DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Single Center Experience with Gastrostomy Insertion in Pediatric Patients: A 10-Year Review

  • Kim, Jiyoung (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Koh, Hong (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Chang, Eun Young (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Park, Sun Yeong (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, Seung (Department of Pediatrics, Severance Children's Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2016.08.22
  • Accepted : 2016.10.23
  • Published : 2017.03.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study was performed to review the outcomes of gastrostomy insertion in children at our institute during 10 years. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on 236 patients who underwent gastrostomy insertion from October 2005 to March 2015. We used our algorithm to select the least invasive method for gastrostomy insertion for each patient. Long-term follow-up was performed to analyze complications related to the method of gastrostomy insertion. Results: Out of 236 patients, 120 underwent endoscopic gastrostomy, 79 had laparoscopic gastrostomy, and 37 had open gastrostomy procedures. The total major complication rates for endoscopic gastrostomy insertion, laparoscopic gastrostomy insertion, and open gastrostomy were 9.2%, 8.9%, and 8.1%, respectively. The most common major complication was gastroesophageal reflux requiring Nissen fundoplication (3.8%), and other complications included peritonitis (1.3%), hiatal hernia (1.3%), and bowel perforation (0.8%). Gastrostomy removal was successful in 8.6% and 5.0% of patients in the endoscopic and surgical gastrostomy groups, respectively. Gastrocutaneous fistula occurred in 60% of surgically inserted cases, requiring a second operation. Conclusion: This retrospective study was performed to review the outcome of gastrostomy insertion, as well as to introduce an algorithm that can be used for future cases. Further studies should be conducted to make a consensus on choosing the most appropriate method for gastrostomy insertion.

Keywords

References

  1. Braegger C, Decsi T, Dias JA, Hartman C, Kolacek S, Koletzko B, et al. Practical approach to paediatric enteral nutrition: a comment by the ESPGHAN committee on nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2010;51:110-22. https://doi.org/10.1097/MPG.0b013e3181d336d2
  2. Maitines G, Ugenti I, Memeo R, Clemente N, Iambrenghi OC. Endoscopic gastrostomy for enteral nutrition in neurogenic dysphagia: application of a nasogastric tube or percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Chir Ital 2009;61:33-8.
  3. Stamm M. Gastrostomy by a new method. Med News 1894;65:324-6.
  4. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ Jr. Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg 1980;15:872-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3468(80)80296-X
  5. Rothenberg SS, Bealer JF, Chang JH. Primary laparoscopic placement of gastrostomy buttons for feeding tubes. A safer and simpler technique. Surg Endosc 1999;13:995-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004649901154
  6. Georgeson KE. Laparoscopic fundoplication and gastrostomy. Semin Laparosc Surg 1998;5:25-30.
  7. Grant JP. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with Stamm gastrostomy. Ann Surg 1988;207:598-603. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198805000-00014
  8. Zamakhshary M, Jamal M, Blair GK, Murphy JJ, Webber EM, Skarsgard ED. Laparoscopic vs percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube insertion: a new pediatric gold standard? J Pediatr Surg 2005;40:859-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2005.02.001
  9. Liu R, Jiwane A, Varjavandi A, Kennedy A, Henry G, Dilley A, et al. Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic, laparoscopic and open gastrostomy insertion in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2013;29:613-21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-013-3313-9
  10. Gray BW, Ruzic A, Mychaliska GB. Gastrostomy in pediatric patients. In: Kohout P, ed. Gastrostomy. Rijeka, Croatia: INTECH, 2011:17-24.
  11. Vervloessem D, van Leersum F, Boer D, Hop WC, Escher JC, Madern GC, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in children is not a minor procedure: risk factors for major complications. Semin Pediatr Surg 2009;18:93-7. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2009.02.006
  12. Gauderer MW. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy: a 10-year experience with 220 children. J Pediatr Surg 1991;26:288-92; discussion 292-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(91)90504-M
  13. Beasley SW, Catto-Smith AG, Davidson PM. How to avoid complications during percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Pediatr Surg 1995;30:671-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3468(95)90687-8
  14. Cosentini EP, Sautner T, Gnant M, Winkelbauer F, Teleky B, Jakesz R. Outcomes of surgical, percutaneous endoscopic, and percutaneous radiologic gastrostomies. Arch Surg 1998;133:1076-83. https://doi.org/10.1001/archsurg.133.10.1076
  15. Herrmann M. Algorithm for techniques of gastrostomy tube placement. Surg Endosc 2000;14:970-1; author reply 972-3. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000211
  16. Rabeneck L, McCullough LB, Wray NP. Ethically justified, clinically comprehensive guidelines for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement. Lancet 1997;349:496-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(96)07369-2
  17. Heine RG, Reddihough DS, Catto-Smith AG. Gastrooesophageal reflux and feeding problems after gastrostomy in children with severe neurological impairment. Dev Med Child Neurol 1995;37:320-9.
  18. Samuel M, Holmes K. Quantitative and qualitative analysis of gastroesophageal reflux after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. J Pediatr Surg 2002;37:256-61. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2002.30267
  19. Hament JM, Bax NM, van der Zee DC, De Schryver JE, Nesselaar C. Complications of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy with or without concomitant antireflux surgery in 96 children. J Pediatr Surg 2001;36:1412-5. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2001.26387
  20. El-Rifai N, Michaud L, Mention K, Guimber D, Caldari D, Turck D, et al. Persistence of gastrocutaneous fistula after removal of gastrostomy tubes in children: prevalence and associated factors. Endoscopy 2004;36:700-4. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-825662

Cited by

  1. Gastrostomy Tube Insertion in Pediatric Patients With Autosomal Recessive Polycystic Kidney Disease (ARPKD): Current Practice vol.6, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2018.00164
  2. Safety and efficacy of noncardiac surgical procedures in the management of patients with trisomy 13: A single institution‐based detailed clinical observation vol.176, pp.5, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.38678
  3. Current status of nutritional support for hospitalized children: a nationwide hospital-based survey in South Korea vol.12, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2018.12.3.215
  4. Laparoscopic Gastrostomy in Children: 10 Years of Experience vol.52, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.14744/semb.2017.15870
  5. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy vol.10, pp.2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.18528/ijgii210015
  6. Comparing Different Techniques in Children With or Without a Simultaneous Fundoplication: Does the Gastrostomy Technique Matter? vol.31, pp.9, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2021.0049