References
- Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority(2015). The Australian Curriculum Science. Retrieved October 24, 2015, from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/download/f10
- Cho, C-K. (2006). A Continuous Concern of Citizenship Education in British Geography Education. Journal of the Korean Association of Regional Geographers, 12(3), 421-435.
- Choi, J-H. (2008). A study on fixing and categorizing of curriculum terms for planning curriculum of literary education in secondary school(2) - curriculum terms in secondary school curriculum of literary education in USA and Canada. Journal of the Korean Society of Literary Education, 21, 199-294.
- Choi, J., & Paik, S. (2013). A Comparative Analysis of Achievement Standards of the 2007 & 2009 Revised Elementary Science Curriculum with Next Generation Science Standards in US based on Bloom's Revised Taxonomy. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(2), 277-288. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2015.35.2.0277
- Department for Education(2014). The national curriculum in England Framework document. London: Department for education.
- Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage Publications.
- Kim, D.-H., & Kim, H.-N. (2012). International comparison of contents about particle concept in national science curricula. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 31(2), 164-176.
- Kim, S. & Choi, T. (2007). Research methodology in education. Seoul: Hakjisa.
- Kim, J.-S., Park, S.-K., Choi, J., & Lee, H. (2013). International comparative studies on the sequence and integrity of elementary and secondary school curricula (Research report RRC 2013-3). Seoul: Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation.
- Kwak, Y., Son, J,. Kim, M-Y,. & Ku, J. (2014). Research on Ways to Improve Science Curriculum Focused on Key Competencies and Creative Fusion Education. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(3), 321-330. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.3.0321
- Lee, Y., Yoon, H., Song, J-Y., & Bang, D. (2014). Analysis of science educational contents of Singapore, Canada and US focused on the integrated concepts., Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.1.1.00021
- Lee, H., & Yeo, C,. (2015). International comparison study on the articulation of the science curriculum: Focus on the concept of photosynthesis., Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 35(5), 805-815. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2015.35.5.0805
- Ministry of Education (MOE). (2014). Main points of the general guidelines for 2015 liberal art and natural science integrated curriculum. Ministry of Education. Retrived from http://ncic.re.kr/mobile.revise.board.view.do
- Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015a). 2015 revised curriculum -Overview-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- Ministry of Education (MOE). (2015b). 2015 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- Marsh, C. (1992). Key Concept for Understanding Curriculum Development. Paris: UNESCO.
- NGSS Lead States(2013). Next generation science standards for states, by states. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
- Next Generation Science Standards. (2014, December 14). NGSS Executive Summary. Retrieved from http://www.nextgenscience.org/sites/ngss/files/Final%20Release%20N GSS%20Front%20Matter%20-%206.17.13%20Update_0.pdf
- Ontario Ministry of Education(2007). The Ontario Curriculum Grade 1-8, Science and Technology. Retrieved November 6, 2015 from https://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/elementary/scientec18currb.pdf
- Ontario Ministry of Education(2008a). The Ontario Curriculum : Science Grades 9 and 10. Retrieved November 6, 2015 from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/science910_2008.pdf
- Ontario Ministry of Education(2008b). The Ontario Curriculum : Science Grades 11 and 12. Retrieved November 6, 2015 from http://www.edu.gov.on.ca/eng/curriculum/secondary/2009science11_
- Paik, N.-J. (2014a). Review of statements of achievement standards in subject curriculum : Focusing on the national science curriculum of Republic of Korea and the U. S.. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(2), 101-131. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.32.2.201406.005
- Paik, N-J. (2014b). Review of subject-specific competency based standards : focusing on social studies curriculum of Australia, Canada, Singapore. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32(4), 163-194.
- Paik, N-J., Ohn, J-D. (2015). Examination of How General Competency is Reflected and Presented in the Australian National Curriculum. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(2), 99-128. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.33.2.201506.005
- So, K-H. (2015). Things intended and realized in the 2013 revision of the national curriculum in England: significance and limitation. The Journal of Curriculum Studies, 33(3), 199-220. https://doi.org/10.15708/kscs.33.3.201509.009
- So, K-H., Jang, J-K., Lee, S-Y. (2011). Review on the Australian Curriculum: Process of the Development and Features. Korean Journal of Comparative Education, 21(2), 51-73.
- Yun, E., & Park, Y. (2014). Relationship of using science terminology between science curriculum and middle school science textbooks in the 2009 national curriculum. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 34(7), 667-675. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2014.34.7.0667
Cited by
- The Core concept of the Korean Language Arts vol.63, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.26589/jockle..63.201709.41
- 국어과 교육과정에서 ‘빅 아이디어’ 활용 방안 탐색 - 캐나다 BC주 자국어 교육과정에 대한 분석을 바탕으로 vol.54, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.20880/kler.2019.54.1.71