Structural Engineering and Mechanics

  • 제61권4호
  • /
  • Pages.483-496
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-4568(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1598-6217(eISSN)
테크노프레스 (Techno-Press)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The effects of special metallic dampers on the seismic behavior of a vulnerable RC frame

  • 투고 : 2016.05.04
  • 심사 : 2016.11.14
  • 발행 : 2017.02.25
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Earthquake excitations may induce important amount of seismic energy into structures. Current design philosophy mainly deals with the plastic deformations of replaceable energy dissipating devices rather than damages accumulated on structural members. Since earthquake damage is substantially concentrated on these devices they could be replaced after severe earthquakes. In this study, the efficiency of steel cushion (SC) on seismic improvement of a vulnerable reinforced concrete (RC) frame is determined by means of several numerical simulations. The cyclic shear behaviors of SCs were determined by performing quasi-static tests. The test results were the main basis of the theoretical model of SCs which were used in the numerical analysis. These analyses were performed on three types of RC frames namely bare frame (BF), full-braced frame (F-BF) and semi-braced frame (S-BF). According to analysis results; implementation of SCs has considerable effects in reducing the storey shear forces and storey drifts. Moreover plastic energy demands of structural elements were reduced which indicates a significant improvement in seismic behavior of the RC frame preventing damage accumulation on structural elements. Full-braced frame having SCs with the thickness of 25 mm has better performance than semi-braced frame interms of energy dissipation. However, global energy dissipation demand of S-BF and F-BF having SCs with the thickness of 18 mm are almost similar.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Alehashem, S.M.S., Keyhani, A. and Pourmohammad, H. (2008), "Behavior and performance of structures equipped with adas & tadas dampers", Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October.
  2. Ashour, S. and Hanson, R. (1987), "Elastic response of buildings with supplemental damping", Rep. No. UMCE 87-1 1987, Dept. of Civ. Engrg. Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  3. Aydin, E. (2013), "A simple damper optimization algorithm for both target added damping ratio and interstorey drift ratio", Earthq. Struct., 5(1), 83-109. https://doi.org/10.12989/eas.2013.5.1.083
  4. Aydin, E., Boduroglu, M.H. and Guney, D. (2006), "Optimal damper distribution for seismic rehabilitation of planar building structures", Eng. Struct., 29, 176-185.
  5. Bergman, D.M. and Gool, S.C. (1987), "Evaluation of cyclic testing of steel-plate devices for added damping and stiffness", Rep. No. UMCE 87-10, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
  6. Black, C.J., Makris, N. and Aiken, I. (2004), "Component testing seismic evaluation and characterization of buckling-restrained braces", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 130(6), 880-894. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:6(880)
  7. Chan, R., Albermani, F. and Williams, M. (2009), "Evaluation of yielding shear panel device for passive energy dissipation", J. Constr. Steel Res., 65(2), 260-268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.03.017
  8. Farsangi, E.N. and Adnan, A., (2012), "Seismic performance evaluation of various passive damping systems in high and medium-rise buildings with hybrid structural system", Gazi Univ. J. Sci., 25(3), 721-735.
  9. FEMA 356 (2000), Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.
  10. FEMA 461 (2007), Interim testing protocols for determining the seismic performance characteristics of structural and nonstructural components, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington.
  11. FEMAP695 (2009), Recommended methodology for quantification of building system performance and response parameters, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Redwood City, California.
  12. Garcia, D.L. (2001), "A Simple method for the design of optimal damper configurations in mdof sructures", Earthq. Spectra, 17(3), 387-398. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586180
  13. Gray, M.G., Christopoulos, C. and Packer, J.A. (2010), "Cast steel yielding fuse for concentrically braced frames", Proceedings of the 9th U.S National and 10th Canadian Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Toronto, Canada, July.
  14. Karalis, A.A., Georgiadi-Stefanidi, K.A., Salonikios, T.N., Stylianidis, K.C. and Mistakidis, E.S. (2011), "Experimental and numerical study of the behavior of high dissipation metallic devices for the strengthening of existing structures", Compdyn 2011 III Eccomas Thematic Conference on Computational Methods in Structural Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering , Corfu, Greece, May.
  15. Kelly, J.M., Skinner, R.I. and Heine, A.J. (1972), "Mechanisms of energy absorption in special devices for use in earthquake resistant structures", Bull. N.Z. Soc. Earthq. Eng., 5(3), 63-87.
