Won (2016). Strategic planning of open access initiative of Seoul National University. Seoul: Seoul National University.)
  10. 이재민, 손청기, 이미영 (2008). 국내 기관 레포지터리 구축 및 활성화 방안: KAIST의 KOASAS 사례를 중심으로. 정보관리연구, 39(3), 179-204. https://doi.org/10.1633/jim.2008.39.3.179 (Lee, Jae-Min, Son, Chung-Ki, & Lee, Mi-Young (2008). The institutional repository development and revitalization methods in Korea. Journal of Information Management, 39(3), 179-204. https://doi.org/10.1633/jim.2008.39.3.179)
  11. 이재원 (2013). 대학의 기관리포지터리가 대학 연구경쟁력 평가에 미치는 영향 분석. 한국문헌정보학회지, 47(3), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2013.47.3.049 (Lee, Jae-Won (2013). A study on the effect of institutional repository on the university's research competitiveness. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 47(3), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.4275/kslis.2013.47.3.049)
  12. 이진솔 (2015). 연구중심대학 도서관의 기관 오픈 액세스 리포지터리 구축․운영 사례. 디지틀도서관, 4, 31-38. (Lee, Jinsol (2015). A case of research-centered university library: Development of open access institutional repository. Digital Library, 4, 31-38.)
  13. 임상혁 (2016). 학술 논문의 오픈엑세스를 위한 제언. 한국디지털학술출판연구, 1, 1-10. (Ihm, Sahng-Hyeog (2016). A suggestion for enhancing open access of academic articles. Korean Digital Scholarly Publishing, 1, 1-10.)
  14. 장금연 (2013). 학술정보 유통을 위한 기관 레포지터리 운영모형 개발 연구. 정보관리학회지, 30(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.1.093 (Jang, Kum-Yeoun (2013). A study on the development of a university-based institutional repository operational model for scholarly information distribution. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 93-109. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2013.30.1.093)
  15. 전승준 (2011). 연구중심대학의 발전 과정과 육성 방향. 과학기술정책, 21(2), 27-41. (Jeon, Seung Joon (2011). Development process and fostering policy of research-intensive university. Science & Technology Policy, 21(2), 27-41.)
  16. 정경희 (2010). 공공기금으로 작성된 논문의 오픈액세스 정책에 관한 연구. 정보관리학회지, 27(1), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.1.207 (Joung, Kyoung-Hee (2010). A study on the open access policy to public funded research articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(1), 207-227. https://doi.org/10.3743/kosim.2010.27.1.207)
  17. 정영미 (2013). 동아시아 지역의 리포지터리 현황과 성장 분석. 한국정보관리학회 학술대회 논문집, 75-82. (Jung, Youngmi (2013). Analysis of status and growth of repositories in East Asia. Proceedings of the 20th conference of Korean Society for Information Management, 75-82.)
  18. 정영미 (2014). 일본의 리포지터리 확산과 성장 배경에 관한 연구. 일본근대학연구, 43, 427-448. https://doi.org/10.16979/jmak..43.201402.427 (Jung, Youngmi (2014). A study on the current status and its policy background of repositories proliferation in Japan. The Japanese Modern Association of Korea, 43, 427-448. https://doi.org/10.16979/jmak..43.201402.427)
  19. 조용훈, 서은경 (2016). 대학 학과기록의 디지털 리포지터리 플랫폼 구축. 한국기록관리학회지, 16(3), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2016.16.3.209 (Jo, Yong-Hun, & Seo, Eun-Gyoung (2016). Building a digital repository platform for academic department records. Journal of Records Management & Archives Society of Korea, 16(3), 209-233. https://doi.org/10.14404/jksarm.2016.16.3.209)
  20. Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., & Kiran, K. (2010). Global visibility of Asian universities' Open Access institutional repositories. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 15(3), 53-73.
  21. Aguillo, I. F., Ortega, J. L., Fernandez, M., & Utrilla, A. M. (2010). Indicators for a webometric ranking of open access repositories. Scientometrics, 82(3), 477-486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0183-y
  22. Ale Ebrahim, N. Salehi, H., Embi, M. A., Habibi, F., Gholizadeh, H., & Motahar, S. M. (2014). Visibility and citation impact. International Education Studies, 7(4), 120-125. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n4p120
  23. Bjork, B. C. (2013). Open access-Are the barriers to change receding? Publications, 1(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications1010005
  24. Byun, K. Y., Jon, J. E., & Kim, D. B. (2013). Quest for building world-class universities in South Korea: Outcomes and consequences. Higher Education, 65(5), 645-659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-012-9568-6
  25. Christian, G. E. (2008). Issues and challenges to the development of open access institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria. A research paper prepared for the International Development Research Centre (IDRC), Ottawa. ON, Canada, 1-64. Retrieved from https://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/36986/1/127792.pdf
  26. Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2010). Institutional repositories: Assessing their value to the academic community. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 11(2), 131-147. https://doi.org/10.1108/14678041011064052
  27. Cullen, R., & Chawner, B. (2011). Institutional repositories, open access, and scholarly communication: A study of conflicting paradigms. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 37(6), 460-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2011.07.002
  28. Ezema, I. J. (2011). Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigerian scholarly publication. Library Review, 60(6), 473-485. https://doi.org/10.1108/00242531111147198
  29. Ferreras-Fernandez, T., Merlo-Vega, J. A., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2013). Impact of scientific content in open access institutional repositories: A case study of the repository Gredos. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Technological Ecosystem for Enhancing Multiculturality, 357-363.
