대한산업공학회지 (Journal of Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)

  • 제43권1호
  • /
  • Pages.49-61
  • /
  • 2017
  • /
  • 1225-0988(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-6457(eISSN)
대한산업공학회 (Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

녹색기술 유망 R&D 과제 선정 방법론 : 개도국향 기술사업화를 중심으로

R&D Project Selection Methodology for Green Technology : Focused on Developing Country-Oriented Technology Commercialization

  • 박철호 (녹색기술센터 기후기술협력센터) ;
  • 한준 (녹색기술센터 기후기술협력센터) ;
  • 구지선 (녹색기술센터 기후기술협력센터) ;
  • 이상훈 (부산과학기술기획평가원 전략기획본부) ;
  • 이학연 (서울과학기술대학교 글로벌융합산업공학과)
  • Park, Chulho (Center for Climate Technology Cooperation, Green Technology Center) ;
  • Han, Joon (Center for Climate Technology Cooperation, Green Technology Center) ;
  • Ku, Jisun (Center for Climate Technology Cooperation, Green Technology Center) ;
  • Lee, Sanghoon (Department of Strategic Planning, Busan Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning) ;
  • Lee, Hakyeon (Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Seoul National University of Science and Technology)
  • 투고 : 2017.01.09
  • 심사 : 2017.01.31
  • 발행 : 2017.02.15
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

This paper proposes an R&D project selection methodology for green technology centered on developing country-oriented technology commercialization. Eight selection criteria are derived from the R&BD logic model : technology needs of developing countries, effectiveness of green technology, technological potentials, domestic technological capability, commercialization feasibility, economic benefits, business feasibility, and spillover effects of developing countries. 21 qualitative and quantitative indicators are then defined for each criterion. The analytic hierarchy process is conducted to produce relative importance of evaluation indicators and to set final priority scores of R&D project candidates. The working of the proposed methodology is provided with the help of a case study example of Green Technology Center. The proposed methodology is expected to be effectively utilized for policy practices of R&D project selection in the field of green technology.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. An, H. and Lee, J. (2011), Status and Future Directions of Science and Technology Cooperation with Developing Countries, Issue Paper 2011-16, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning.
  2. An, J., Kim, K., Noh, H., and Lee, S. (2016), Identifying Converging Technologies in the ICT Industry : Analysis of Patents Published by Incumbents and Entrants, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 42(3), 209-221. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2016.42.3.209
  3. Bickman, L. (1987), The Functions of Program Theory, New Directions for Evaluation, 33, 5-18.
  4. Chiesa, V. (2005), R&D strategy and Organisation : Managing Technical Change in Dynamic Contexts, Imperial College Press, London.
  5. Clemen, R. (1996), Making Hard Decisions : An Introduction to Decision Analysis, Duxbury Press, Belmont.
  6. Graves, S. B. and Ringuest, J. L. (2012), Models and Methods for Project Selection : Concepts from Management Science, Finance and Information Technology, Springer Science and Business Media, New York.
  7. Green Technology Center (2014), A study on Demand Analysis on Green Technology in Developing Countries, Research Report 2014-011.
  8. Green Technology Center (2016), Developing Measures and Methods for Green Technology R&D Project Selection for Assistance to Developing Countries by Small and Medium Enterprises, Research Report 2016-014.
  9. Henriksen, A. D. and Traynor, A. J. (1999), A Practical R&D Project Selection Scoring Tool, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46(2), 158-170.
  10. Hong, M. Y., Hwang, K., Hong, J. S., and Lee, K. J. (2013), The Survey and Analysis of Technology Level on Korea's Key Green Technologies and its Implications, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 16(2), 476-505.
  11. Huang, C. C., Chu, P. Y., and Chiang, Y. H. (2008), A fuzzy AHP Application in Government-Sponsored R&D Project Selection, Omega, 36(6), 1038-1052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2006.05.003
  12. Jeon, I. and Lee, H. (2015), Performance Evaluation of R&D Commercialization : A DEA-Based Three-Stage Model of R&BD Performance, Journal of the Korean Institute of Industrial Engineers, 41(5), 425-438. https://doi.org/10.7232/JKIIE.2015.41.5.425
  13. Kim, M., Lee, H., Choi, C., Lee, S., Choi, K., and Jeon, J. (2008), A Model and its Application of Performance Monitoring, Evaluation, and Management System for National R&D, Journal of Korea Technology Innovation Society, 11(4), 709-734.
  14. Lee, S., Go, I., and Jeong, S. (2012), Concepts and Policy Directions for Green Technology, Issue Paper 2012-9, Korea Institute of Science and Technology Evaluation and Planning.
  15. Lee, S., Yoon, B., Lee, C., and Park, J. (2009). Business Planning Based on Technological Capabilities : Patent Analysis for Technology-Driven Roadmapping, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(6), 769-786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2009.01.003
  16. Liberatore, M. J. (1987), An Extension of the Analytic Hierarchy Process for Industrial R&D Project Selection and Resource Allocation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 34(1), 12-18.
  17. Martino, J. P. (1995), R&D Project Selection, Wiley, New York.
  18. McLaughlin, J. A. and Jordan, G. B. (1999), Logic Models : A Tool for Telling Your Program's Performance Story, Evaluation and Program Planning, 22(1), 65-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0149-7189(98)00042-1
  19. Meade, L. and Presley, A. (2002), R&D Project Selection Using the Analytic Network Process, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 49(1), 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.985748
  20. Ruegg, R. and Feller, I. (2003), A Toolkit for Evaluating Public R&D Investment Models, Methods, and Findings from ATP's First Decade, US Department of Commerce, Technology Administration, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
  21. Saaty, T. (1980), The Analytic Hierarchy Process, McGraw-Hill, New York.
  22. Saaty, T. (2001), The Analytic Network Process-Fundamentals of Decision Making and Priority Theory, RWS Publications, Pittsbugh.
  23. Saaty, T. and Ozdemir, M. (2004), The Encyclicon : A Dictionary of Decisions with Dependence and Feedback Based on the Analytic Network Process, RWS Publications, Pittsburgh.
  24. Vaidya, O. S. and Kumar, S. (2006), Analytic Hierarchy Process : An Overview of Applications, European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028
  25. Wijnmalen, D. (2007), Analysis of Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, Risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP : A Critical Validation, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 46(7-8), 892-905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2007.03.020