  16. Maleki, S. and Bagheri, S. (2010), "Pipe damper, part I experimental and analytical study", J. Constr. Steel Res., 66(8-9), 1088-1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2010.03.010
  17. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park, R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804)
  18. Mazzolani, F.M. (2007), "Innovative metal systems for seismic upgrading of RC structures", J. Constr. Steel Res., 64 (7-8), 882-895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2007.12.017
  19. Oh, S.H., Kim, Y.J. and Ryu, H.S. (2009), "Seismic performance of steel structures with slit dampers", Eng. Struct., 31(9), 1997-2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.03.003
  20. Ozkaynak, H., Gullu, A., Gokce, T., Khajehdeh, A., Mahdavi, M., Azizisales, F., Bal, G.E., Smyrou, E., Yuksel, E. and Karadogan, H.F. (2014), "Energy dissipative steel cushions", 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul, Turkey, August.
  21. Priestley, M.J.N. (1991), "Overview of PRESSS research program", J. Precast Concrete Inst., 36(4), 50-57.
  22. Qu, J. and Li, H. (2012), "Optimal placement of passive energy dissipation devices by genetic algorithms", Math. Probl. Eng., 2012(474282), 1-20.
  23. Rai, D.C., Annam, P.K. and Pradhan, T. (2013), "Seismic testing of steel braced frames with aluminum shear yielding dampers", Eng. Struct., 46(2013), 737-747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.08.027
  24. SafeCladding EU Project (2012-2015). "Improved fastening systems of cladding panels for precast buildings in seismic zones", Project FP7-314122, Research for SMEs Associations.
  25. Sahoo, D.R. and Rai, D.C. (2010), "Seismic strengthening of nonductile reinforced concrete frames using aluminum shear links as energy-dissipation devices", Eng. Struct., 32, 3548-3557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.07.023
  26. Seismosoft (2014) "SeismoStruct v7.0 - A computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures", Available from http://www.seismosoft.com.
  27. Shultz, A.E. and Magana, R.A. (1996), "Seismic behavior of connections in precast concrete walls", Proceedings of Mete A. Sozen Symposium, ACI SP 162, Farmington Hills, Michigan, August.
  28. Takewaki, I. (2000), "Optimal damper placement for critical excitation", Probab. Eng. Mech., 15, 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0266-8920(99)00033-8
  29. TEC (2007), Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones, Turkish Earthquake Design Code (2007), Ankara, Turkey.
  30. Tovar, C. and Lopez, O. (2004), "Effect of the position and number of dampers on the seismic response of frame structures", Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August.
  31. Tsai, K.C., Chen, H.W., Hong, C.P. and Su Y.F. (1993), "Design of steel triangular plate energy absorbers for seismic resistant construction", Earthq. Spectra, 19(3), 505-528.
  32. TSE 498 (1997), Design loads for buildings, Turkish Standard Code 498, Ankara,Turkey.
  33. Uang, C.M. and Bertero, V.V. (1990), "Evaluation of seismic energy in structures", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 19(1), 77-90. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290190108
  34. Valente, M. (2013), "Seismic protection of r/c structures by a new dissipative bracing system", The 2nd International Conference on Rehabilitation and Maintenance in Civil Engineering Procedia Engineering, 54, 785-794.
  35. Whittaker, A., Bergman, D., Clark, P., Cohen, S., Kelley, J. and Scholl, R. (1993). "1993 code requirements for design and implementation of passive energy dissipation systems", The Energy Dissipation Working Group of the Base Isolation Subcommittee of the Structural Engineers Association of Northern California, ATC-17-1, San Francisco, March.
  36. Zhang, C., Zhou, Y., Weng, D.G., Lu, D.H. and Wu, C.X. (2015), "A methodology for design of metallic dampers in retrofit of earthquake-damaged frame", Struct. Eng. Mech., 56(4), 569-588 https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.4.569
  37. Zhang, R. and Soong, T. (1992), "Seismic design of viscoelastics dampers for structural applications", J. Struct. Eng., 118(5), 1375-1392. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:5(1375)

피인용 문헌

  1. Earthquake Response of Reinforced Concrete Building Retrofitted with Geopolymer Concrete and X-shaped Metallic Damper vol.98, pp.1-2, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40030-017-0209-z
  2. Uni-axial behavior of energy dissipative steel cushions vol.27, pp.6, 2018, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.6.661
  3. Design and Experimental Study on Shock-Absorbing Steel Bar with Limit Function for Bridges vol.2019, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3096291
  4. Probabilistic seismic demand of isolated straight concrete girder highway bridges using fragility functions vol.7, pp.3, 2017, https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2019.7.3.183
  5. Study on the extended steel plate connection for steel slit shear walls vol.28, pp.None, 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.09.030
  6. Towards optimal slip force and stiffness distribution in designing friction dampers vol.79, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.79.3.289