  30. Gargouri, Y., Hajjem, C., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Carr, L., Brody, & Harnad, S. (2010). Selfselected or mandated, open access increases citation impact for higher quality research. PLoS ONE, 5(10), e13636. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0013636
  31. Harnad, S. (2015) Open access: What, where, when, how and why. In J. B. Holbrook & C. Mitcham (Eds.), Ethics, science, technology, and engineering: An international resource. Farmington Hills MI: MacMillan Reference. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/361704
  32. Hitchcock, S. (2013). The effect of Open Access and downloads ('hits') on citation impact: A bibliography of studies. Retrieved from https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/354006/1/oacitation-biblio-snapshot0613.html
  33. Jamali, H. R., Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Levine, K., … & Nichols, F. (2014). How scholars implement trust in their reading, citing and publishing activities: Geographical differences. Library & Information Science Research, 36(3-4), 192-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2014.08.002
  34. Kim, J. (2006). Motivating and impeding factors affecting faculty contribution to institutional repositories. Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. Retrieved from https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/193/177
  35. Krzak, A., & Tate, D. (2016). Large scale implementation of open access: A case study at the University of Edinburgh's College of Medicine & Veterinary Medicine. Journal of EAHIL, 12(2), 8-12.
  36. Lange, J. (2016). Scholarly management publication and Open Access funding mandates: A review of publisher policies. Ticker: The Academic Business Librarianship Review, 1(3), 15-27.
  37. Lewis, D. W. (2012). The inevitability of open access. College & Research Libraries, 73(5), 493-506. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl-299
  38. Markulin, H., & Sember, M. (2014). University of Zagreb Medical School repository: Promoting institutional visibility. Croatian Medical Journal, 55(2), 89-92. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2014.55.89
  39. Niyazov, Y., Vogel, C., Price, R., Lund, B., Judd, D., Akil, A., … & Shron, M. (2016). Open Access meets discoverability: Citations to articles posted to Academia.edu. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148257. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148257
  40. OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories) (2014, April 23). Retrieved from http://www.opendoar.org/
  41. Pinfield, S., Salter, J., Bath, P. A., Hubbard, B., Millington, P., Anders, J. H., & Hussain, A. (2014). Open-access repositories worldwide, 2005-2012: Past growth, current characteristics, and future possibilities. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2404-2421. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23131
  42. QS (Quacquarelli Symonds) (n.d.). University rankings: Top universities. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings
  43. ROAR (The Registry of Open Access Repositories) (n.d.). Retrieved from http://roar.eprints.org/
  44. RWR (Ranking Web of Repositories) (n.d.). Retrieved from http://repositories.webometrics.info/
  45. RWU (Ranking Web of Universities) (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.webometrics.info/en
  46. Swan, A. (2010). The Open Access citation advantage: Studies and results to date. Retrieved from http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/268516/2/Citation_advantage_paper.pdf
  47. Tan, Lee-Hwa, Abrizah, A., & Noorhidawati, A. (2013). Availability and visibility of open access digital repositories in ASEAN countries. Information Development, 29(3), 274-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666912466754
  48. THE (Times Higher Education) (n.d.). World university rankings. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/
  49. Wagner, A. (2010). Open access citation advantage: an annotated bibliography. Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship, 60. Retrieved from http://www.istl.org/10-winter/article2.html
  50. Xia, J., & Nakanishi, K. (2012). Self-selection and the citation advantage of open access articles. Online Information Review, 36(1), 40-51. https://doi.org/10.1108/14684521211206953
  51. Zainab, A. N., & Nor, B. A. (2008). Visibility and Malaysian scholarly journals. Paper presented at the Workshop on Managing Scholarly Journals, Seaview Hotel, Lankawi, Malaysia. Retrieved from http://eprints.um.edu.my/id/eprint/1724
  52. Zuber, P. A. (2008). A study of institutional repository holdings by academic discipline. D-Lib Magazine, 14(11/12). https://doi.org/10.1045/november2008-zuber