Phonetics and Speech Sciences (말소리와 음성과학)

Korean Society of Speech Sciences (한국음성학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of pause in English speaking evaluation

  • Kim, Mi-Sun (Department of English Linguistics Hankuk University of Foreign Studies) ;
  • Jang, Tae-Yeoub (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies)
  • Received : 2017.01.31
  • Accepted : 2017.03.15
  • Published : 2017.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to investigate the influence of utterance internal pause in English speaking evaluation. To avoid possible confusion with other errors caused by segmental and prosodic inaccuracy, stem utterances with two different length obtained from a native speaker were manipulated to make a set of stimuli tokens through insertion of pauses whose length and position vary. After a total of 90 participants classified into three proficiency groups rated the stimuli, the scored data set was statistically analyzed in terms of the mixed effects model. It was confirmed that predictors such as pause length, pause position and utterance length significantly influence raters' evaluation scores. Especially, a dominating effect was found in such a way that raters gradually deducted scores in accordance with the increase of pause duration. In another experiment, a tree-based statistical learning technique was utilized to check which of the significant predictors played a more influential role than others. The findings in this paper are expected to be practically informative for both the test takers who are preparing for an English speaking test and the raters who desire to develop more objective rubric of speaking evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Venkatagiri, H. (1994). Syllable duration and pausing in the speech of Chinese ESL speakers. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 807-812. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587566
  2. Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & S. Walker (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1-48.
  3. Blau, E. K. (1990). The effect of syntax, speed, and pauses on listening comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 746-753. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587129
  4. Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  5. Campbell, N. W., & Isard, S. D. (1991). Segmental durations in a syllable frame. Journal of Phonetics, 19(1), 37-47.
  6. Campione, E., & Véronis, J. (2002). A large-scale multilingual study of silent pause duration. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 199-202). Aix-en-Provence, France.
  7. Cheng, L., Myles, J., & Curtis, A. (2004). Targeting language support for non-native English-speaking graduate students at a Canadian university. TESL Canada Journal, 21(2), 50-71. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v21i2.174
  8. Clopper, C. G., & Smiljanic, R. (2011). Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American English. Journal of Phonetics, 39(2), 237-245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2011.02.006
  9. Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(04), 533-557. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263109990015
  10. Hoekje, B., & Williams, J. (1992). Communicative competence and the dilemma of international teaching assistant education. TESOL Quarterly, 26(2), 243-269. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587005
  11. Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2010.01.005
  12. Kendall, T. (2009). Speech rate, pause, and linguistic variation: An examination through the sociolinguistic archive and analysis project. Ph.D. Dissertation, Duke University.
  13. Kendall, T. (2013). Speech rate, pause and sociolinguistic variation: Studies in corpus sociophonetics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. Kenward, M. G., & Roger, J. H. (1997). Small sample inference for fixed effects from restricted maximum likelihood. Biometrics, 53, 983-997. https://doi.org/10.2307/2533558
  15. Klatt, D. H. (1976). Linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 59(5), 1208-1221. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.380986
  16. Kormos, J., & Denes, M. (2004). Exploring measures and perceptions of fluency in the speech of second language learners. System, 32(2), 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.01.001
  17. Kowal, S., & O'Connell, D. C. (2008). Communicating with one another: Toward a psychology of spontaneous spoken discourse. New York: Springer.
  18. Kuhn, M. (2008). Building predictive models in R using the caret package. Journal of Statistical Software, 28(5), 1-26. Retrieved from http://www.jstatsoft.org/v28/i05/ on January 2, 2017.
  19. Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (1982). Random-effects models for longitudinal data, Biometrics, 38, 963-974. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529876
  20. Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(01), 111-131.
  21. Pickering, L. (1999). An analysis of prosodic systems in the classroom discourse of native speaker and nonnative speaker teaching assistants. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Florida.
  22. Riazantseva, A. (2001). Second language proficiency and pausing a study of Russian speakers of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(04), 497-526. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310100403X
  23. Rossiter, M. J. (2009). Perceptions of L2 fluency by native and non-native speakers of English. Canadian Modern Language Review, 65(3), 395-412. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.65.3.395
  24. Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(01), 1-30.
  25. Zellner, B. (1994). Pauses and the temporal structure of speech. In E. Keller (Ed.), Fundamentals of Speech Synthesis and Speech Recognition (pp. 41-62). Chichester: John Wiley.