DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Characterization of Rockfish Skin Gelatin Composite Films

우럭 껍질 젤라틴 복합필름의 특성

  • Beak, Song-Ee (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Kim, Hyeri (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University) ;
  • Song, Kyung Bin (Department of Food Science and Technology, Chungnam National University)
  • Received : 2016.11.06
  • Accepted : 2016.12.06
  • Published : 2017.03.31

Abstract

To resolve environmental pollution caused by synthetic packaging materials, biodegradable films have been studied as an alternative. In this study, we prepared rockfish skin gelatin (RFG) and nano-clay (Cloisite $Na^+$ and Cloisite 10A) composite films to compare the effects of nano-clay on the physical properties of RFG film. Gelatin was extracted from rockfish skin and used to prepare RFG film with sorbitol as a plasticizer. Tensile strength (TS), water vapor permeability (WVP), and water solubility (WS) of the RFG film were 15.0 MPa, $2.70{\times}10^{-9}g\;m/m^2\;s\;Pa$, and 53.8%, respectively. Addition of nano-clay to the RFG film increased TS and decreased WVP and WS. The X-ray diffraction analysis and scanning electron microscopic results suggest that RFG/nano-clay composite films formed an exfoliated structure. These results indicate that RFG/nano-clay composite films can be applied as biodegradable packaging materials in the food industry.

플라스틱 포장 폐기물로 인한 환경오염을 해결하기 위한 대안으로 생분해성 필름이 많이 연구되어 왔다. 본 연구에서는 우럭 껍질 젤라틴(RFG)과 nano-clay(Cloisite $Na^+$, 10A)의 복합필름의 특성에 관하여 연구하였다. 우럭 껍질로부터 젤라틴을 추출하여 sorbitol을 가소제로서 첨가한 단백질 필름을 제조하였고, 제조된 RFG 필름의 tensile strength(TS), water vapor permeability(WVP), water solubility(WS)는 각각 15.0 MPa, $2.70{\times}10^{-9}g\;m/m^2\;s\;Pa$, 53.8%였다. RFG에 nano-clay를 첨가한 복합필름은 TS가 증가하고 WVP와 WS는 감소하였다. XRD 분석과 SEM 측정 결과를 통하여 RFG/nano-clay 복합필름 내부에 박리형 구조를 형성함을 확인할 수 있었다. 결론적으로 본 연구 결과 RFG/nano-clay 복합필름은 생분해성 포장재로 적용될 수 있음을 시사한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Yang HJ, Lee JH, Won M, Song KB. 2016. Antioxidant activities of distiller dried grains with solubles as protein films containing tea extracts and their application in the packaging of pork meat. Food Chem 196: 174-179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2015.09.020
  2. Rostamzad H, Paighambari SY, Shabanpour B, Ojagh SM, Mousavi SM. 2016. Improvement of fish protein film with nanoclay and transglutaminase for food packaging. Food Packag Shelf Life 7: 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fpsl.2015.10.001
  3. Bae HJ, Park HJ, Hong SI, Byun YJ, Darby DO, Kimmel RM, Whiteside WS. 2009. Effect of clay content, homogenization RPM, pH, and ultrasonication on mechanical and barrier properties of fish gelatin/montmorillonite nanocomposite films. LWT-Food Sci Technol 42: 1179-1186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2008.12.016
  4. Gomez-Guillen MC, Perez-Mateos M, Gomez-Estaca J, Lopez-Caballero E, Gimonez B, Montero P. 2009. Fish gelatin: a renewable material for developing active biodegradable films. Trends Food Sci Tech 20: 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2008.10.002
  5. Nagarajan M, Benjakul S, Prodpran T, Songtipya P. 2014. Characteristics of bio-nanocomposite films from tilapia skin gelatin incorporated with hydrophilic and hydrophobic nanoclays. J Food Eng 143: 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2014.06.038
  6. Nagarajan M, Benjakul S, Prodpran T, Songtipya P. 2015. Effects of pHs on properties of bio-nanocomposite based on tilapia skin gelatin and Cloisite $Na^+$. Int J Biol Macromol 75: 388-397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.01.034
  7. Sothornvit R, Rhim JW, Hong SI. 2009. Effect of nano-clay type on the physical and antimicrobial properties of whey protein isolate/clay composite films. J Food Eng 91: 468-473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.09.026
  8. Lee JH, Lee JH, Yang HJ, Won M, Song KB. 2015. Characterisation of jellyfish protein films with added transglutaminase and wasabi extract. Int J Food Sci Technol 50: 1683-1689. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12826
  9. Laemmli UK. 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680-685. https://doi.org/10.1038/227680a0
  10. Bae HJ, Darby DO, Kimmel RM, Park HJ, Whiteside WS. 2009. Effects of transglutaminase-induced cross-linking on properties of fish gelatin-nanoclay composite film. Food Chem 114: 180-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.09.057
  11. Song NB, Lee JH, Mijan MA, Song KB. 2014. Development of chicken feather protein film containing clove oil and its application in smoked salmon packaging. LWT-Food Sci Technol 57: 453-460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2014.02.009
  12. Zhang S, Wang Y, Herring JL, Oh JH. 2007. Characterization of edible film fabricated with channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) gelatin extract using selected pretreatment methods. Food Chem Toxicol 72: C498-C503.
  13. Song HY, Jo WS, Song NB, Song KB. 2012. Preparation of defatted grape seed meal protein composite films. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 41: 1274-1280. https://doi.org/10.3746/jkfn.2012.41.9.1274
  14. Lim GO, Jang SA, Song KB. 2010. Physical and antimicrobial properties of Gelidium corneum/nano-clay composite film containing grapefruit seed extract or thymol. J Food Eng 98: 415-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.01.021
  15. Nagarajan M, Benjakul S, Prodpran T, Songtipya P. 2014. Properties of bio-nanocomposite films from tilapia skin gelatin as affected by different nanoclays and homogenizing conditions. Food Bioprocess Tech 7: 3269-3281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-014-1319-5
  16. Lee JH, Song NB, Jo WS, Song KB. 2014. Effects of nanoclay type and content on the physical properties of sesame seed meal protein composite films. Int J Food Sci Technol 49: 1869-1875. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijfs.12496
  17. Song NB, Jo WS, Song HY, Chung KS, Won M, Song KB. 2013. Effects of plasticizers and nano-clay content on the physical properties of chicken feather protein composite films. Food Hydrocolloid 31: 340-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2012.11.024

Cited by

  1. Sea Squirt Shell Protein and Polylactic Acid Laminated Films Containing Cinnamon Bark Essential Oil vol.83, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1111/1750-3841.14207