References
- Ahn, J., & Kwon, N. (2012). The analysis on domestic research trends for convergence and integrated science education. Journal of Korean Association for Science Education, 32(2), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2012.32.2.265
- Bang, D., Park, E., Yoon, H., Kim, J., Lee, Y., Park, J., Song, J., Dong, H., Shim, B., Lim, H., & Lee, H. (2013). The design of curricular framework for integrated science education based on big ideas. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 33(5), 1041-1054. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.5.1041
- BMBF(Federal Ministry of Education and Research) (2011). Germany - Israel Science and Technology, Education and Research. Division for Cooperation with European Countries, Israel 53170 Bonn, Germany
- Byun, M., & Cho, M. (2016). Examining ways to support engineering students for choosing a project topic in interdisciplinary collaboration. Journal of Engineering Education Research, 19(1), 37-46. https://doi.org/10.18108/jeer.2016.19.1.37
- Curriculum Standing Committee of National Education Professional Associations (CSCNEPA). (2007). Developing a 21st century school curriculum for all Australian students. Retrieved from http://www.acsa.edu.au/pages/images/CSCNEPA_paper_June087.pdf.
- DFE(Department for Education) (2014). The national curriculum in EnglandFramework document. Department for Education, UK.
- Kim, E. K. (2016). Inventive Problem Solving using IFR. Asia-pacific Journal of Multimedia Services Convergent with Art, Humanities, and Sociology, 6(9), 473-481.
- Kim, S., & Chung, U. (2007). Creative human capital as future growth engine and educational innovation. Korean Economic Journal, 46(4), 187-214.
- Kwon, H, Lee, E, & Lee, D. (2016). Meta-analysis on the Effectiveness ofInvention Education in SouthKorea: Creativity, Attitude, and Tendency for Problem Solving. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(1), 48-57.
- Lee, C. S. (2006). Interdisciplinary Connection of Content Standard of Invention Education. Proceeding of the Public hearing for establishing standard of contents of invention education contents and education contents system, pp. 53-81.
- Lee, H., Kwon, H., Park, K., Jung, C., Oh, H., & Nam, J. (2012). The effects of integrated science instruction : A Meta-analysis on scientific knowledge, scientific Inquiry ability, and science-related attitude. Korean Journal of Teacher Education, 28(2), 223-246.
- Lee, K., & Oh, E. (2012). A study on the perception of curriculum for cultivating students’ creativity in secondary school. Journal of Curriculum Integration, 6(1), 45-68.
- Lee, I. (2008). Convergence of knowledge. Seoul: Godswin.
- Maeng, H. J., & Seo, H. A. (2010). Characteristics of Learning Contents and Activities According to the Invention Education Managerial System for the Gifted at Elementary School Level. Journal of Korean Elementary Science Education, 29(1), 1-12.
- MSIP(Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning) (2014). Endless imagining room operations manual. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning, Korea. Retrieved from https://www.kofac.re.kr/?page_id=1677&uid=4277&mod=document.
- MOE(Ministry of Education) (2015). 2015 revised curriculum -Science-. Seoul: Ministry of Education.
- MOE(Ministry of Education and Science Technology) (2009). High school science curriculum manual. Ministry of Education and Science Technology.
- NRC(National Research Council) (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
- New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
- OECD (2007). PISA 2006: Science competencies for tomorrow's world. Volume I: Analysis. Paris: OECD.
- PCAST(The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology) (2010). Prepare and Inspire: K-12 Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (STEM) Education for America's Future. Executive Report, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, USA.
- Peppler, K., & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(3), 22-27. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500306
- Schweingruber, H. A., Quinn, H., Keller, T. E., & Pearson, G. (2013). A Framework for K-12 Science Education-Looking Toward the Future of Science Education. The Bridge, 43(1), 43-50.
- Seo, H., Jung, H., Son, J., Lee, B., & Maeng, H. (2006). Development of content standards for invention education. CR2006-57. Korean Educational Development Institute.
- Solomon, J., & Aikenhead, G. S. (Eds.). (1994). STS education: international perspectives on reform. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Son, J. (2014). The method of Invention educational approaches in science education curriculum dimension when developed integrated curriculum. Korea Association for Gifted Children Alliance Conference, 2014(1), 103-110.
- Son, Y, Pottenger III, F. M., King, A., Young, D., & Choi, D. (2001). Theory and practice of curriculum design for integrated science education. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 21(1), 231-254.
- UBS (2016). Extreme automation and connectivity: The global, regional, and investment implications of the Fourth Industrial Revolution. UBS White Paper for the World Economic Forum, Annual Meeting 2016.
- Yakman, G. (2007). STEAM education: an overview of creating a model of integrative education. Paper presented at the ITEEA annual conference.
- Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: a research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357-377. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20048
Cited by
- 3D 프린터를 활용한 호흡계의 융합 수업이 초등학생의 과학 탐구 능력, 창의적 문제해결력, 과학 흥미도 및 STEAM 프로그램 만족도에 미치는 영향 vol.37, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.15267/keses.2018.37.3.323
- Analysis of the Characteristics of High School Student Research Activities - Focused on the Prize-Winning Works in the Life Science Field of National Science Fair - vol.46, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.15717/bioedu.2018.46.3.380