DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Dual Monitoring with Stump Pressure and Electroencephalography During Carotid Endarterectomy

  • Chang, Jee Won (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Su Wan (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Seogjae (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Jonggeun (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine) ;
  • Ku, Min Jung (Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju National University School of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.07.01
  • Accepted : 2016.10.17
  • Published : 2017.04.05

Abstract

Background: Intraoperative monitoring during carotid endarterectomy is crucial for cerebral protection. We investigated the results of carotid endarterectomy under dual monitoring with stump pressure and electroencephalography. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 50 patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy between March 2010 and February 2016. We inserted a temporary shunt if the stump pressure was lower than 35 mm Hg or if any intraoperative change was observed on electroencephalography. Results: Seventeen (34%) patients used a temporary shunt, and the mean stump pressure was 26.8 mm Hg in the shunt group and 46.5 mm Hg in the non-shunt group. No postoperative mortality or bleeding occurred. Postoperatively, there were 3 cases (6%) of minor stroke, all of which took place in the shunt group. A comparison of the preoperative and the intraoperative characteristics of the shunt group with those of the non-shunt group revealed no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (p<0.01). Conclusion: Dual monitoring with stump pressure and electroencephalography was found to be a safe and reliable monitoring method with results comparable to those obtained using single monitoring. Further study should be performed to investigate the precise role of each monitoring method.

Keywords

References

  1. Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, et al. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003;361:107-16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12228-3
  2. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995;273:1421-8. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1995.03520420037035
  3. Jacob T, Hingorani A, Ascher E. Carotid Artery Stump Pressure (CASP) in 1135 consecutive endarterectomies under general anesthesia: an old method that survived the test of times. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2007;48:677-81.
  4. Nwachuku EL, Balzer JR, Yabes JG, Habeych ME, Crammond DJ, Thirumala PD. Diagnostic value of somatosensory evoked potential changes during carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Neurol 2015;72:73-80. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.3071
  5. Thirumala PD, Thiagarajan K, Gedela S, Crammond DJ, Balzer JR. Diagnostic accuracy of EEG changes during carotid endarterectomy in predicting perioperative strokes. J Clin Neurosci. 2016;25:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2015.08.014
  6. Cho JW, Jeon YH, Bae CH. Selective carotid shunting based on intraoperative transcranial doppler imaging during carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective single-center review. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2016;49:22-8. https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2016.49.1.22
  7. Bennett KM, Scarborough JE, Shortell CK. Predictors of 30-day postoperative stroke or death after carotid endarterectomy using the 2012 carotid endarterectomy-targeted American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. J Vasc Surg 2015; 61:103-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.100
  8. Ackerstaff RG, van de Vlasakker CJ. Monitoring of brain function during carotid endarterectomy: an analysis of contemporary methods. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 1998; 12:341-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-0770(98)90019-2
  9. Howell SJ. Carotid endarterectomy. Br J Anaesth 2007;99: 119-31. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/aem137
  10. Florence G, Guerit JM, Gueguen B. Electroencephalography (EEG) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP) to prevent cerebral ischaemia in the operating room. Neurophysiol Clin 2004;34:17-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2004.01.001

Cited by

  1. Selective Shunting Based on Dual Monitoring with Electroencephalography and Stump Pressure for Carotid Endarterectomy vol.34, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5758/vsi.2018.34.3.72
  2. Outcomes of Carotid Endarterectomy according to the Anesthetic Method: General versus Regional Anesthesia vol.52, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5090/kjtcs.2019.52.6.392