The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics

The Korean Academy of Prosthodonitics (대한치과보철학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the fit of cast gold crowns fabricated from the digital and the conventional impression techniques

  • Yun, Mi-Jung (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeon, Young-Chan (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Jeong, Chang-Mo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University) ;
  • Huh, Jung-Bo (Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2016.01.05
  • Accepted : 2016.12.20
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

PURPOSE. The purpose of this study was to compare the fit of cast gold crowns fabricated from the conventional and the digital impression technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Artificial tooth in a master model and abutment teeth in ten patients were restored with cast gold crowns fabricated from the digital and the conventional impression technique. The forty silicone replicas were cut in three sections; each section was evaluated in nine points. The measurement was carried out by using a measuring microscope and I-Soultion. Data from the silicone replica were analyzed and all tests were performed with ${\alpha}$-level of 0.05. RESULTS. 1. The average gaps of cast gold crowns fabricated from the digital impression technique were larger than those of the conventional impression technique significantly. 2. In marginal and internal axial gap of cast gold crowns, no statistical differences were found between the two impression techniques. 3. The internal occlusal gaps of cast gold crowns fabricated from the digital impression technique were larger than those of the conventional impression technique significantly. CONCLUSION. Both prostheses presented clinically acceptable results with comparing the fit. The prostheses fabricated from the digital impression technique showed more gaps, in respect of occlusal surface.

Keywords

References

  1. Miyazaki T, Hotta Y, Kunii J, Kuriyama S, Tamaki Y. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J 2009;28:44-56. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.28.44
  2. Christensen GJ. The state of fixed prosthodontic impressions: room for improvement. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136: 343-6. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2005.0175
  3. Christensen GJ. Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling. J Am Dent Assoc 2009;140:1301-4. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0054
  4. Mormann WH. The evolution of the CEREC system. J Am Dent Assoc 2006;137:7S-13S.
  5. Lowe RA. CAD/CAM dentistry and chairside digital impression making.Dental economics supplement September 2009. Available from: http://www.ineedce.com.
  6. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-4, 426-8, 430-1.
  7. Garg AK. Cadent iTero's digital system for dental impressions: the end of trays and putty? Dent Implantol Update 2008;19:1-4.
  8. Schwartz IS. A review of methods and techniques to improve the fit of cast restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1986;56:279-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(86)90003-X
  9. Felton DA, Kanoy BE, Bayne SC, Wirthman GP. Effect of in vivo crown margin discrepancies on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:357-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90225-L
  10. Grasso JE, Nalbandian J, Sanford C, Bailit H. Effect of restoration quality on periodontal health. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53: 14-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90056-3
  11. Richter WA, Ueno H. Relationship of crown margin placement to gingival inflammation. J Prosthet Dent 1973;30:156-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(73)90050-4
  12. Schwartz NL, Whitsett LD, Berry TG, Stewart JL. Unserviceable crowns and fixed partial dentures: life-span and causes for loss of serviceability. J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81:1395-401. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1970.0398
  13. Karlsson S. A clinical evaluation of fixed bridges, 10 years following insertion. J Oral Rehabil 1986;13:423-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.1986.tb01304.x
  14. Council on dental materials and devices. Revised American national standards institute/American dental association specification no. 8 for zinc phosphate cement. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:121-3. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0032
  15. Sorensen SE, Larsen IB, Jorgensen KD. Gingival and alveolar bone reaction to marginal fit of subgingival crown margins. Scand J Dent Res 1986;94:109-14.
  16. Christensen GJ. Marginal fit of gold inlay castings. J Prosthet Dent 1966;16:297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(66)90082-5
  17. Ostlund LE. Cavity design and mathematics: their effect on gaps at the margins of cast restorations. Oper Dent 1985;10: 122-37.
  18. McLean JW, von Fraunhofer JA. The estimation of cement film thickness by an in vivo technique. Br Dent J 1971;131: 107-11. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802708
  19. McLean JW. Polycarboxylate cements. Five years' experience in general practice. Br Dent J 1972;132:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4802795
  20. Gulker I. Margins. NY State Dent J 1985;51:213-5, 217.
  21. Kydd WL, Nicholls JI, Harrington G, Freeman M. Marginal leakage of cast gold crowns luted with zinc phosphate cement: an in vivo study. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:9-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(96)90411-4
  22. Wettstein F, Sailer I, Roos M, Hammerle CH. Clinical study of the internal gaps of zirconia and metal frameworks for fixed partial dentures. Eur J Oral Sci 2008;116:272-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00527.x
  23. White SN, Kipnis V. The three-dimensional effects of adjustment and cementation on crown seating. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:248-54.
  24. Grajower R, Zuberi Y, Lewinstein I. Improving the fit of crowns with die spacers. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:555-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90275-8
  25. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2010.03.015
  26. Reich S, Wichmann M, Nkenke E, Proeschel P. Clinical fit of all-ceramic three-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems. Eur J Oral Sci 2005;113: 174-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0722.2004.00197.x
  27. Rekow ED. High-technology innovations-and limitations-for restorative dentistry. Dent Clin North Am 1993;37:513-24.
  28. Tinschert J, Natt G, Mautsch W, Spiekermann H, Anusavice KJ. Marginal fit of alumina-and zirconia-based fixed partial dentures produced by a CAD/CAM system. Oper Dent 2001; 26:367-74.
  29. Carter JM, Sorensen SE, Johnson RR, Teitelbaum RL, Levine MS. Punch shear testing of extracted vital and endodontically treated teeth. J Biomech 1983;16:841-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9290(83)90008-8
  30. Strawn SE, White JM, Marshall GW, Gee L, Goodis HE, Marshall SJ. Spectroscopic changes in human dentine exposed to various storage solutions-short term. J Dent 1996;24:417-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-5712(95)00106-9
  31. Gemalmaz D, Alkumru HN. Marginal fit changes during porcelain firing cycles. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:49-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(05)80272-0
  32. Hamaguchi H, Cacciatore A, Tueller VM. Marginal distortion of the porcelain- bonded-to-metal complete crown: an SEM study. J Prosthet Dent 1982;47:146-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90178-0
  33. Wang CJ, Millstein PL, Nathanson D. Effects of cement, cement space, marginal design, seating aid materials, and seating force on crown cementation. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:786-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90583-V
  34. Seong JY, Jeon YC, Jeong CM, and Lim JS. The fit of a zirconia core fabricated with the CAD/CAM system. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2004;42:489-500.
  35. Gardner FM. Margins of complete crowns-literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1982;48:396-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(82)90072-5
  36. Fusayama T, Ide K, Hosoda H. Relief of resistance of cement of full cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:95-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(64)90124-6
  37. Eames WB, O'Neal SJ, Monteiro J, Miller C, Roan JD Jr, Cohen KS. Techniques to improve the seating of castings. J Am Dent Assoc 1978;96:432-7. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1978.0090
  38. Weaver JD, Johnson GH, Bales DJ. Marginal adaptation of castable ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:747-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(91)90408-O
  39. White SN, Yu Z, Kipnis V. Effect of seating force on film thickness of new adhesive luting agents. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:476-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(92)90414-6
  40. Brukl CE, Nicholson JW, Norling BK. Crown retention and seating on natural teeth with a resin cement. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:618-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(85)90003-4
  41. Syu JZ, Byrne G, Laub LW, Land MF. Influence of finish-line geometry on the fit of crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:25-30.
  42. Pera P, Gilodi S, Bassi F, Carossa S. In vitro marginal adaptation of alumina porcelain ceramic crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:585-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(94)90289-5
  43. Sorensen JA. A standardized method for determination of crown margin fidelity. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:18-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(90)90147-5
  44. Moon BH, Yang JH, Lee SH, Chung HY. A study on the marginal fit of all-ceramic crown using CCD camera. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 1998;36:273-92.
  45. Leong D, Chai J, Lautenschlager E, Gilbert J. Marginal fit of machine-milled titanium and cast titanium single crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:440-7.
  46. Molin M, Karlsson S. The fit of gold inlays and three ceramic inlay systems. A clinical and in vitro study. Acta Odontol Scand 1993;51:201-6. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016359309040568
  47. Laurent M, Scheer P, Dejou J, Laborde G. Clinical evaluation of the marginal fit of cast crowns-validation of the silicone replica method. J Oral Rehabil 2008;35:116-22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2003.01203.x
  48. Rahme HY, Tehini GE, Adib SM, Ardo AS, Rifai KT. In vitro evaluation of the "replica technique" in the measurement of the fit of Procera crowns. J Contemp Dent Pract 2008;9:25-32.
  49. Gassino G, Barone Monfrin S, Scanu M, Spina G, Preti G. Marginal adaptation of fixed prosthodontics: a new in vitro 360-degree external examination procedure. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:218-23.
  50. Groten M, Axmann D, Probster L, Weber H. Determination of the minimum number of marginal gap measurements required for practical in-vitro testing. J Prosthet Dent 2000;83: 40-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(00)70087-4
  51. Yoon JW, Yang JH, Han JS, Lee JB. A study on the marginal fit of collarless metal ceramic fixed partial dentures. J Korean Acad Prosthodont 2005;43:707-16.
  52. Vigolo P, Fonzi F. An in vitro evaluation of fit of zirconiumoxide-based ceramic four-unit fixed partial dentures, generated with three different CAD/CAM systems, before and after porcelain firing cycles and after glaze cycles. J Prosthodont 2008;17:621-6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-849X.2008.00366.x
  53. Gonzalo E, Suarez MJ, Serrano B, Lozano JF. Comparative analysis of two measurement methods for marginal fit in metal-ceramic and zirconia posterior FPDs. Int J Prosthodont 2009;22:374-7.
  54. Holmes JR, Bayne SC, Holland GA, Sulik WD. Considerations in measurement of marginal fit. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:405-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90170-4
  55. Jorgensen KD, Esbensen AL. The relationship between the film thickness of zinc phosphate cement and the retention of veneer crowns. Acta Odontol Scand 1968;26:169-75. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016356809026130
  56. Passon C, Lambert RH, Lambert RL, Newman S. The effect of multiple layers of die-spacer on crown retention. Oper Dent 1992;17:42-9.
  57. Eames WB, Sieweke JC, Wallace SW, Rogers LB. Elastomeric impression materials: effect of bulk on accuracy. J Prosthet Dent 1979;41:304-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(79)90013-1
  58. Kunii J, Hotta Y, Tamaki Y, Ozawa A, Kobayashi Y, Fujishima A, Miyazaki T, Fujiwara T. Effect of sintering on the marginal and internal fit of CAD/CAM-fabricated zirconia frameworks. Dent Mater J 2007;26:820-6. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.26.820

Cited by

  1. Comparison of the accuracy of digital impressions and traditional impressions: Systematic review vol.56, pp.3, 2018, https://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.3.258
  2. Reliability of light microscopy and a computer-assisted replica measurement technique for evaluating the fit of dental copings vol.26, pp.0, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-7757-2016-0590
  3. Effect of different CAD-CAM materials on the marginal and internal adaptation of endocrown restorations: An in vitro study vol.123, pp.1, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2018.10.024
  4. Effect of cement space on marginal discrepancy and retention of CAD/CAM crown vol.40, pp.5, 2017, https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2020-408
  5. Marginal and internal adaptation of single crowns and fixed dental prostheses by using digital and conventional workflows: A systematic review and meta-analysis vol.126, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.07.007